| Literature DB >> 30538258 |
Rodrigo W A Souza1, Christiano R R Alves2,3, Alessandra Medeiros4, Natale Rolim5, Gustavo J J Silva5, José B N Moreira5, Marcia N Alves5, Martin Wohlwend5, Mohammed Gebriel6, Lars Hagen6, Animesh Sharma6, Lauren G Koch7, Steven L Britton8,9, Geir Slupphaug6, Ulrik Wisløff5,10, Patricia C Brum11.
Abstract
Given the association between high aerobic capacity and the prevention of metabolic diseases, elucidating the mechanisms by which high aerobic capacity regulates whole-body metabolic homeostasis is a major research challenge. Oxidative post-translational modifications (Ox-PTMs) of proteins can regulate cellular homeostasis in skeletal and cardiac muscles, but the relationship between Ox-PTMs and intrinsic components of oxidative energy metabolism is still unclear. Here, we evaluated the Ox-PTM profile in cardiac and skeletal muscles of rats bred for low (LCR) and high (HCR) intrinsic aerobic capacity. Redox proteomics screening revealed different cysteine (Cys) Ox-PTM profile between HCR and LCR rats. HCR showed a higher number of oxidized Cys residues in skeletal muscle compared to LCR, while the opposite was observed in the heart. Most proteins with differentially oxidized Cys residues in the skeletal muscle are important regulators of oxidative metabolism. The most oxidized protein in the skeletal muscle of HCR rats was malate dehydrogenase (MDH1). HCR showed higher MDH1 activity compared to LCR in skeletal, but not cardiac muscle. These novel findings indicate a clear association between Cys Ox-PTMs and aerobic capacity, leading to novel insights into the role of Ox-PTMs as an essential signal to maintain metabolic homeostasis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30538258 PMCID: PMC6289973 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-35728-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Aerobic capacity, body mass and basal heart rate in HCR and LCR rats. (a) Maximal running speed. (b) Total running distance. (c) Basal oxygen consumption (VO2). (d) Peak oxygen consumption (VO2 peak). (e) Body mass. (f) Basal heart rate. Data are presented as mean ± SEM with dots as individual values. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 HCR as compared to LCR, n = 10.
Plantaris muscle and cardiac muscle mass and echocardiography in LCR and HCR rats.
| LCR (n = 10) | HCR (n = 10) | |
|---|---|---|
| 0.23 ± 0.01 | 0.20 ± 0.01 | |
| Left ventricle (g) | 0.54 ± 0.02 | 0.55 ± 0.01 |
| Right ventricle (g) | 0.16 ± 0.01 | 0.14 ± 0.01 |
| Atria (g) | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 0.04 ± 0.01 |
| Left ventricular anterior wall thickness in diastole (mm) | 1.47 ± 0.16 | 1.37 ± 0.11 |
| Left ventricular anterior wall thickness in systole (mm) | 2.40 ± 0.14 | 2.29 ± 0.17 |
| Left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (mm) | 6.09 ± 0.22 | 6.04 ± 0.16 |
| Left ventricular end-systolic diameter (mm) | 3.14 ± 0.24 | 3.00 ± 0.22 |
| Fractional shortening (%) | 45.68 ± 1.88 | 47.06 ± 2.78 |
| Ejection fraction (%) | 75.33 ± 2.15 | 76.57 ± 2.81 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SEM.
Figure 2Skeletal muscle metabolic phenotype in HCR and LCR rats. (a) Oxygen consumption rate in plantaris muscle fibers. (b) Complex I and (c) complex II oxygen respiratory rate in plantaris muscle fibers. (d) Citrate synthase activity in plantaris muscle. (e) Respiratory control ratio (State 3/State 4) in plantaris muscle fibers. (f) Mitochondrial complexes mRNA expression in plantaris muscle. (g) Quantification of mitochondrial complexes and representative immunoblots in plantaris muscle. (h) Total H2O2 production and (i) H2O2 production normalized by oxygen respiratory rate in plantaris muscle fibers. (j) Quantification of fluorescent dihydroethidium (DHE) oxidation products and representative images in plantaris muscle cross-sections. (k) Total glutathione and (l) oxidized glutathione (GSSG) levels in plantaris muscle. (m) SOD and (n) catalase activity. (o) Quantification of carbonyl protein levels in plantaris muscle and representative immunoblots. Data are presented as mean ± SEM *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 HCR as compared to LCR, n = 6–12.
