| Literature DB >> 28430086 |
Muhammad Nisar1,2,3, Issmat I Kassem1,2,3, Gireesh Rajashekara1,2,3, Sagar M Goyal1,2,3, Dale Lauer1,2,3, Shauna Voss1,2,3, Kakambi V Nagaraja1,2,3.
Abstract
Salmonella is one of the most common causes of foodborne illnesses in humans in the United States, and domestic poultry is considered an important source of this pathogen. Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Heidelberg is the fourth most commonly reported Salmonella from retail meats and food animals in the United States. We assessed the genotypes and antimicrobial resistance phenotypes of Salmonella Heidelberg isolated from various chicken and turkey hatcheries and breeder farms in the Midwest. The genotypes of 33 S. Heidelberg isolates from chickens ( n = 19) and turkeys ( n = 14) were compared using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis. Cluster analysis of the fingerprints showed that the majority of the chicken isolates grouped together with 87% similarity; those from turkeys clustered with 88% similarity. Similarity between chicken and turkey isolates was also high (86%). Isolates from turkeys were generally more genetically diverse than those from chickens. Antimicrobial susceptibility analysis detected resistance to sulfisoxazole (36% of the isolates), streptomycin (33%), gentamicin (27%), tetracycline (24%), ampicillin and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (15%), cefoxitin (12%), ceftriaxone and ceftiofur (12%), and chloramphenicol (9%). None of the isolates was resistant to azithromycin, ciprofloxacin, or nalidixic acid. Although the number of the isolates was limited in our study, we conclude that S. Heidelberg isolates from the same host generally clustered together and that a considerable number of the isolates were resistant to a number of antimicrobial agents.Entities:
Keywords: Antimicrobial resistance; Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Heidelberg; chickens; foodborne illness; pulsed-field gel electrophoresis; turkeys.
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28430086 DOI: 10.1177/1040638717690784
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Vet Diagn Invest ISSN: 1040-6387 Impact factor: 1.279