| Literature DB >> 30534056 |
Si Zhang1, Junhao Hu1, Weijie Fan1, Bo Liu1, Li Wen1, Guangxian Wang1, Mingfu Gong1, Chunyan Yang1, Dong Zhang1.
Abstract
Background: Early postmenopausal women frequently suffer from cognitive impairments and emotional disorders, such as lack of attention, poor memory, deficits in executive function and depression. However, the underlying mechanisms of these impairments remain unclear. Method: Forty-three early postmenopausal women and forty-four age-matched premenopausal controls underwent serum sex hormone analysis, neuropsychological testing and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI). Degree centrality (DC) analysis was performed to confirm the peak points of the functionally abnormal brain areas as the centers of the seeds. Subsequently, the functional connectivity (FC) between these abnormal seeds and other voxels across the whole brain was calculated. Finally, the sex hormone levels, neuroimaging indices and neuropsychological data were combined to detect potential correlations.Entities:
Keywords: cognition; degree centrality; early postmenopausal women; emotion; functional connectivity; resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI)
Year: 2018 PMID: 30534056 PMCID: PMC6275219 DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2018.00454
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Neurosci ISSN: 1662-5102 Impact factor: 5.505
Demographic, clinical characteristics, mood and cognitive performance data.
| Characteristic | Postmenopausal women | Premenopausal women | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 43 | 44 | ||
| Age (years) | 47.37 ± 1.59 | 46.98 ± 1.61 | 0.252a |
| Edu (years) | 13.60 ± 1.51 | 13.36 ± 1.51 | 0.459a |
| FSH | 52.82 ± 24.86 | 4.87 ± 3.26 | <0.001a |
| KI | 13.19 ± 7.41 | 8.59 ± 5.58 | 0.002a |
| BDI-II | 18.09 ± 7.05 | 7.91 ± 8.29 | <0.001a |
| SAS | 41.35 ± 9.01 | 41.39 ± 7.51 | 0.744a |
| PSQI | 9.00 ± 3.64 | 5.00 ± 3.33 | <0.001a |
| ANT | |||
| Alerting (ms) | 48.12 ± 22.79 | 37.74 ± 21.94 | 0.033a |
| Orienting (ms) | 40.03 ± 22.03 | 34.84 ± 21.87 | 0.273a |
| Executive control (ms) | 128.24 ± 36.69 | 109.39 ± 32.10 | 0.010a |
| One-Back | |||
| ACC | 0.9149 ± 0.0544 | 0.9525 ± 0.0227 | <0.001b |
| RT (ms) | 1096.98 ± 312.48 | 969.07 ± 192.16 | 0.024a |
| Stroop Test | |||
| ACC | 0.8407 ± 0.1079 | 0.9266 ± 0.0913 | <0.001b |
| RT (ms) | 836.04 ± 127.36 | 763.94 ± 85.78 | 0.003a |
Abbreviations: Edu, education; FSH, follicle-stimulating hormone; KI. Kupperman index; BDI-II, Beck depression inventory II; SAS, self-rating anxiety scale; PSQI, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; ANT, Attention Network Task; ACC, accuracy rating; RT, reaction time. .
Figure 1Significantly increased (red) and decreased (blue) degree centrality (DC) in early postmenopausal women compared with controls (the peak level threshold was set at p = 0.001; cluster level false discovery rate (FDR)-corrected p < 0.05 or Small-volume corrected, familywise error (FWE)-corrected at p < 0.05 with a cluster size threshold of 20 contiguous voxels). The color bar indicates the t-value from the two-sample t-test between the two groups.
DC alterations between the two groups.
| MNI peak point coordinates | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brain region | BA | Voxels | ||||
| AMYG.Lb | 35 | −24 | −3 | −27 | 4.0298 | 45 |
| MOG.La | 18 | −12 | −99 | 12 | −4.963 | 61 |
| MOG.Rb | 19 | 9 | −96 | 12 | −4.1971 | 37 |
Notes: MNI, Montreal Neurological Institute space; DC, degree centrality; BA, Brodmann’s area; AMYG.L, left amygdala; MOG.L, left middle occipital gyrus; MOG.R, right middle occipital gyrus. .
