| Literature DB >> 30531915 |
H Saeed1, A Hartland2, N J Lehto3, M Baalousha4, M Sikder4, D Sandwell1, M Mucalo5, D P Hamilton6.
Abstract
Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30531915 PMCID: PMC6288117 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-36103-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Conceptual figure summarising the biogeochemical cycling of iron (Fe) and phosphorus (P) in Lake Ngapouri, with DGT probes arrayed through the water column to detect changes in labile Fe and P concentration. In (a) oxidation of Fe2+ and co-precipitation of Fe3+ and P (and/or P adsorption on Fe hydroxide colloids) occurs during isothermal winter conditions, leading to Fe and P sedimentation and uniformly low dissolved Fe and P concentrations through the water column. In (b) the release of Fe colloids in the deep hypolimnion during summer stratified conditions is depicted (right and left arrows show products of reductive dissolution of Fe colloids and P desorption, respectively).
Figure 2Physicochemical characteristics of the water column of Lake Ngapouri between September 2015 and October 2016. (a) Temperature, (b) dissolved oxygen (DO), and (c) chlorophyll fluorescence data were extracted from CTD casts conducted before and after each DGT deployment. Data points are interpolated using the MATLAB contour function. Vertical lines in (a) (broken white) and (c) (solid red) show the time of sampling and Secchi depth respectively. The broken black line in (a) shows the timing of the onset (i) and end (iii) of stratified conditions in the lake as well as the approximate position of the thermocline (ii) to aid visual identification of these features.
Figure 3Atomic force microscopy (AFM) particle size distributions (PSD) from Lake Ngapouri samples collected between January and May 2016. First column are epilimnetic samples from (a) January, (c) March, (e) May and in the second column hypolimnetic samples from (b) January, (d) March, and (f) May 2016, respectively. Fraction (%) gives the percentage of total particles detected by AFM image analysis.
Figure 4Representative TEM results from Lake Ngapouri showing abundant nano-scale colloids containing iron and silicon. (a) The accompanying EDX spectrum from the globular colloid photomicrograph shown in (b).
Figure 5Time series of the depth-distribution of iron (Fe) at log10 scale in operationally-defined water fractions from Lake Ngapouri, (a) Dissolved Fe (μmol L−1), (b) Colloidal Fe (c) (μmol L−1), (c) CDGT Fe (μmol L−1) and (d) Fe (II) by Ferrozine method (μmol L−1). Broken black line in (a) shows the timing of the onset (i) and end (iii) of stratified conditions in the lake as well as the approximate position of the thermocline (ii).
Calculation of the diffusion coefficient (D) of the nanoparticles in the size range determined by AFM assuming spherical morphology.
| Month | Compartment | Temp.(K) | Average particle radius (nm) | 1σ | Đ | Average colloid | Solute |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D (×10−6 cm2 s−1) | D (×10−6 cm2 s−1) | ||||||
| January | Epilimnion | 295.15 | 0.61 | 3.47 | 2.86 | 4 | 5.63 |
| March | Epilimnion | 283.15 | 4.49 | 4.25 | 0.47 | 0.52 | 3.19 |
| May | Epilimnion | 294.15 | 6.45 | 5.43 | 0.41 | 0.37 | 5.47 |
| January | Hypolimnion | 283.15 | 4.8 | 4.93 | 0.51 | 0.49 | 3.19 |
| March | Hypolimnion | 287.15 | 2.25 | 1.53 | 0.34 | 1.05 | 4.45 |
| May | Hypolimnion | 283.15 | 1.58 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.47 | 3.19 |
1σ = 1 standard deviation (n = no. measurements); Đ = dispersity.
Comparison of the time taken by DGT to reach 95% steady state accumulation rate for Fe using representative diffusion coefficients for colloids or solutes (i.e. hydrated Fe2+ ions) in the epilimnion and hypolimnion of Lake Ngapouri.
| Epilimnion | Colloid | T95% (hrs) | Hypolimnion | T95% (hrs) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solute | Solute | Colloid | |||
| T95% (hrs) | particle radius (nm) | T95% (hrs) | particle radius (nm) | ||
| 18 | 0.61 | 26 | 21 | 0.61 | 30 |
| 32 | 4.49 | 198 | 37 | 4.49 | 227 |
| 19 | 6.45 | 278 | 22 | 6.45 | 319 |
| 32 | 4.8 | 211 | 37 | 4.8 | 242 |
| 23 | 2.25 | 98 | 27 | 2.25 | 112 |
| 32 | 1.58 | 70 | 37 | 1.58 | 80 |
T95% (hrs) = time taken by DGT to reach 95% steady state concentration.
Figure 6Time series of the depth-distribution of phosphorus (P) at log10 scale in operationally-defined water fractions from Lake Ngapouri, (a) Total P (μmol L−1), (b) 0.45 μm filtered fraction (dissolved P (μmol L−1)), (c) colloidal P(c) (μmol L−1) and (d) CDGT P (μmol L−1). Broken black line in (a) shows the timing of the onset (i) and end (iii) of stratified conditions in the lake as well as the approximate position of the thermocline (ii).
Figure 7Depth distributions of iron (Fe), phosphorus (P) and cross-plots of DGT-labile Fe vs P in the winter mixed period (a–c) and summer-spring stratified period (d–f).
Figure 8Depth distributions of (a) phosphorus and (b) iron fractions measured in Lake Ngapouri in March 2016. Panel (c) shows the corresponding CTD depth profiles for molecular oxygen, temperature and chlorophyll fluorescence.
Figure 9Water sampling and laboratory analysis workflow. Part (a) shows the range of in-field methods employed, (b) shows the water sample collection workflow including on-site filtration. Minimally-perturbed samples were collected in syringes and were capped for transport to the lab. Fe (II) was estimated on-site using Ferrozine analysis. Part (c) illustrates particle separation using stirred-cell ultrafiltration performed in a zero-grade N2 environment to avoid oxidative loss of Fe(II). Finally, part (d) shows the laboratory analysis procedure including the elution and subsequent analysis of DGT binding gels. *Denotes a water sample taken for off-line analysis.