| Literature DB >> 30535238 |
Mahwesh Saleem1, Nathan Herrmann1,2, Adam Dinoff1, Susan Marzolini3, Michelle M Mielke4,5, Ana Andreazza6, Paul I Oh3,7, Swarajya Lakshmi Vattem Venkata8, Norman J Haughey8,9, Krista L Lanctôt1,2,3,10.
Abstract
The long-term benefits conferred by cardiac rehabilitation (CR) in those with coronary artery disease (CAD) are strongly linked with an improvement in cardiopulmonary fitness. This study aimed to determine the association between peripheral sphingolipids and cardiopulmonary fitness in CAD subjects undertaking CR. Patients with CAD (n = 100, mean age = 64 ± 6 years, 85% male, mean years of education = 17 ± 3 years) underwent 6 months of CR with blood collected at baseline, 3 and 6 months. Cardiopulmonary fitness was assessed by measuring peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) at all time points. High performance liquid chromatography coupled electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry was used to quantify plasma sphingolipid concentrations. Cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between sphingolipids and VO2peak were assessed using linear regressions and mixed models, respectively. Higher concentrations of sphingomyelin C18:1 (β = -0.26, p = .01), ceramides C16:0 (β = -0.24, p = .02), C18:0 (β = -0.29, p = .002), C20:0 (β = -0.24, p = .02) and C24:1 (β = -0.24, p = .01) and monohexylceramide C18:0 (β = -0.23, p = .02) were associated with poorer VO2peak at baseline. An improvement in VO2peak was associated with a decrease in sphingomyelin C18:1 (b = -10.09, p = .006), ceramides C16:0 (b = -9.25, p = .0003), C18:0 (b = -5.44, p = .0003) and C24:1 (b = -2.46, p = .006) and monohexylceramide C18:0 (b = -5.37, p = .005). Specific long chain sphingolipids may be useful markers of fitness and response to exercise in CAD.Entities:
Keywords: Cardiovascular disease; Ceramide; Exercise; Sphingomyelin
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 30535238 PMCID: PMC7931966 DOI: 10.1093/gerona/gly273
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci ISSN: 1079-5006 Impact factor: 6.591
Physiological and Cardiopulmonary Characteristics of Study Participants (n = 100) and Associations With VO2peak at Baseline and Change in VO2peak More Than 6 Months of Cardiac Rehabilitation
| Baseline | 3 Mo | 6 Mo | Association With VO2peak at Baseline | Association With Change in VO2peak | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | Mean ± |
|
|
|
| ||
| Anthropometric characteristics | |||||||
| Body mass index, kg/m2 | 28.5 ± 4.5 | 28.2 ± 4.0 | 28.0 ± 4.9 | −.27 | .007* | −0.39 | <.0001* |
| Percentage body fat | 30.4 ± 8.3 | 29.4 ± 8.0 | 28.0 ± 8.2 | −.29 | .004* | −0.32 | <.0001* |
| Waist circumference, cm | 97.5 ± 10.4 | 97.0 ± 12.8 | 95.5 ± 11.0 | −.24 | .02* | −0.14 | <.0001* |
| Resting physiology | |||||||
| Heart rate, bpm | 68 ± 12 | 66 ± 11 | 66 ± 10 | −.15 | .15 | −0.08 | .02* |
| Systolic blood pressure, mmHg | 125 ± 17 | 122 ± 14 | 121 ± 16 | −.06 | .58 | −0.07 | .01* |
| Diastolic blood pressure, mmHg | 77 ± 9 | 75 ± 8 | 76 ± 8 | −.09 | .36 | −0.02 | .72 |
| Fitness parameters | |||||||
| Maximum heart rate, bpm | 123 ± 20 | 129 ± 20 | 133 ± 24 | .47 | <.0001* | 0.15 | <.0001* |
| Maximum systolic blood pressure, mmHg | 170 ± 24 | 172 ± 24 | 176 ± 22 | .17 | .09 | 0.05 | .005* |
| Maximum diastolic blood pressure, mmHg | 78 ± 11 | 77 ± 10 | 78 ± 10 | −.21 | .04* | −0.06 | .11 |
| VO2peak, mL/kg/min | 21.7 ± 5.5 | 25.3 ± 6.4 | 27.4 ± 6.9 | ||||
| Fraction of norm VO2peak | 0.89 ± 0.24 | 1.04 ± 0.25 | 1.10 ± 0.25 | ||||
*p < .05.
Cross-sectional and Longitudinal Associations Between Individual Sphingolipids (SPH) and VO2peak in Coronary Artery Disease Patients Undergoing 6 Months of Cardiac Rehabilitation
| SPH | Lipid | SPH × VO2peak at Baseline (Diagnostic) | Baseline SPH × Change in VO2peak | Change in SPH × Change in VO2peak | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β |
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Sphingomyelins | C18:0 | −0.19 | .05 | −7.27 | .09 | −7.28 | .07 |
| C16:1 | −0.05 | .70 | −5.21 | .26 | −2.86 | .54 | |
| C18:1 | −0.26 | .01*# | −11.94 | .001*# | −10.09 | .006*# | |
| C20:1 | −5.30 | .18 | −3.86 | .28 | |||
| C22:1 | 8.29 | .17 | |||||
| Ceramides | C16:0 | −0.24 | .02*# | −9.54 | .001*# | −9.25 | .0003*# |
| C18:0 | −0.29 | .002*# | −5.11 | .001*# | −5.44 | .0003*# | |
| C20:0 | −0.24 | .02*# | −5.79 | .004*# | |||
| C22:1 | −3.33 | .09 | |||||
| C24:1 | −0.24 | .01*# | −2.39 | .008*# | −2.46 | .006*# | |
| Monohexylceramides | C18:0 | −0.23 | .02*# | −6.05 | .002*# | −5.37 | .005*# |
| C20:0 | −3.86 | .11 | |||||
| Lactosylceramides | C22:0 | −5.75 | .02*# | ||||
| C26:1 | 2.05 | .09 | |||||
| Sphingosine-1-phosphate | S1P | −1.22 | .32 | ||||
Note: Multivariate linear regressions and mixed models used to assess cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between individual sphingolipids and VO2peak, respectively. Only values for sphingolipid species that were significantly associated with VO2peak in diagnostic, prognostic, and response bivariate analyses are shown.
*p < .05; #p < .05 at Benjamini–Hochberg procedure.
Figure 1.Associations between plasma sphingolipids and cardiopulmonary fitness at baseline. VO2peak is based on predicted values obtained in linear regression models with sphingolipid concentrations predicting VO2peak controlling for additional covariates (p < .05).
Figure 2.Associations between change in plasma sphingolipids and change in cardiopulmonary fitness over 6 months of cardiac rehabilitation. VO2peak is based on predicted values obtained in mixed models with sphingolipid concentrations predicting VO2peak controlling for additional covariates (p < .05).