| Literature DB >> 30538212 |
Giuseppe Lucarelli1, Monica Rutigliano1, Fabio Sallustio2, Domenico Ribatti2, Andrea Giglio1, Martina Lepore Signorile3, Valentina Grossi3, Paola Sanese3, Anna Napoli4, Eugenio Maiorano4, Cristina Bianchi5, Roberto A Perego5, Matteo Ferro6, Elena Ranieri7, Grazia Serino8, Lauren N Bell9, Pasquale Ditonno1, Cristiano Simone3,8, Michele Battaglia1.
Abstract
An altered metabolism is involved in the development of clear cell - renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), and in this tumor many altered genes play a fundamental role in controlling cell metabolic activities. We delineated a large-scale metabolomic profile of human ccRCC, and integrated it with transcriptomic data to connect the variations in cancer metabolism with gene expression changes. Moreover, to better analyze the specific contribution of metabolic gene alterations potentially associated with tumorigenesis and tumor progression, we evaluated the transcription profile of primary renal tumor cells. Untargeted metabolomic analysis revealed a signature of an increased glucose uptake and utilization in ccRCC. In addition, metabolites related to pentose phosphate pathway were also altered in the tumor samples in association with changes in Krebs cycle intermediates and related metabolites. We identified NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) 1 alpha subcomplex 4-like 2 (NDUFA4L2) as the most highly expressed gene in renal cancer cells and evaluated its role in sustaining angiogenesis, chemoresistance, and mitochondrial dysfunction. Finally, we showed that silencing of NDUFA4L2 affects cell viability, increases mitochondrial mass, and induces ROS generation in hypoxia.Entities:
Keywords: NDUFA4L2; metabolomics; mitochondria; renal cell carcinoma; transcriptome
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30538212 PMCID: PMC6326659 DOI: 10.18632/aging.101685
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Aging (Albany NY) ISSN: 1945-4589 Impact factor: 5.682
Figure 1Volcano plot of the 516 metabolites profiled. 344 exhibited significant differential abundance when comparing ccRCC to normal kidney tissues (A). Principal component analysis (PCA) of global tissue metabolome demonstrated that the two groups (ccRCC vs normal renal tissue) were clearly distinguishable (B). ChemRICH set enrichment statistical plot. Each node reflects a significantly altered cluster of metabolites. Node sizes represent the total number of metabolites in each cluster set. The node color scale shows the proportion of increased (red) or decreased (blue) compounds in tumor compared to normal tissue. Purple color nodes have both increased and decreased metabolites (C). Hierarchical cluster analysis and heatmap of metabolite-metabolite correlation matrix. Metabolite clusters are indicated (D). Integrated metabolic pathway enrichment analysis. The stacked bars show a summary of the joint evidence from enrichment and topology analyses (E).Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) of the GSE47032 dataset (F).
Figure 2Schematic model summarizing the differences in glucose metabolism (A) and pentose phosphate pathway (B) between normal and tumor tissue.
Figure 3Schematic model summarizing the differences in tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle metabolites between normal and tumor tissue (A). Alterations in amino acid and lipid metabolism (B).
Figure 4Immunofluorescence showing the increase in MitoTracker signal levels in ccRCC cells treated with small interfering RNA targeting NDUFA4L2 (siNDUFA4L2) compared to untreated cells (A). The autophagic marker LC3 is increased in ccRCC cells and co-localizes with the mitochondrial label MitoTracker. A line profile is shown (B). NDUFA4L2-silenced cancer cells show an increased superoxide radicals production (C), high levels of phospho-H2AX (C), a significant accumulation of 8-oxodG (D), and a reactive increased expression of the DNA repair enzyme OGG1 (D). NDUFA4L2 silencing increased the membrane potential in cancer cells, as shown by increased signals of the fluorescence probe TMRE (E).
