Literature DB >> 30533882

Draft Genome Sequences of the Highly Halotolerant Strain Zygosaccharomyces rouxii ATCC 42981 and the Novel Allodiploid Strain Zygosaccharomyces sapae ATB301T Obtained Using the MinION Platform.

Melissa Bizzarri1, Stefano Cassanelli1, Leszek P Pryszcz2, Jan Gawor3, Robert Gromadka3, Lisa Solieri1.   

Abstract

Here, we report draft genome sequences of the halotolerant and allodiploid strains Zygosaccharomyces rouxii ATCC 42981 and Zygosaccharomyces sapae ABT301T. Illumina and Oxford Nanopore MinION sequencing revealed genome sizes of 20.9 and 24.7 Mb, respectively. This information will be useful for deciphering the genetics of hybrid adaptation to high salt and sugar concentrations in nonconventional yeasts.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30533882      PMCID: PMC6256427          DOI: 10.1128/MRA.00874-18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microbiol Resour Announc        ISSN: 2576-098X


ANNOUNCEMENT

The halotolerant yeasts of the genus Zygosaccharomyces find relevant applications in food spoilage and fermentation (1). They exhibit high diversity in response to high solute concentrations, tendency to hybridization, and ectopic recombination at the mating type loci, leading to ploidy and karyotype variation (2, 3). Zygosaccharomyces rouxii ATCC 42981 is an allodiploid strain isolated from Japanese miso, which grows at NaCl and dextrose concentrations up to 3.0 M and 70% (wt/vol), respectively (4). Zygosaccharomyces sapae represents a novel species, first described in high-sugar traditional balsamic vinegar (TBV), for which ABT301 (= CBS 12607T = MUCL 54092T = UMCC 152T) is the type strain (5). ABT301T is a sugar-resistant and slow-growing strain more sensitive to salt than is ATCC 42981. Under standard conditions, ATCC 42981 produces more glycerol than does ABT301T and better retains it in the cell under conditions of salt stress (6). ATCC 42981 is thought to have arisen from hybridization between two divergent parents (3, 5, 7–9), while no evidence about the origin of strain ABT301T is available. Here, we present the draft genome sequences of ATCC 42981 and ABT301T. Single-colony isolates were obtained from the Unimore Microbial Culture Collection (UMCC) of the University of Modena and Reggio Emilia in Italy. ABT301T was isolated from a TBV sample in May to June 2004 (10). DNA was extracted by using the phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol method (11) after cell wall enzymatic lysis with 300 U lyticase (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) and subjected to short-read and long-read sequencing by using the MiSeq (Illumina) and MinION (ONT) platforms. Illumina libraries were prepared with an average insert size of ∼600 bp and sequenced in paired-end mode on a MiSeq instrument using a v3 600-cycle chemistry kit. In total, 2,234,027 and 3,452,971 short paired-end reads were generated for ATCC 42981 and ABT301T, respectively. MinION libraries were prepared from unsheared genomic DNA using a 1D ligation sequencing kit with modifications included in the One-Pot ligation manual (https://doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.k9acz2e). Genomes were sequenced separately on a MinION MkIb instrument using SQK-LSK108 chemistry and R9.4.1 flow cells. Total numbers of 260,559 and 197,963 long reads were generated for ATCC 42981 and ABT301T, respectively. They were basecalled with Albacore v2.1.7, quality trimmed with PoreChop v0.2.1 (https://github.com/rrwick/Porechop) and error corrected with Canu v1.7 (12). Platanus v1.2.4 (13) was used to assemble the initial contigs, which were subsequently scaffolded with corrected MinION reads using DBG2OLC (14). Finally, scaffolds were polished with long reads using Racon v1.2.0 (15) and with short reads using Pilon v1.22 (16) and then reduced using Redundans v.014 (17). All software programs were used at default settings. Genes were annotated by similarity to the closest haploid relative, Z. rouxii CBS 732T (18), using Exonerate v2.2.0 (19). Assembly completeness was assessed by BUSCO v3.0.2 (20). Comparison with haploid CBS 732T showed that the ATCC 42981 and ABT301T assembled genomes had a 2.14 and 2.53 times larger assembly size and contained a 2.11 and 2.46 times higher number of protein-coding genes, respectively (Table 1). For both genomes we dissected three haplotypes, and one of them was identical to that of CBS 732T (identity cutoff, 0.92). The data suggest a recursive hybridization model (21). The reported assemblies will decipher how hybridization, followed by functional genome stabilization, may offer a rapid adaptation strategy to salt stress environments in yeasts.
TABLE 1

Assembly metrics and annotation completeness obtained by using the BUSCO universal fungal genes (fungi_odb9) data set

FeatureData for strain:
CBS 732TABT301TATCC 42981
Assembly size (bp)9,764,63524,741,99320,910,059
No. of scaffolds75233
G+C content (%)39.1339.5739.65
N50 contig size (bp)1,496,3421,409,6191,393,912
N90 contig size (bp)1,114,666146,869400,395
No. of gaps1,26900
Longest scaffold (bp)1,865,3921,913,6121,903,919
No. of genes4,99112,30010,524
No. of BUSCO complete genes (%)285 (98.28)282 (97.24)285 (98.28)
No. of BUSCO duplicated genes (%)0 (0)240 (85.11)264 (92.63)
Assembly metrics and annotation completeness obtained by using the BUSCO universal fungal genes (fungi_odb9) data set

Data availability.

