Literature DB >> 30533829

Draft Genome Sequences of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica Serotype Heidelberg from Chicken and Turkey Farm Environments.

Loïc Deblais1,2, Joy Scaria3, Gireesh Rajashekara1.   

Abstract

Thirty-one different Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serotype Heidelberg isolates collected from several chicken- and turkey-associated farm environments in the Midwestern United States were analyzed using whole-genome sequencing. Availability of these genome sequences may shed light on Salmonella adaptation to different farm environments.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30533829      PMCID: PMC6256628          DOI: 10.1128/MRA.01204-18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microbiol Resour Announc        ISSN: 2576-098X


ANNOUNCEMENT

Nontyphoidal Salmonella is one of the leading causes of human foodborne gastroenteritis in North America, with public health costs of approximately $695 million annually in the United States (1). According to the National Outbreak Reporting System (NORS) database (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), 38% of all salmonellosis outbreaks recorded in the United States between 2012 and 2016 were associated with poultry (https://wwwn.cdc.gov/norsdashboard/). Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serotype Heidelberg is the most common serotype isolated in all poultry breeder types and throughout all levels of the production chain in the United States and Canada (2–4). Rapid adaptation of Salmonella to the poultry host and the farm environment where the birds are raised reduces the antimicrobial efficacy of control methods implemented by the poultry industry (5). However, little is known about the impact of the farm environment on the genome content of Salmonella spp., which may facilitate adaptation to different environments. To this end, we sequenced the genomes of 31 Salmonella Heidelberg isolated from environmental samples obtained from chicken or turkey farms (6). Nineteen and 12 isolates were collected from environmental booties of 16 chicken and 8 turkey breeder farms, respectively, and 2 isolates were collected from hatchery debris in 2 different turkey farms (Table 1). For environmental bootie samples, fabric shoe covers premoistened with skim milk were used and walked on the floor inside the farm over a distance of 305 m. Samples were collected under the supervision of the Minnesota Board of Animal Health between April and July 2015 as part of the National Poultry Improvement Plan (NPIP) Salmonella monitoring program. Salmonella Heidelberg was isolated on a brilliant green agar with novobiocin, xylose lysine tergitol-4, and Millier-Mallinson medium. The identities of the 31 isolates were further confirmed by a PCR assay using one set of primers specific to the Salmonella genus (for OMPC, ATCGCTGACTTATGCAATCG [forward] and CGGGTTGCGTTATAGGTCTG [reverse]; amplicon length, 204 bp) and another set specific to the Salmonella. Heidelberg serotype (for GenBank accession number ACF69659, TGTTTGGAGCATCATCAGAA [forward] and GCTCAACATAAGGGAAGCAA [reverse]; amplicon length, 216 bp) and compared to a known Salmonella Heidelberg strain (7–9).
TABLE 1

Metadata of the 31 Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serotype Heidelberg isolates from chicken and turkey farm environments

IsolateSample originSample typeNCBI genome accession no.NCBI SRX accession no.No. of contigsContig N50a GC content (%)Total no. of sequencing reads
C_NS001ChickenEnvironmental bootiePGWO00000000SRX344154153412,08451.5948,617
C_NS002ChickenEnvironmental bootiePGWN00000000SRX344153951412,08451.51,025,661
C_NS003ChickenEnvironmental bootiePGWM00000000SRX344154052412,08451.8838,953
C_NS004ChickenEnvironmental bootiePGWL00000000SRX344152271412,08451.8622,170
C_NS005ChickenEnvironmental bootiePGWK00000000SRX344152193412,08451.7491,774
C_NS006ChickenEnvironmental bootiePGWJ00000000SRX344152852291,72552.3715,859
C_NS007ChickenEnvironmental bootiePGWI00000000SRX344152776144,34052.5906,054
C_NS008ChickenEnvironmental bootiePGWH00000000SRX344153049411,22352.21,038,062
C_NS009ChickenEnvironmental bootiePGWG00000000SRX344152965291,730521,006,172
C_NS010ChickenEnvironmental bootiePGWF00000000SRX344152474184,23652.2826,444
C_NS011ChickenEnvironmental bootiePGWE00000000SRX344152363276,22251.4796,049
C_NS020ChickenEnvironmental bootiePGWD00000000SRX344152671412,01852.9667,956
C_NS024ChickenEnvironmental bootiePGWC00000000SRX344152588203,72451.51,151,538
C_NS025ChickenEnvironmental bootiePGWB00000000SRX344154258411,82651.3887,634
C_NS026ChickenEnvironmental bootiePGWA00000000SRX344154353411,82052.2769,371
C_NS027ChickenEnvironmental bootiePGVZ00000000SRX344153151411,98552.2761,794
C_NS028ChickenEnvironmental bootiePGVY00000000SRX344153271235,52752.1937,797
C_NS029ChickenEnvironmental bootiePGVX00000000SRX344153395170,93052.1787,619
C_NS030ChickenEnvironmental bootiePGVW00000000SRX344153468291,72552.2646,325
T_NS-012TurkeyEnvironmental bootiePGVV00000000SRX344153570248,81052.2884,633
T_NS-013TurkeyEnvironmental bootiePGVU00000000SRX344153656424,42452.51,043,609
T_NS-014TurkeyEnvironmental bootiePGVT00000000SRX344153778231,39752.4883,270
T_NS-015TurkeyEnvironmental bootiePGVS00000000SRX344153888231,39752.4972,069
T_NS-016TurkeyHatchery debrisPGVR00000000SRX344151971291,72752.61,099,328
T_NS-017TurkeyEnvironmental bootiePGVQ00000000SRX344152072233,82051.71,128,127
T_NS-018TurkeyEnvironmental bootiePGVP00000000SRX344151560423,22452.1920,022
T_NS-019TurkeyHatchery debrisPGVO00000000SRX3441516102298,61751.9611,230
T_NS-031TurkeyEnvironmental bootiePGVL00000000SRX344151178240,11053775,776
T_NS-032TurkeyEnvironmental bootiePGVK00000000SRX3441512100175,042531,139,971
T_NS-033TurkeyEnvironmental bootiePGVJ00000000SRX344151394154,37352.91,511,607
T_NS-034TurkeyEnvironmental bootiePGVI00000000SRX344151415382,33952.61,356,089