Figure 3Heart metabolic phenotype in HCR and LCR rats. (a) Oxygen consumption rate in cardiac muscle fibers. (b) Complex I and (c) complex II oxygen respiratory rate in cardiac muscle fibers. (d) Citrate synthase activity in cardiac muscle. (e) Respiratory control ratio (State 3/State 4) in cardiac muscle fibers. (f) Quantification of mitochondrial complexes and representative immunoblots in cardiac muscle. (g) Total H2O2 production and (h) H2O2 production normalized by oxygen respiratory rate in cardiac muscle fibers. (i) Total glutathione and (j) oxidized glutathione (GSSG) levels in cardiac muscle. (k) SOD and (l) catalase maximal activity. (m) Quantification of carbonyl protein levels and representative immunoblots in cardiac muscle. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 HCR as compared to LCR, n = 6–12.
Figure 4Oxidative post-translational modifications (Ox-PTMs) of cysteine in skeletal muscle and heart in HCR and LCR rats. (a,b) Differentially redox modulated proteins (p < 0.05 and ≥1.5-fold change) in (a) plantaris muscle and (b) heart. Data are presented as log2 fold-change of HCR/LCR ratio intensity. (c) Percentage of unchanged, reduced and oxidized proteins in plantaris muscle and heart. (d,e) Pathway enrichment analysis using redox modulated (reduced and oxidized) proteins from (d) plantaris muscle and (e) heart. (f) Venn diagram with redox modulated (reduced and oxidized) proteins in plantaris muscle and heart. (g) All 15 redox modulated proteins in both plantaris muscle and heart. (h,i) Malate dehydrogenase 1 (MDH1) activity in (h) plantaris and (i) cardiac muscles. MDH1 activity data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 8 rats/group).
Top 20 redox modulated proteins in the plantaris muscle.
| Protein | ICAT-modified Cysteine | Fold change HCR/LCR |
|---|---|---|
| Malate dehydrogenase, cytoplasmic (Mdh1) | Cys137/154 | 5.01 |
| Isovaleryl-CoA dehydrogenase, mitochondrial (Ivd) | Cys353 | 4.99 |
| Sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum calcium ATPase 2 (Atp2a2) | Cys471/560/680 | 4.93 |
| Desmin (Des) | Cys337 | 4.77 |
| Elongation factor Tu, mitochondrial (Tufm) | Cys129/294 | 4.66 |
| Adenylosuccinate synthetase isozyme 1 (Adssl1) | Cys64/186 | 4.62 |
| Protein Tubb4a (Tubb4a) | Cys12/308 | 4.56 |
| Amylo-1, 6-glucosidase, 4-alpha-glucanotransferase isoform CRA_a (Agl) | Cys82/128/174/287/779 Cys972/1065/1277 | 4.56 |
| Acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase, mitochondrial (Acat1) | Cys196 | 4.51 |
| Aconitate hydratase, mitochondrial (Aco2) | Cys128/391/416/752 | 4.5 |
| Aspartate aminotransferase, cytoplasmic (Got1) | Cys84/397 | 4.49 |
| Dihydrolipoyl dehydrogenase, mitochondrial (Dld) | Cys70/492 | 4.49 |
| Myosin binding protein C, fast-type (Mybpc2) | Cys159/335/352/447/479/566 Cys622/819/1019/1041 | 4.48 |
| Cytochrome b-c1 complex subunit 1, mitochondrial (Uqcrc1) | Cys272/386/416 | 4.47 |
| Phosphoglycerate kinase 1 (Pgk1) | Cys50/321 | 4.43 |
| Methionine-R-sulfoxide reductase B1 (Msrb1) | Cys26 | −1.08 |
| NADH dehydrogenase iron-sulfur protein 2, mitochondrial (Ndufs2) | Cys352 | −1.08 |
| Tropomyosin alpha-1 chain (Tpm1) | Cys193 | −1.15 |
| Mitochondrial carrier homolog 2 (C. elegans) (Mtch2) | Cys80/99 | −3.19 |
| Transthyretin (Ttr) | Cys30 | −3.6 |
Table includes the redox ratio of individual Cys residues within those proteins. The redox state of selected redox Cys residues labeled with both light 12C-form and heavy 13C-form was calculated using the oxidation ratio (oxidized:reduced).