The BioProject has been deposited in GenBank under number PRJEB26771. All sequencing reads of Z. rouxii ATCC 42981 and Z. sapae ABT301T have been deposited at EMBL/GenBank under the accession numbers UEMZ01000001 to UEMZ01000033 and UEGL01000001 to UEGL01000052, respectively.
  21 in total

1.  BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs.

Authors:  Felipe A Simão; Robert M Waterhouse; Panagiotis Ioannidis; Evgenia V Kriventseva; Evgeny M Zdobnov
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Mechanism for Restoration of Fertility in Hybrid Zygosaccharomyces rouxii Generated by Interspecies Hybridization.

Authors:  Jun Watanabe; Kenji Uehara; Yoshinobu Mogi; Yuichiro Tsukioka
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Molecular assessment of indigenous yeast population from traditional balsamic vinegar.

Authors:  L Solieri; S Landi; L De Vero; P Giudici
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.772

4.  Molecular evidence for the existence of natural hybrids in the genus Zygosaccharomyces.

Authors:  Stephen A James; Christopher J Bond; Malcolm Stratford; Ian N Roberts
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 5.  Adaptive response and tolerance to sugar and salt stress in the food yeast Zygosaccharomyces rouxii.

Authors:  Tikam Chand Dakal; Lisa Solieri; Paolo Giudici
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2014-05-25       Impact factor: 5.277

6.  Quantitative phenotypic analysis of multistress response in Zygosaccharomyces rouxii complex.

Authors:  Lisa Solieri; Tikam C Dakal; Silvio Bicciato
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 2.796

7.  Comparative genomics of protoploid Saccharomycetaceae.

Authors:  Jean-Luc Souciet; Bernard Dujon; Claude Gaillardin; Mark Johnston; Philippe V Baret; Paul Cliften; David J Sherman; Jean Weissenbach; Eric Westhof; Patrick Wincker; Claire Jubin; Julie Poulain; Valérie Barbe; Béatrice Ségurens; François Artiguenave; Véronique Anthouard; Benoit Vacherie; Marie-Eve Val; Robert S Fulton; Patrick Minx; Richard Wilson; Pascal Durrens; Géraldine Jean; Christian Marck; Tiphaine Martin; Macha Nikolski; Thomas Rolland; Marie-Line Seret; Serge Casarégola; Laurence Despons; Cécile Fairhead; Gilles Fischer; Ingrid Lafontaine; Véronique Leh; Marc Lemaire; Jacky de Montigny; Cécile Neuvéglise; Agnès Thierry; Isabelle Blanc-Lenfle; Claudine Bleykasten; Julie Diffels; Emilie Fritsch; Lionel Frangeul; Adrien Goëffon; Nicolas Jauniaux; Rym Kachouri-Lafond; Célia Payen; Serge Potier; Lenka Pribylova; Christophe Ozanne; Guy-Franck Richard; Christine Sacerdot; Marie-Laure Straub; Emmanuel Talla
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement.

Authors:  Bruce J Walker; Thomas Abeel; Terrance Shea; Margaret Priest; Amr Abouelliel; Sharadha Sakthikumar; Christina A Cuomo; Qiandong Zeng; Jennifer Wortman; Sarah K Young; Ashlee M Earl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Fast and accurate de novo genome assembly from long uncorrected reads.

Authors:  Robert Vaser; Ivan Sović; Niranjan Nagarajan; Mile Šikić
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  Diversity of mating-type chromosome structures in the yeast Zygosaccharomyces rouxii caused by ectopic exchanges between MAT-like loci.

Authors:  Jun Watanabe; Kenji Uehara; Yoshinobu Mogi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  The revenge of Zygosaccharomyces yeasts in food biotechnology and applied microbiology.

Authors:  L Solieri
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 2.  Recent developments in the biology and biotechnological applications of halotolerant yeasts.

Authors:  Cecilia Andreu; Robert Zarnowski; Marcel Lí Del Olmo
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Population genomics of the pathogenic yeast Candida tropicalis identifies hybrid isolates in environmental samples.

Authors:  Caoimhe E O'Brien; João Oliveira-Pacheco; Eoin Ó Cinnéide; Max A B Haase; Chris Todd Hittinger; Thomas R Rogers; Oscar Zaragoza; Ursula Bond; Geraldine Butler
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 6.823

4.  Insights on life cycle and cell identity regulatory circuits for unlocking genetic improvement in Zygosaccharomyces and Kluyveromyces yeasts.

Authors:  Lisa Solieri; Stefano Cassanelli; Franziska Huff; Liliane Barroso; Paola Branduardi; Edward J Louis; John P Morrissey
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 2.796

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.