FC alterations between the two groups.
| MNI coordinates | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Connected regions | BA | Peak areas | Voxels | ||||
| Seed point (−24, −3, −27) | |||||||
| 13 | INS.Lb | −30 | −33 | 9 | 3.7447 | 38 | |
| 9/10 | Bilateral PFCb | 0 | 54 | 33 | 3.9359 | 39 | |
| 10 | SFG.Rb | 3 | −6 | 78 | 4.1754 | 78 | |
| 17 | IOG.Lb | −18 | −99 | −15 | 3.6212 | 29 | |
| Seed point (−12, −99, 12) | |||||||
| 19 | MOG.La | −21 | −72 | 0 | −4.6295 | 196 | |
| 18 | MOG.Ra | 18 | −75 | 9 | −4.59 | 183 | |
| 10 | SFG.Rb | 21 | 63 | 18 | −4.3991 | 25 | |
| 2 | IPG.La | −39 | −30 | 36 | −3.9269 | 122 | |
| 6 | MFG.Lb | −33 | 3 | 54 | −3.8833 | 51 | |
| 5 | SFG.Rb | 6 | −42 | 63 | −3.6806 | 40 | |
| Seed point (9, −96, 12) | |||||||
| 20 | MTG.Ra | 60 | −45 | −24 | −4.1129 | 149 | |
| 47 | IFG.Rb | 42 | 30 | −21 | −4.0295 | 44 | |
| 17 | MOG.La | −18 | −102 | −3 | −4.0609 | 168 | |
| 18 | MOG.Rb | 18 | −102 | −9 | −3.7911 | 76 | |
| 10 | SFG.Ra | 18 | 57 | 21 | −4.2723 | 127 | |
| 2 | IPG.Lb | −39 | −30 | 36 | −3.8902 | 70 | |
| 9 | MFG.Rb | 36 | 18 | 42 | −4.167 | 44 | |
| 7 | SPG.Lb | −30 | −57 | 66 | −4.299 | 77 | |
Notes: FC, functional connectivity; INS.L, left insula; bilateral PFC, bilateral prefrontal cortex; SFG.R, right superior frontal gyrus; IOG.L, left inferior occipital gyrus; IPG.L, left inferior parietal gyrus; MFG.L, left middle frontal gyrus; MTG.R, right middle temporal gyrus; IFG.R, right inferior frontal gyrus; MFG.R, right middle frontal gyrus; SPG.L, left superior parietal gyrus; FEW, familywise error. .
Figure 2Differences in left amygdala (AMYG.L) based functional connectivity (FC) between early postmenopausal women and controls (the peak level threshold was set at p = 0.001, small-volume correction (SVC)-corrected; FWE-corrected at p < 0.05). All the FC strengths were increased and marked in red.
Figure 3Differences in left middle occipital gyrus (MOG.L) based FC between early postmenopausal women and controls (the peak level threshold was set at p = 0.001; cluster level FDR-corrected p < 0.05 or Small-volume corrected, FWE-corrected at p < 0.05 with a cluster size threshold of 20 contiguous voxels). All the FC strengths were decreased and marked in blue.
Figure 4Differences in right middle occipital gyrus (MOG.R) based FC between early postmenopausal women and controls (the peak level threshold was set at p = 0.001; cluster level FDR-corrected p < 0.05 or Small-volume corrected, FWE-corrected at p < 0.05 with a cluster size threshold of 20 contiguous voxels). All the FC strengths were decreased and marked in blue.
Figure 5Scatter diagrams showing the significant pair-wise correlations between abnormal DC, rsFC, clinical and neuropsychological data in early postmenopausal women in (A–F). (A) The serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) level was negatively correlated with the working memory accuracy rate. (B) The executive function accuracy rate was positively correlated with the increased FC strength between the AMYG.L and bilateral prefrontal cortex (PFC). (C,D) The increased FC strength between the AMYG.L and left insula (INS.L) was simultaneously positively correlated with the BDI-II and pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) score. (E) The working memory reaction time (RT) was negatively correlated with the decreased FC strength between the MOG.L and left inferior parietal gyrus (IPG.L.) (F) The working memory RT was negatively correlated with the decreased FC strength between the MOG.R and IPG.L.