| Literature DB >> 30533013 |
Shuai-Lei Lian1,2, Xiao-Jun Sun1,2, Zong-Kui Zhou1,2, Cui-Ying Fan1,2, Geng-Feng Niu1,3, Qing-Qi Liu1,2.
Abstract
With the popularity of social networking sites (SNSs), the problems of SNS addiction have been increasing. Research has revealed the association between SNS addiction and irrational procrastination. However, the mechanism underlying this relation is still unclear. The present study aimed to examine the mediating role of social networking site fatigue and the moderating role of effortful control in this link among Chinese undergraduate students. The Social Networking Site Addiction Scale, Social Networking Service Fatigue Scale, Effortful Control Scale and Irrational Procrastination Scale were completed by 1,085 Chinese undergraduate students. Results indicated that SNS addiction, SNS fatigue and irrational procrastination were positively correlated with each other, and negatively correlated with effortful control. Further analyses revealed that, SNS addiction has a direct effect on irrational procrastination. SNS fatigue mediated the relationship between SNS addiction and irrational procrastination. Both direct and indirect effects of SNS addiction on irrational procrastination were moderated by effortful control. Specifically, this effect was stronger for people with lower effortful control. These findings help clarify the mechanism underlying the association between SNS addiction and irrational procrastination, which have potential implications for intervention.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30533013 PMCID: PMC6289504 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208162
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Conceptual model.
Descriptive statistics and interrelations among all of the observed variables and age.
| Variables | M | SD | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.SNS addiction | 2.67 | 0.76 | 1.00 | ||||
| 2. SNS fatigue | 3.51 | 1.16 | 0.45 | 1.00 | |||
| 3. Irrational procrastination | 3.33 | 0.57 | 0.33 | 0.32 | 1.00 | ||
| 4. Effortful control | 3.65 | 0.55 | -0.34 | -0.17 | -0.19 | 1 | |
| 5. Age | 19.66 | 1.16 | 0.02 | 0.02 | -0.02 | -0.03 | 1 |
Note. N = 1085.
**p< 0.01.
Regression results for the mediation model.
| Model | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1: Total effect model | |||||||||
| R | R2 | F | df1 | df2 | p | B | SE | t | p |
| 0.33 | 0.11 | 35.21 | 4 | 1080 | < 0.001 | ||||
| Constant | 3.56 | 0.40 | 9.01 | < 0.001 | |||||
| Gender | -0.03 | 0.03 | -0.84 | >0.05 | |||||
| Age | -0.05 | 0.02 | -2.27 | <0.05 | |||||
| Grade | 0.06 | 0.03 | 1.03 | <0.05 | |||||
| SNS addiction | 0.25 | 0.02 | 11.59 | < 0.001 | |||||
| Model 2: Mediator variable model | |||||||||
| R | R2 | F | df1 | df2 | p | B | SE | t | p |
| 0.45 | 0.20 | 56.64 | 4 | 1080 | < 0.001 | ||||
| Constant | 0.43 | 0.78 | 0.55 | >0.05 | |||||
| Gender | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.77 | >0.05 | |||||
| Age | 0.07 | 0.04 | 1.61 | >0.05 | |||||
| Grade | -0.10 | 0.06 | -1.60 | >0.05 | |||||
| SNS addiction | 0.68 | 0.05 | 14.54 | < 0.001 | |||||
| Model 3: Dependent variable model | |||||||||
| R | R2 | F | df1 | df2 | p | B | SE | T | p |
| 0.39 | 0.15 | 38.50 | 5 | 1079 | < 0.001 | ||||
| Constant | 3.51 | 0.39 | 8.97 | < 0.001 | |||||
| Gender | -0.03 | 0.03 | -1.03 | >0.05 | |||||
| Age | -0.06 | 0.02 | -2.65 | < 0.01 | |||||
| Grade | 0.07 | 0.03 | 2.44 | < 0.05 | |||||
| SNS addiction | 0.17 | 0.02 | 7.83 | < 0.001 | |||||
| SNS fatigue | 0.11 | 0.01 | 7.61 | < 0.001 | |||||
| Specific effect analysis | |||||||||
| B | SE | LLCI | ULCI | Ratio of direct effect or indirect effect to total effect | |||||
| Total effect | 0.25 | 0.02 | 0.20 | 0.29 | |||||
| Direct effect | 0.17 | 0.02 | 0.13 | 0.21 | 68% | ||||
| Indirect effect | 0.08 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.10 | 32% | ||||
Note. N = 1085. Unstandardized regression coefficients are reported. Bootstrap sample size = 5000. LL = low limit, CI = confidence interval, UL = upper limit.
