Literature DB >> 22430630

Serum sarcosine increases the accuracy of prostate cancer detection in patients with total serum PSA less than 4.0 ng/ml.

Giuseppe Lucarelli1, Margherita Fanelli, Angela Maria Vittoria Larocca, Cinzia Annatea Germinario, Monica Rutigliano, Antonio Vavallo, Francesco Paolo Selvaggi, Carlo Bettocchi, Michele Battaglia, Pasquale Ditonno.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sarcosine is reported to be a differential metabolite that is greatly increased during prostate cancer (PCa) progression. In this study, we assessed the role of serum sarcosine as a biomarker for PCa, as well as any association between sarcosine levels and clinical-pathological parameters.
METHODS: Sarcosine was measured by fluorometric assay in serum samples from 290 PCa patients and 312 patients with no evidence of malignancy (NEM), confirmed by 8-12 core prostate biopsies. Nonparametric statistical tests and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analyses were performed to assess the diagnostic performance of sarcosine in different (prostate-specific antigen) PSA ranges.
RESULTS: ROC analyses in subjects with PSA < 4 ng/ml showed a higher predictive value of sarcosine (AUC = 0.668) versus total PSA (AUC = 0.535) (P = 0.03), whereas for the other two PSA ranges (4-10 ng/ml and >10 ng/ml), percent ratio of free to total PSA (%fPSA) showed a predictive superiority over sarcosine. Moreover, in patients with a PSA < 4 ng/ml, the percentage of low/intermediate-grade cancers was positively associated with sarcosine levels (P = 0.005). The specificities for serum sarcosine, %fPSA, PSA, and the logistic regression model at 95% sensitivity were 24.4, 3.41, 2.22, and 28.4%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: We provide evidence that serum sarcosine has a higher predictive value than tPSA and %fPSA in patients with PSA < 4 ng/ml. Moreover, sarcosine levels were significantly different in low grade versus high grade cancers in this subset of patients, suggesting that this marker may be a further tool not only for diagnosing PCa in normal PSA and abnormal DRE/TRUS patients but also for selecting candidates for non-aggressive therapies and active surveillance.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22430630     DOI: 10.1002/pros.22514

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate        ISSN: 0270-4137            Impact factor:   4.104


  35 in total

Review 1.  Applications of metabolomics to study cancer metabolism.

Authors:  Akash K Kaushik; Ralph J DeBerardinis
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 10.680

2.  Loss of STK11 expression is an early event in prostate carcinogenesis and predicts therapeutic response to targeted therapy against MAPK/p38.

Authors:  Valentina Grossi; Giuseppe Lucarelli; Giovanna Forte; Alessia Peserico; Antonio Matrone; Aldo Germani; Monica Rutigliano; Alessandro Stella; Rosanna Bagnulo; Daria Loconte; Vanessa Galleggiante; Francesca Sanguedolce; Simona Cagiano; Pantaleo Bufo; Senia Trabucco; Eugenio Maiorano; Pasquale Ditonno; Michele Battaglia; Nicoletta Resta; Cristiano Simone
Journal:  Autophagy       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 16.016

Review 3.  Circulating metabolite biomarkers: a game changer in the human prostate cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Sabareeswaran Krishnan; Shruthi Kanthaje; Devasya Rekha Punchappady; M Mujeeburahiman; Chandrahas Koumar Ratnacaram
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  TMPRSS2-ERG fusion transcripts expression in patients referred for prostate biopsy: combining detection in urine and needle rinse material.

Authors:  Nicolas Barry Delongchamps; Patrick Younes; Lydie Denjean; Marc Zerbib; Phuong-Nhi Bories
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-07-05       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  Regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor by metabolic context of the cell.

Authors:  V B Sameer Kumar; S Binu; S J Soumya; Haritha K; P R Sudhakaran
Journal:  Glycoconj J       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.916

6.  Prospective evaluation of serum sarcosine and risk of prostate cancer in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial.

Authors:  Stella Koutros; Tamra E Meyer; Stephen D Fox; Haleem J Issaq; Timothy D Veenstra; Wen-Yi Huang; Kai Yu; Demetrius Albanes; Lisa W Chu; Gerald Andriole; Robert N Hoover; Ann W Hsing; Sonja I Berndt
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 4.944

7.  Oxidative stress measured by thioredoxin reductase level as potential biomarker for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Weibing Zhang; Xinming Zheng; Xinghuan Wang
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 6.166

8.  The role of sarcosine metabolism in prostate cancer progression.

Authors:  Amjad P Khan; Thekkelnaycke M Rajendiran; Bushra Ateeq; Irfan A Asangani; Jyoti N Athanikar; Anastasia K Yocum; Rohit Mehra; Javed Siddiqui; Ganesh Palapattu; John T Wei; George Michailidis; Arun Sreekumar; Arul M Chinnaiyan
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 5.715

Review 9.  Biomarkers in localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Matteo Ferro; Carlo Buonerba; Daniela Terracciano; Giuseppe Lucarelli; Vincenzo Cosimato; Danilo Bottero; Victor M Deliu; Pasquale Ditonno; Sisto Perdonà; Riccardo Autorino; Ioman Coman; Sabino De Placido; Giuseppe Di Lorenzo; Ottavio De Cobelli
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 3.404

10.  Application of Holistic Liquid Chromatography-High Resolution Mass Spectrometry Based Urinary Metabolomics for Prostate Cancer Detection and Biomarker Discovery.

Authors:  Tong Zhang; David G Watson; Lijie Wang; Muhammad Abbas; Laura Murdoch; Lisa Bashford; Imran Ahmad; Nga-Yee Lam; Anthony C F Ng; Hing Y Leung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.