Arman Qamar1, Robert P Giugliano1, Anthony C Keech2, Julia F Kuder1, Sabina A Murphy1, Christopher E Kurtz3, Scott M Wasserman3, Peter S Sever4, Terje R Pedersen5, Marc S Sabatine1,6. 1. Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Study Group, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 2. Sydney Medical School, National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. 3. Amgen, Thousand Oaks, California. 4. National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom. 5. Oslo University Hospital, Ullevål and Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. 6. Deputy Editor.
Abstract
Importance: Little is known about the heterogeneity in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (LDL-C) lowering with proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor medications. Objective: To evaluate the interindividual variability in LDL-C reduction with the PCSK9 inhibitor drug evolocumab. Design, Setting, and Participants: We examined the percentage change in LDL-C levels from baseline in the Further Cardiovascular Outcomes Research With PCSK9 Inhibition in Subjects With Elevated Risk (FOURIER) trial, aplacebo-controlled randomized clinical trial of the PCSK9 inhibitor evolocumab in patients with stable atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease who were taking statin medications. Patients in either treatment arm who had high baseline LDL-C variability during screening and either did not receive the study drug, altered their background lipid-lowering therapy regimen, or had no LDL-C level sample in week 4 were excluded from the primary analysis. Analyses in the patients were stratified by treatment arm. Data was collected from 2013 to 2016, and data were analyzed from January 2018 to November 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: Interindividual variation in percent reduction in LDL-C with evolocumab. Results:There were 27 564 individuals in the cohort; after exclusions for baseline variability (n = 3524) or alterations in background lipid therapy and other causes (n = 2272), 21 768 patients remained. At week 4, the median percent reduction in LDL-C levels from baseline was 66% (interquartile range, 54%-76%; median [interquartile range] baseline value, 90 [79-105] mg/dL; postchange value, 31 [21-44] mg/dL) with evolocumab. During the first year, a total of 10 325 of 10902 patients in the evolocumab group (94.7%) had a reduction 50% or greater in LDL-C levels, 10 669 of 10 902 (97.9%) had a reduction 30% or more, and 10 849 of 10 902 (99.5%) had any reduction in LDL-C levels. Fifty-three patients (0.5%) had no apparent reduction in LDL-C levels. In the placebo arm, the median LDL-C reduction was 4% (interquartile range, 6% increase to 13% reduction; baseline median [IQR] value, 90 [79-106] mg/dL; postchange value, 87 [74-103] mg/dL) at 4 weeks. Waterfall plots showed notable variability in the top and bottom 5% of patients for both evolocumab and placebo groups, with large changes in LDL-C levels in the placebo group (increases of ≥25%, 531 patients [4.9%]; decreases of ≥25%, 985 patients [9.1%]). At 4 weeks, the placebo-adjusted reductions in LDL-C levels with evolocumab were 50% or greater in 9839 of 10 866 patients (90.5%) and 30% or greater in 10 846 of 10 866 patients (99.8%). Results were consistent across clinically relevant subgroups. Conclusions and Relevance: There appears to be a highly consistent robust reduction in LDL-C levels with evolocumab use. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01764633.
RCT Entities:
Importance: Little is known about the heterogeneity in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (LDL-C) lowering with proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor medications. Objective: To evaluate the interindividual variability in LDL-C reduction with the PCSK9 inhibitor drug evolocumab. Design, Setting, and Participants: We examined the percentage change in LDL-C levels from baseline in the Further Cardiovascular Outcomes Research With PCSK9 Inhibition in Subjects With Elevated Risk (FOURIER) trial, a placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial of the PCSK9 inhibitor evolocumab in patients with stable atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease who were taking statin medications. Patients in either treatment arm who had high baseline LDL-C variability during screening and either did not receive the study drug, altered their background lipid-lowering therapy regimen, or had no LDL-C level sample in week 4 were excluded from the primary analysis. Analyses in the patients were stratified by treatment arm. Data was collected from 2013 to 2016, and data were analyzed from January 2018 to November 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: Interindividual variation in percent reduction in LDL-C with evolocumab. Results: There were 27 564 individuals in the cohort; after exclusions for baseline variability (n = 3524) or alterations in background lipid therapy and other causes (n = 2272), 21 768 patients remained. At week 4, the median percent reduction in LDL-C levels from baseline was 66% (interquartile range, 54%-76%; median [interquartile range] baseline value, 90 [79-105] mg/dL; postchange value, 31 [21-44] mg/dL) with evolocumab. During the first year, a total of 10 325 of 10902 patients in the evolocumab group (94.7%) had a reduction 50% or greater in LDL-C levels, 10 669 of 10 902 (97.9%) had a reduction 30% or more, and 10 849 of 10 902 (99.5%) had any reduction in LDL-C levels. Fifty-three patients (0.5%) had no apparent reduction in LDL-C levels. In the placebo arm, the median LDL-C reduction was 4% (interquartile range, 6% increase to 13% reduction; baseline median [IQR] value, 90 [79-106] mg/dL; postchange value, 87 [74-103] mg/dL) at 4 weeks. Waterfall plots showed notable variability in the top and bottom 5% of patients for both evolocumab and placebo groups, with large changes in LDL-C levels in the placebo group (increases of ≥25%, 531 patients [4.9%]; decreases of ≥25%, 985 patients [9.1%]). At 4 weeks, the placebo-adjusted reductions in LDL-C levels with evolocumab were 50% or greater in 9839 of 10 866 patients (90.5%) and 30% or greater in 10 846 of 10 866 patients (99.8%). Results were consistent across clinically relevant subgroups. Conclusions and Relevance: There appears to be a highly consistent robust reduction in LDL-C levels with evolocumab use. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01764633.
