PURPOSE: To investigate the use and efficiency of 3-D deep learning, fully convolutional networks (DFCN) for simultaneous tumor cosegmentation on dual-modality nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and positron emission tomography (PET)-computed tomography (CT) images. METHODS: We used DFCN cosegmentation for NSCLC tumors in PET-CT images, considering both the CT and PET information. The proposed DFCN-based cosegmentation method consists of two coupled three-dimensional (3D)-UNets with an encoder-decoder architecture, which can communicate with the other in order to share complementary information between PET and CT. The weighted average sensitivity and positive predictive values denoted as Scores, dice similarity coefficients (DSCs), and the average symmetric surface distances were used to assess the performance of the proposed approach on 60 pairs of PET/CTs. A Simultaneous Truth and Performance Level Estimation Algorithm (STAPLE) of 3 expert physicians' delineations were used as a reference. The proposed DFCN framework was compared to 3 graph-based cosegmentation methods. RESULTS: Strong agreement was observed when using the STAPLE references for the proposed DFCN cosegmentation on the PET-CT images. The average DSCs on CT and PET are 0.861 ± 0.037 and 0.828 ± 0.087, respectively, using DFCN, compared to 0.638 ± 0.165 and 0.643 ± 0.141, respectively, when using the graph-based cosegmentation method. The proposed DFCN cosegmentation using both PET and CT also outperforms the deep learning method using either PET or CT alone. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed DFCN cosegmentation is able to outperform existing graph-based segmentation methods. The proposed DFCN cosegmentation shows promise for further integration with quantitative multimodality imaging tools in clinical trials.
PURPOSE: To investigate the use and efficiency of 3-D deep learning, fully convolutional networks (DFCN) for simultaneous tumor cosegmentation on dual-modality nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and positron emission tomography (PET)-computed tomography (CT) images. METHODS: We used DFCN cosegmentation for NSCLC tumors in PET-CT images, considering both the CT and PET information. The proposed DFCN-based cosegmentation method consists of two coupled three-dimensional (3D)-UNets with an encoder-decoder architecture, which can communicate with the other in order to share complementary information between PET and CT. The weighted average sensitivity and positive predictive values denoted as Scores, dice similarity coefficients (DSCs), and the average symmetric surface distances were used to assess the performance of the proposed approach on 60 pairs of PET/CTs. A Simultaneous Truth and Performance Level Estimation Algorithm (STAPLE) of 3 expert physicians' delineations were used as a reference. The proposed DFCN framework was compared to 3 graph-based cosegmentation methods. RESULTS: Strong agreement was observed when using the STAPLE references for the proposed DFCN cosegmentation on the PET-CT images. The average DSCs on CT and PET are 0.861 ± 0.037 and 0.828 ± 0.087, respectively, using DFCN, compared to 0.638 ± 0.165 and 0.643 ± 0.141, respectively, when using the graph-based cosegmentation method. The proposed DFCN cosegmentation using both PET and CT also outperforms the deep learning method using either PET or CT alone. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed DFCN cosegmentation is able to outperform existing graph-based segmentation methods. The proposed DFCN cosegmentation shows promise for further integration with quantitative multimodality imaging tools in clinical trials.
Authors: Walter Jentzen; Lutz Freudenberg; Ernst G Eising; Melanie Heinze; Wolfgang Brandau; Andreas Bockisch Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Wei Chen; Timothy Cloughesy; Nirav Kamdar; Nagichettiar Satyamurthy; Marvin Bergsneider; Linda Liau; Paul Mischel; Johannes Czernin; Michael E Phelps; Daniel H S Silverman Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Jana L Fox; Ramesh Rengan; William O'Meara; Ellen Yorke; Yusuf Erdi; Sadek Nehmeh; Steven A Leibel; Kenneth E Rosenzweig Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2005-05-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Issam El Naqa; Deshan Yang; Aditya Apte; Divya Khullar; Sasa Mutic; Jie Zheng; Jeffrey D Bradley; Perry Grigsby; Joseph O Deasy Journal: Med Phys Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Stephen Baek; Yusen He; Bryan G Allen; John M Buatti; Brian J Smith; Ling Tong; Zhiyu Sun; Jia Wu; Maximilian Diehn; Billy W Loo; Kristin A Plichta; Steven N Seyedin; Maggie Gannon; Katherine R Cabel; Yusung Kim; Xiaodong Wu Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-11-21 Impact factor: 4.379