| Literature DB >> 30539110 |
Kimberly B Bjugstad1, Paul Gutowski2, Jennifer Pekarek2, Pamela Bourg2, Charles W Mains2, David Bar-Or1.
Abstract
Despite the unique opportunity race car driving provides to study exercise in extreme conditions, the sport of racing is under-represented. A better understanding of how racing changes physiological measures combined with driver demographics may help reduce driver risks and expand the field of driver science. This study charted the changes in heart rate, body temperature, blood pressure, static oxidation reduction potential (sORP), and antioxidant capacity in drivers before and after racing (n=23). The interaction between racing and driver characteristics on physiological variables were evaluated. Heart rate, body temperature, and sORP were elevated after racing (P<0.05). Age, cockpit temperature, experience, and speed did not correlate with physiological or oxidative measures (P>0.05). Elevated post-race sORP values were associated with higher pre-race systolic blood pressure and lower antioxidant capacity (P<0.05). We conclude that racing alters the redox response in drivers and that drivers' pre-race systolic blood pressure and antioxidant capacity can further alter it. A better understanding of the physical and oxidative changes which result from racing may help minimize the unique risks.Entities:
Keywords: antioxidant capacity; car racing; heart rate; hypertension
Year: 2017 PMID: 30539110 PMCID: PMC6226088 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-119065
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sports Med Int Open ISSN: 2367-1890
Fig. 1A timeline of procedures over the course of the 2-day racing event.
Table 1 Descriptive statistics of drivers and driving conditions.
| Descriptive Statistics | Median (min-max) | Mean | SEM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 59.5 (36–76) | 59.7 | 2.4 |
| Height (cm) | 177.8 (167.6–190.5) | 180.0 | 1.4 |
| Weight (kg) | 83.9 (65.8–108.9) | 83.3 | 2.4 |
| BMI | 25.8 (20.8–30.0) | 25.8 | 0.53 |
| Years Racing | 15 (1–45) | 14.8 | 2.2 |
| Internal Car Temp (°C) | 26.1 (22.2–37.2) | 26.4 | 0.63 |
| Speed (km/hr) | 71.0 (67.5–83.2) | 72.7 | 0.95 |
|
|
|
| |
| Cooling Shirt | 11 | 12 | |
| Daily Vitamin Use | 13 | 10 | |
| Alcohol Use | 20 | 3 | |
|
Hypertension
| 7 | 16 | |
| First Time on Track | 2 | 21 | |
|
|
|
| |
| Daily Temperature (°C) | 21.3 | 28.3 | |
| Relative Humidity (%) | 41.6 | 14.7 |
Table 2 Increasing weight was correlated with increased sORP and icORP values after racing.
| Age | Height | Weight | BMI | Race Years | Cockpit Temp. | Speed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heart Rate (beats/min) | Baseline | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.16 | 0.25 | 0.02 | −0.14 | −0.34 |
| Post-race | 0.10 | 0.19 | 0.11 | 0.03 | −0.03 | −0.15 | −0.34 | |
| sBP (mm Hg) | Baseline | 0.30 | 0.41 | 0.35 | 0.18 | 0.13 | −0.19 | −0.26 |
| Post-race | 0.07 | −0.08 | −0.31 | −0.31 | 0.11 | −0.16 | −0.07 | |
| dBP (mm Hg) | Baseline | −0.26 | −0.03 | 0.01 | 0.08 | −0.23 | 0.20 | 0.04 |
| Post-race | −0.07 | −0.13 | −0.38 | −0.36 | −0.23 | 0.19 | 0.19 | |
| Body Temp (°C) | Baseline | −0.35 | −0.03 | −0.12 | 0.01 | −0.06 | 0.31 | 0.14 |
| Post-race | −0.08 | 0.39 | 0.25 | 0.04 | −0.09 | 0.10 | 0.04 | |
| sORP (mV) | Baseline | −0.02 | −0.03 | −0.06 | −0.14 | −0.35 | 0.15 | −0.12 |
| Post-race | 0.02 | 0.37 |
| 0.32 | −0.17 | 0.11 | −0.06 | |
|
icORP (μC
| Baseline | 0.04 | 0.14 | 0.20 | 0.10 | −0.39 | 0.03 | −0.10 |
| Post-race | 0.00 | 0.27 |
| 0.33 | −0.34 | 0.22 | −0.02 | |
No other physiological measure was affected by either driver demographics or racing conditions. Values presented are correlation r values, *p<0.05
Fig. 2Significant elevations in sORP a , body temperature b , and heart rate c were measured post-race compared to baseline. Respective ANOVA results are presented within each graph. * significant increase over baseline, P<0.05.
Table 3 Descriptive statistics and P-values between baseline and post-race for icORP, sBP, and dBP.
| Baseline (mean +/− SEM) | Post-race (mean +/− SEM) | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
icORP (μC
| 2.20+/−0.15 | 2.18+/−0.13 | 0.78 |
| sBP (mm Hg) | 132.4+/−2.8 | 132.0+/−2.5 | 0.96 |
| dBP (mm Hg) | 78.4+/−2.0 | 77.5+/−2.6 | 0.45 |
Fig. 3Group differences independent of racing status. a . Those drivers with hypertension who were taking high blood pressure medication have significantly lower sORP values. All hypertensive drivers were taking medications. b . Those drivers who take vitamins daily had lower icORP values and thus higher antioxidant capacity than those who do not take vitamins. c . Analysis showed hypertensive drivers who take vitamins (HBP/Vit) had significantly lower sORP values than normotensive drivers who do not take vitamins (NBP/No Vit). Normotensive drivers taking vitamins (NBP/Vit) were in between these two values and did not significantly differ from either one. d . icORP values were lower in HBP/Vit compared to the NBP/No Vit. Again, the NPB/Vit had icORP values in between the other two groups. There were only 2 hypertensive drivers who did not take vitamins (HBP/No Vit), so this group was not included in the statistical analysis, but the mean sORP and icORP values are represented in the graphs. Respective ANOVA results are presented within each graph. * Significant difference, P<0.05.
Fig. 4Post-race sORP values increased when baseline sBP and icORP values were increased. A 3-D XYZ graph plotting the estimated sORP values as a function of sBP and icORP values based on the multiple regression equation (P<0.05, see main text). Color legend represents the corresponding post-race sORP values, with red indicating higher sORP values and green indicating lower sORP values.