*p< 0.05.
**p< 0.01.
***p< 0.001.
Regression results for the conditional indirect effects (moderated mediation).
| Model | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1: Mediator variable model | |||||||||
| R | R2 | F | df1 | df2 | p | B | SE | t | p |
| 0.46 | 0.21 | 41.02 | 6 | 1078 | < 0.001 | ||||
| Constant | -1.27 | 0.78 | -1.62 | >0.05 | |||||
| Gender | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.72 | >0.05 | |||||
| Age | 0.07 | 0.04 | 1.58 | >0.05 | |||||
| Grade | -0.10 | 0.06 | -1.57 | >0.05 | |||||
| SNS addiction | 0.66 | 0.05 | 13.54 | < 0.001 | |||||
| Effortful control | -0.04 | 0.06 | -0.61 | >0.05 | |||||
| SNS addiction × Effortful control | -0.26 | 0.07 | -3.56 | < 0.001 | |||||
| Model 2: Dependent variable model | |||||||||
| R | R2 | F | df1 | df2 | p | B | SE | t | p |
| 0.41 | 0.17 | 31.63 | 8 | 1076 | < 0.001 | ||||
| Constant | 4.37 | 0.39 | 11.21 | < 0.001 | |||||
| Gender | -0.04 | 0.03 | -1.18 | >0.05 | |||||
| Age | -0.06 | 0.02 | -2.70 | < 0.01 | |||||
| Grade | 0.07 | 0.03 | 2.39 | < 0.05 | |||||
| SNS addiction | 0.14 | 0.02 | 6.35 | < 0.001 | |||||
| SNS fatigue | 0.10 | 0.01 | 7.05 | < 0.001 | |||||
| Effortful control | -0.09 | 0.02 | -3.90 | < 0.001 | |||||
| SNS addiction × Effortful control | -0.07 | 0.03 | -2.48 | < 0.05 | |||||
| SNS fatigue × Effortful control | -0.08 | 0.02 | -3.79 | < 0.001 | |||||
| Conditional direct effect analysis at values of effortful control (M ± SD) | |||||||||
| B | SE | LLCI | ULCI | ||||||
| M– 1SD (3.09) | 0.18 | 0.03 | 0.12 | 0.23 | |||||
| M (3.65) | 0.14 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.18 | |||||
| M + 1SD (4.20) | 0.10 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.15 | |||||
| Conditional indirect effect analysis at values of effortful control (M ± SD) | |||||||||
| B | Boot SE | BootLLCI | BootULCI | ||||||
| M– 1SD (3.09) | 0.12 | 0.02 | 0.09 | 0.16 | |||||
| M (3.65) | 0.07 | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.09 | |||||
| M + 1SD (4.20) | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.05 | |||||
Note. N = 1085. Unstandardized regression coefficients are reported. Bootstrap sample size = 5000. LL = low limit, CI = confidence interval, UL = upper limit.
*p< 0.05.
**p< 0.01.
***p< 0.001.
Fig 2Effortful control moderates the relation between SNS addiction and SNS fatigue.
Fig 3Effortful control moderates the relation between SNS addiction and irrational procrastination.
Fig 4Effortful control moderates the relation between SNS fatigue and irrational procrastination.