Literature DB >> 26399766

Contrasting soil bacterial community structure between the phyla Acidobacteria and Proteobacteria in tropical Southeast Asian and temperate Japanese forests.

Naohiko T Miyashita1.   

Abstract

Soil bacterial community structures of six dominant phyla (Acidobacteria, Proteobacteria, Verrucomicrobia, Planctomycetes, Bacteroidetes and Actinobacteria) and unclassified bacteria detected in tropical Sarawakian and temperate Japanese forests were compared based on 16S rRNA gene sequence variation. The class composition in each phylum was similar among the studied forests; however, significant heterogeneities of class frequencies were detected. Acidobacteria and Proteobacteria were the most dominant phyla in all six forests, but differed in the level of bacterial species diversity, pattern of species occurrence and association pattern of species composition with physicochemical properties in soil. Species diversity among Acidobacteria was approximately half that among Proteobacteria, based on the number of clusters and the Chao1 index, even though a similar number of sequence reads were obtained for these two phyla. In contrast, species diversity within Planctomycetes and Bacteroidetes was nearly as high as within Acidobacteria, despite many fewer sequence reads. The density of species (the number of sequence reads per cluster) correlated negatively with species diversity, and species density within Acidobacteria was approximately twice that within Proteobacteria. Although the percentage of forest-specific species was high for all bacterial groups, sampling site-specific species varied among bacterial groups, indicating limited inter-forest migration and differential movement of bacteria in forest soil. For five of the seven bacterial groups, including Acidobacteria, soil pH appeared to strongly influence species composition, but this association was not observed for Proteobacterial species. Topology of UPGMA trees and pattern of NMDS plots among the forests differed among the bacterial groups, suggesting that each bacterial group has adapted and evolved independently in each forest.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26399766     DOI: 10.1266/ggs.90.61

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Genet Syst        ISSN: 1341-7568            Impact factor:   1.517


  6 in total

1.  Metagenomic Characterization of Bacterial Communities in Drinking Water Supply System of a Mega City.

Authors:  Faizan Saleem; Atif Mustafa; Junaid Ahmed Kori; Muhammad Saad Hussain; M Kamran Azim
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  Influence of Altered Microbes on Soil Organic Carbon Availability in Karst Agricultural Soils Contaminated by Pb-Zn Tailings.

Authors:  Qiang Li; Chang Liu; Xiaohong Wang; Zhenjiang Jin; Ang Song; Yueming Liang; Jianhua Cao; Werner E G Müller
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 5.640

3.  Variations in Soil Bacterial Community Diversity and Structures Among Different Revegetation Types in the Baishilazi Nature Reserve.

Authors:  Jiaojiao Deng; You Yin; Wenxu Zhu; Yongbin Zhou
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 4.  Planctomycetes as Host-Associated Bacteria: A Perspective That Holds Promise for Their Future Isolations, by Mimicking Their Native Environmental Niches in Clinical Microbiology Laboratories.

Authors:  Odilon D Kaboré; Sylvain Godreuil; Michel Drancourt
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 5.293

5.  Local Geomorphological Gradients and Land Use Patterns Play Key Role on the Soil Bacterial Community Diversity and Dynamics in the Highly Endemic Indigenous Afrotemperate Coastal Scarp Forest Biome.

Authors:  Henry Joseph Oduor Ogola; Ramganesh Selvarajan; Memory Tekere
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Contrasting Soil Bacterial Community, Diversity, and Function in Two Forests in China.

Authors:  Hua Wei; Changhui Peng; Bin Yang; Hanxiong Song; Quan Li; Lin Jiang; Gang Wei; Kefeng Wang; Hui Wang; Shirong Liu; Xiaojing Liu; Dexiang Chen; Yide Li; Meng Wang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 5.640

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.