Authors: Jessica L Mega; David A Morrow; Alison Brown; Christopher P Cannon; Marc S Sabatine Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2009-08-10 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Devin M Mann; Nicole L Glazer; Michael Winter; Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Paul Muntner; Daichi Shimbo; William G Adams; Nancy R Kressin; Yuqing Zhang; Hyon Choi; Howard Cabral Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2013-02-20 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Marc S Sabatine; Robert P Giugliano; Anthony Keech; Narimon Honarpour; Huei Wang; Thomas Liu; Scott M Wasserman; Robert Scott; Peter S Sever; Terje R Pedersen Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2015-12-17 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Paul M Ridker; Jean-Claude Tardif; Pierre Amarenco; William Duggan; Robert J Glynn; J Wouter Jukema; John J P Kastelein; Albert M Kim; Wolfgang Koenig; Steven Nissen; James Revkin; Lynda M Rose; Raul D Santos; Pamela F Schwartz; Charles L Shear; Carla Yunis Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-03-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Marc S Sabatine; Robert P Giugliano; Anthony C Keech; Narimon Honarpour; Stephen D Wiviott; Sabina A Murphy; Julia F Kuder; Huei Wang; Thomas Liu; Scott M Wasserman; Peter S Sever; Terje R Pedersen Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-03-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Olivier Descamps; Joanne E Tomassini; Jianxin Lin; Adam B Polis; Arvind Shah; Philippe Brudi; Mary E Hanson; Andrew M Tershakovec Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2015-03-09 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: Joel A Simon; Feng Lin; Stephen B Hulley; Patricia J Blanche; David Waters; Stephen Shiboski; Jerome I Rotter; Deborah A Nickerson; Huiying Yang; Mohammed Saad; Ronald M Krauss Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2006-01-27 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Gregory G Schwartz; P Gabriel Steg; Michael Szarek; Deepak L Bhatt; Vera A Bittner; Rafael Diaz; Jay M Edelberg; Shaun G Goodman; Corinne Hanotin; Robert A Harrington; J Wouter Jukema; Guillaume Lecorps; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Angèle Moryusef; Robert Pordy; Kirby Quintero; Matthew T Roe; William J Sasiela; Jean-François Tamby; Pierluigi Tricoci; Harvey D White; Andreas M Zeiher Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2018-11-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: S Trompet; I Postmus; P E Slagboom; B T Heijmans; R A J Smit; A B Maier; B M Buckley; N Sattar; D J Stott; I Ford; R G J Westendorp; A J M de Craen; J W Jukema Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2015-12-19 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Ali Allahyari; Tomas Jernberg; Emil Hagström; Margrét Leosdottir; Pia Lundman; Peter Ueda Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2020-10-21 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Milan Gupta; G B John Mancini; Rajvi J Wani; Vineeta Ahooja; Jean Bergeron; Priya Manjoo; A Shekhar Pandey; Maureen Reiner; Johnny Beltran; Thiago Oliveira; Erin S Mackinnon Journal: CJC Open Date: 2022-03-12
Authors: Bruce A Warden; Joshua R Miles; Carlota Oleaga; Om P Ganda; P Barton Duell; Jonathan Q Purnell; Michael D Shapiro; Sergio Fazio Journal: Am J Prev Cardiol Date: 2020-05-01