Top 20 redox modulated proteins in the heart.
| Protein | ICAT-modified Cysteine | Fold Change HCR/LCR |
|---|---|---|
| LETM1 and EF-hand domain-containing protein 1, mitochondrial (Letm1) | Cys560 | 1.66 |
| Sorting and assembly machinery component 50 homolog (Samm50) | Cys66 | 1.64 |
| Creatine kinase M-type (Ckm) | Cys148/258 | 1.34 |
| Hemopexin (Hpx) | Cys150/233/259/412 | 0.64 |
| Serum albumin (Alb) | Cys58/127/204/293/307/ 317/391/422/469/519/600 | −0.94 |
| Protein Ndufb10 (Ndufb10) | Cys78/127 | −0.94 |
| Mitochondrial carrier homolog 2 (C. elegans) (Mtch2) | Cys80/99 | −0.94 |
| D-dopachrome decarboxylase (Ddt) | Cys24 | −1.03 |
| Acyl-CoA synthetase family member 2, mitochondrial (Acsf2) | Cys78/469 | −1.03 |
| Aldehyde dehydrogenase, mitochondrial (Aldh2) | Cys69/394 | −1.06 |
| Carnitine O-palmitoyltransferase 2, mitochondrial (Cpt2) | Cys85/653 | −1.06 |
| NADH dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] 1 alpha subcomplex subunit 2 (Ndufa2) | Cys22/56 | −1.12 |
| F-actin-capping protein subunit beta (Capzb) | Cys63 | −1.18 |
| Catenin (Cadherin associated protein), alpha 1 (Ctnna1) | Cys118/344/536 | −1.25 |
| Myomesin 2 (Myom2) | Cys198/889/1203/1252/ 1272 | −1.29 |
| Electron transfer flavoprotein subunit beta (Etfb) | Cys42 | −1.32 |
| Isoform 2 of Adenylate kinase 2, mitochondrial (Ak2) | Cys93 | −1.4 |
| Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase A (Ppia) | Cys21/163 | −1.43 |
| Succinate-semialdehyde dehydrogenase, mitochondrial (Aldh5a1) | Cys82/333 | −1.43 |
| Acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase, mitochondrial (Acat1) | Cys117/416 | −1.84 |
Table includes the redox ratio of individual Cys residues within those proteins. The redox state of selected redox Cys residues labeled with both light 12C-form and heavy 13C-form was calculated using the oxidation ratio (oxidized:reduced).
Figure 5Proposed model for how reversible oxidative post-translational modifications (Ox-PTMs) may protect skeletal muscle from oxidative damage. Reactive cysteine thiols from a metabolic protein in HCR rats is shown with two exposed thiols (1). Oxidation by ROS can generate a sulfenic acid (2), which can be converted to irreversible sulfinic and sulfonic acid species (3). Instead, sulfonic acid can be converted to reversible forms, such as disulfides with protein (4) or disulfide with glutathione (5). Thus, by stimulating reversible oxidation processes (4 and 5), HCR rats prevents irreversible oxidation (3) in the skeletal muscle. Rat illustration was adapted from Servier Medical Art (smart.servier.com).
Primer sequences for RT-qPCR mRNA analysis.
| Target mRNA | PCR Primer sequence 5′ → 3′ | Product Size (bp) | GenBank Accession # |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ndufa9 | F: CTTCCAATGTCACGTCCTGC | 105 | NM_001100752.1 |
| R: GCCACCTTTCCCATGAGGTAT | |||
| Sdhb | F: ATGCAGAGAAGGGATCTGTGG | 90 | NM_001100539.1 |
| R: CCAAGGTCTGTGTCGATCCT | |||
| Uqcrc2 | F: CCTCAAAGTTGCCCCAAAGC | 77 | NM_001006970.1 |
| R: TGGTAAACTCAAGTTCCTGAGGC | |||
| Cox4i1 | F: GCAGCAGTGGCAGAATGTTG | 80 | NM_017202.1 |
| R: CCGAAGGCACACCGAAGTAG | |||
| Atp5a1 | F: TGAACTGTTGGGCCGTGTAG | 67 | NM_023093.1 |
| R: GGAACCAACTGGACCCTTCC | |||
| Actb | F: CCTTCTTGGGTATGGAATCCTGT | 86 | NM_031144.3 |
| R: GAGGTCTTTACGGATGTCAACG | |||
| Cyclophilin | F: TGGCAAGCATGTGGTCTTTGGGAAG | 103 | NM_017101.1 |
| R: GGTGATCTTCTTGCTGGTCTTGCCATTC | |||
| Hprt1 | F: CAGTCCCAGCGTCGTGATT | 138 | NM_012583.2 |
| R: GCAAGTCTTTCAGTCCTGTCCAT |