Literature DB >> 30535034

Effects of litter floor access and inclusion of experienced hens in aviary housing on floor eggs, litter condition, air quality, and hen welfare.

Jofran L Oliveira1, Hongwei Xin1,2, Lilong Chai3, Suzanne T Millman4.   

Abstract

With different cage-free (CF) housing styles and management schemes, retailers have developed their own CF criteria. One highly debated aspect is if hens may be kept inside the system for part of the day-during the first few hours after lights-on. Research is lacking regarding the impacts of such a practice on hen welfare, incidence of eggs laid on the litter floor, litter condition, and air quality. This 14-mo field study was conducted to help assess such impacts. Hens (Dekalb White) in an aviary house (50,000-hen nominal capacity) were allowed to have full litter access (FLA) vs. part-time litter access (PLA) from 10:50 am to 9:00 pm, coupled with the absence or presence of experienced hens (1.5% of the population), hence a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement. The measured variables included a) incidence of floor eggs, b) percentage of birds remaining on litter floor at night, c) mortality, d) body weight (BW) and BW uniformity, e) litter condition (depth, moisture content, texture, amount removed, and bacteria concentration), f) environmental conditions, and g) welfare conditions (10 variables). Compared to FLA, PLA had a significantly lower incidence of floor eggs (1.4 ± 0.1 vs. 12.6 ± 1.1 eggs per hen housed as of 76 weeks of age (WOA), i.e., approximately 89% reduction), less manure deposition on the floor (0.53 ± 0.02 vs. 1.05 ± 0.04 kg/100 hens/d, dry basis, i.e., approximately 50% reduction), and lower ammonia concentrations due to drier litter (averaging 22% lower). Inclusion of 1.5% experienced hens in the young flock did not show benefit of reducing the incidence of floor eggs (P = 0.48). The percentage of hens remaining on the floor at night was low (< 0.01%) in all cases from 24 WOA onward. No differences were detected between FLA and PLA in hen welfare conditions, mortality, BW, BW uniformity, bacteria concentration in the litter, air temperature, or relative humidity.
© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Poultry Science Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  air quality; animal welfare; food safety; poultry management

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30535034      PMCID: PMC6414038          DOI: 10.3382/ps/pey525

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  4 in total

1.  Effects of ground robot manipulation on hen floor egg reduction, production performance, stress response, bone quality, and behavior.

Authors:  Guoming Li; Xue Hui; Yang Zhao; Wei Zhai; Joseph L Purswell; Zach Porter; Sabin Poudel; Linan Jia; Bo Zhang; Gary D Chesser
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Evaluating Convolutional Neural Networks for Cage-Free Floor Egg Detection.

Authors:  Guoming Li; Yan Xu; Yang Zhao; Qian Du; Yanbo Huang
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  Heritability of perching behavior and its genetic relationship with incidence of floor eggs in Rhode Island Red chickens.

Authors:  Anna Wolc; Petek Settar; Janet E Fulton; Jesus Arango; Kaylee Rowland; Danny Lubritz; Jack C M Dekkers
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 4.297

4.  Yield Performance, Laying Behaviour Traits and Egg Quality of Purebred and Hybrid Hens Reared under Outdoor Conditions.

Authors:  Chiara Rizzi
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 2.752

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.