Literature DB >> 35452500

Effects of ground robot manipulation on hen floor egg reduction, production performance, stress response, bone quality, and behavior.

Guoming Li1,2, Xue Hui3, Yang Zhao4, Wei Zhai5, Joseph L Purswell6, Zach Porter1, Sabin Poudel5, Linan Jia5, Bo Zhang5, Gary D Chesser1.   

Abstract

Reducing floor eggs in cage-free (CF) housing systems is among primary concerns for egg producers. The objective of this research was to evaluate the effects of ground robot manipulation on reduction of floor eggs. In addition, the effects of ground robot manipulation on production performance, stress response, bone quality, and behavior were also investigated. Two successive flocks of 180 Hy-Line Brown hens at 34 weeks of this age were used. The treatment structure for each flock consisted of six pens with three treatments (without robot running, with one-week robot running, and with two-weeks robot running), resulting in two replicates per treatment per flock and four replicates per treatment with two flocks. Two phases were involved with each flock. Phase 1 (weeks 35-38) mimicked the normal scenario, and phase 2 (weeks 40-43) mimicked a scenario after inadvertent restriction to nest box access. Results indicate that the floor egg reduction rate in the first two weeks of phase 1 was 11.0% without the robot treatment, 18.9% with the one-week robot treatment, and 34.0% with the two-week robot treatment. The effect of robot operation on floor egg production was not significant when the two phases of data were included in the analysis. Other tested parameters were similar among the treatments, including hen-day egg production, feed intake, feed conversion ratio, live body weight, plasma corticosterone concentration, bone breaking force, ash percentage, and time spent in nest boxes. In conclusion, ground robot operation in CF settings may help to reduce floor egg production to a certain degree for a short period right after being introduced. Additionally, robot operation does not seem to negatively affect hen production performance and well-being.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35452500      PMCID: PMC9032375          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267568

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.752


  20 in total

1.  Use of perches and nestboxes by laying hens in relation to social status, based on examination of consistency of ranking orders and frequency of interaction.

Authors:  L S. Cordiner; C J. Savory
Journal:  Appl Anim Behav Sci       Date:  2001-03-29       Impact factor: 2.448

2.  Selective breeding of chickens for corticosterone response to social stress.

Authors:  W B Gross; P B Siegel
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Relationship between plasma and tissue corticosterone in laying hens (Gallus gallus domesticus): implications for stress physiology and animal welfare.

Authors:  C R Ralph; P H Hemsworth; B J Leury; A J Tilbrook
Journal:  Domest Anim Endocrinol       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 2.290

4.  Temporal and sequential structure of behavior and facility usage of laying hens in an enriched environment.

Authors:  A Mishra; P Koene; W Schouten; B Spruijt; P van Beek; J H M Metz
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Effects of stock density on the laying performance, blood parameter, corticosterone, litter quality, gas emission and bone mineral density of laying hens in floor pens.

Authors:  H K Kang; S B Park; S H Kim; C H Kim
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Corticosteroids and other indicators of hens' well-being in four laying-house environments.

Authors:  J V Craig; J A Craig; J Vargas Vargas
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  End-of-cycle bone quality in white- and brown-egg laying hens.

Authors:  C M Riczu; J L Saunders-Blades; A K Yngvesson; F E Robinson; D R Korver
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  The behaviour of commercial broilers in response to a mobile robot.

Authors:  I C Dennis; S M Abeyesinghe; T G M Demmers
Journal:  Br Poult Sci       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 2.095

Review 9.  Review of rearing-related factors affecting the welfare of laying hens.

Authors:  Andrew M Janczak; Anja B Riber
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2015-05-25       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Evaluating Convolutional Neural Networks for Cage-Free Floor Egg Detection.

Authors:  Guoming Li; Yan Xu; Yang Zhao; Qian Du; Yanbo Huang
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.