Sequence length of the shortest contig at 50% of the total genome length.

Metadata of the 31 Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serotype Heidelberg isolates from chicken and turkey farm environments Sequence length of the shortest contig at 50% of the total genome length. Genomic DNA was extracted using an E.Z.N.A. bacterial DNA kit (Omega Bio-tek, Norcross, GA). Sequencing libraries were prepared using 1 ng of genomic DNA with a Nextera XT DNA sample prep kit (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA). PCR amplification was done in a Veriti 96-well thermal cycler machine (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) using Nextera XT Index 1 primers (N7XX) from the Nextera XT index kit (FC131‐1001). Illumina paired-end sequencing was performed on a MiSeq platform using 2 × 250 paired-end sequencing chemistry. The raw data files were demultiplexed and converted to FASTQ files using Casava v.1.8.2. (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA). Quality control of the raw reads was performed using FastQC (Babraham Bioinformatics, Cambridge, MA). The reads were trimmed and assembled with BBDuk (DOE Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA) and SPAdes (SPBU, St. Petersburg, Russia), respectively. The coverages of the assembled genomes were evaluated with BBMap (DOE Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA). The sizes of the genomes ranged between 4,766,150 and 5,104,082 bp, their coverage values ranged between 46.52× and 135.54×, and the numbers of contigs per assembly ranged between 62 and 174. Significant differences in the nucleotides and gene contents were detected between the isolates obtained from turkey environments and those obtained from chicken farm environments. Therefore, the availability of these genome sequences may facilitate understanding of Salmonella adaptation to different niches in poultry production (6).

Data availability.

Draft genomic sequences have been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA accession number SRP126070) and NCBI GenBank (BioProject number PRJNA417775) and are listed in Table 1.
  9 in total

1.  Detection of clusters of Salmonella in animals in Ontario from 1991 to 2001.

Authors:  Xi Zhang; Beverly McEwen; Elroy Mann; Wayne Martin
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.008

2.  Ranking the disease burden of 14 pathogens in food sources in the United States using attribution data from outbreak investigations and expert elicitation.

Authors:  Michael B Batz; Sandra Hoffmann; J Glenn Morris
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.077

3.  A temporal study of Salmonella serovars in animals in Alberta between 1990 and 2001.

Authors:  Michele T Guerin; S Wayne Martin; Gerarda A Darlington; Andrijana Rajic
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.310

4.  Development of multiplex PCR assay for simultaneous detection of Salmonella genus, Salmonella subspecies I, Salm. Enteritidis, Salm. Heidelberg and Salm. Typhimurium.

Authors:  S H Park; S C Ricke
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 3.772

5.  Genotypic relatedness and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella Heidelberg isolated from chickens and turkeys in the midwestern United States.

Authors:  Muhammad Nisar; Issmat I Kassem; Gireesh Rajashekara; Sagar M Goyal; Dale Lauer; Shauna Voss; Kakambi V Nagaraja
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.279

6.  Development of a multiplex PCR technique for detection and epidemiological typing of salmonella in human clinical samples.

Authors:  Juan Alvarez; Mertxe Sota; Ana Belén Vivanco; Ildefonso Perales; Ramón Cisterna; Aitor Rementeria; Javier Garaizar
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 7.  Salmonella pathogenicity and host adaptation in chicken-associated serovars.

Authors:  Steven L Foley; Timothy J Johnson; Steven C Ricke; Rajesh Nayak; Jessica Danzeisen
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 11.056

8.  A temporal study of Salmonella serovars from environmental samples from poultry breeder flocks in Ontario between 1998 and 2008.

Authors:  Theva Sivaramalingam; Scott A McEwen; David L Pearl; Davor Ojkic; Michele T Guerin
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.310

9.  Comparative Genomic Studies of Salmonella Heidelberg Isolated From Chicken- and Turkey-Associated Farm Environmental Samples.

Authors:  Loïc Deblais; Benjamin Lorentz; Joy Scaria; Kakambi V Nagaraja; Muhammad Nisar; Dale Lauer; Shauna Voss; Gireesh Rajashekara
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 5.640

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.