Figure 5Wounded normal and tumor cell monolayers were photographed 24 and 48 hours after the mechanical scratch and the area of the wounds was measured in 3 independent wound sites per group. When specified, the cells were treated with small interfering RNA targeting NDUFA4L2 (siNDUFA4L2). RCC cells treated with siNDUFA4L2 have decreased cell migratory capabilities compared with untreated tumor cells (A). Chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane angiogenic assay: when tumor cell are treated with siNDUFA4L2, a lower vascular reaction is detectable (B). NDUFA4L2 has a role in RCC resistance to cisplatin (CDDP)-induced cytotoxicity (C). The death rate of treated tumor cells (tumor+ siNDUFA4L2+CDDP) is significantly higher than that of untreated cells (tumor+CDDP) (P<0.001). No difference is observed in normal cells. MTT assay reveals significantly decreased cell viability when RCC cells are treated with siNDUFA4L2 before cisplatin incubation (C). RCC cells exhibit reduced levels of mitochondrial DNA, and produced lower levels of ATP, as compared to normal cells. These levels are rescued when cancer cells are treated with siNDUFA4L2 (D). NDUFA4L2 specifically inhibits mitochondrial complex I but not complex IV activity (D).
Figure 6NDUFA4L2 expression in normal (n=20) and ccRCC (n=390) specimens.
Figure 7Kaplan-Meier cancer-specific survival (CSS) (A) and progression-free survival (PFS) (B) curves, stratified by NDUFA4L2 tissue expression levels. Patients with higher NDUFA4L2 levels had reduced CSS and PFS as compared to patients with lower values.
Univariate and multivariate analyses for cancer-specific survival.
| HR (95% CI) | P-value | HR (95% CI) | P-value | ||
| T3 vs T1/2 | 3.21 (2.69-4.31) | 0.001 | 2.18 (1.22-3.18) | 0.01 | |
| N+ vs N0 | 4.12 (3.11-7.65) | 0.001 | 2.35 (1.26-5.38) | 0.001 | |
| M+ vs M0 | 6.45 (4.46-11.28) | 0.001 | 4.45 (2.74-8.15) | 0.001 | |
| G3/4 vs G1/2 | 2.34 (1.12-5.66) | 0.01 | 1.29 (1.02-2.24) | 0.01 | |
| Yes vs No | 2.12 (1.15-3.96) | 0.01 | - | - | |
| Continuous | 1.29 (1.03-2.12) | 0.01 | - | - | |
| High vs Low | 3.45 (1.14-5.78) | 0.001 | 2.11 (1.06-2.95) | 0.001 | |
Univariate and multivariate analyses for progression-free survival.
| HR (95% CI) | P-value | HR (95% CI) | P-value | ||
| T3 vs T1/2 | 5.43 (2.28-7.85) | 0.001 | 2.89 (1.56-6.43) | 0.01 | |
| N+ vs N0 | 3.74 (1.95-6.22) | 0.01 | 2.02 (1.18-5.93) | 0.01 | |
| M+ vs M0 | 5.36 (2.22-10.16) | 0.001 | 3.18 (2.01-6.31) | 0.001 | |
| G3/4 vs G1/2 | 2.43 (1.19-7.21) | 0.01 | 1.94 (1.21-3.65) | 0.01 | |
| Yes vs No | 1.85 (1.04-2.86) | 0.01 | - | - | |
| Continuous | 1.88 (1.03-2.86) | 0.01 | - | - | |
| High vs Low | 2.28 (1.16-3.18) | 0.001 | 1.96 (1.03-2.28) | 0.001 | |
Figure 8Immunoblot analysis of Caki-2 cells cultured under normoxic (21% O2) or hypoxic (1% O2) conditions for 18 hr and probed against NDUFA4L2, LC3, and TOM20 antibodies. Beta actin was used as a loading control (A). The silencing of NDUFA4L2 impairs cancer cell proliferation, inhibits the autophagic machine, and increases the levels of the mitochondrial protein TOM20, especially in hypoxic conditions (B). Cell proliferation was restored when NDUFA4L2-silenced cells were pre-treated with ascorbic acid 2-phosphate (AA2P) (B).