Literature DB >> 30538921

Establishing Consumer Protections for Research in Human Service Agencies.

Linda A LeBlanc1,2, Melissa R Nosik3, Anna Petursdottir4.   

Abstract

Conducting research in practice settings is the primary mechanism for establishing a strong foundation of evidence for clinical decision making. In behavior analysis, this type of research frequently originates from university-based systems that have established institutional review boards. Independent human service agencies that want to contribute applied research to the literature base that is clinically meaningful and conducted in an ethical fashion must establish a research review committee (RRC). The purpose of this article is to provide information and guidance for establishing and maintaining the activity of an RRC in a human service setting.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Consumer protection; Human service agencies; Institutional review board; Research

Year:  2018        PMID: 30538921      PMCID: PMC6269374          DOI: 10.1007/s40617-018-0206-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Anal Pract        ISSN: 1998-1929


  10 in total

1.  The affirmation of the scientist-practitioner. A look back at Boulder.

Authors:  D B Baker; L T Benjamin
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2000-02

2.  Protection of human subjects: categories of research that may be reviewed by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) through an expedited review procedure--FDA. Notice.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  1998-11-09

3.  Teaching abduction-prevention skills to children with autism.

Authors:  Kristin V Gunby; James E Carr; Linda A Leblanc
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2010-03

4.  Teaching effective hand raising to children with autism during group instruction.

Authors:  Shaireen M Charania; Linda A LeBlanc; Narmatha Sabanathan; Inas A Ktaech; James E Carr; Kristin Gunby
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2010

5.  Institutional review board community members: who are they, what do they do, and whom do they represent?

Authors:  Robert Klitzman
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 6.893

6.  Ethical considerations in research studies.

Authors:  Lynne M Connelly
Journal:  Medsurg Nurs       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb

7.  Determining when quality improvement initiatives should be considered research: proposed criteria and potential implications.

Authors:  D Casarett; J H Karlawish; J Sugarman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-05-03       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  The local clinical scientist. A bridge between science and practice.

Authors:  G Stricker; S J Trierweiler
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1995-12

9.  The effects of the question "What is this?" on tact-training outcomes of children with autism.

Authors:  Nancy V Marchese; James E Carr; Linda A LeBlanc; Tiffany C Rosati; Samantha A Conroy
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2012

Review 10.  Working with the institutional review board.

Authors:  Wesley G Byerly
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 2.637

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Overcoming Barriers to Applied Research: A Guide for Practitioners.

Authors:  Amber L Valentino; Jessica F Juanico
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2020-10-13

Review 2.  Practical Considerations for Researchers at Teaching-Focused Colleges.

Authors:  Cody Morris; Karen M Lionello-DeNolf
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2021-02-17
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.