Literature DB >> 30530129

Membrane stripping enables effective electrochemical ammonia recovery from urine while retaining microorganisms and micropollutants.

Marlies E R Christiaens1, Kai M Udert2, Jan B A Arends1, Steve Huysman3, Lynn Vanhaecke3, Ewan McAdam4, Korneel Rabaey5.   

Abstract

Ammonia recovery from urine avoids the need for nitrogen removal through nitrification/denitrification and re-synthesis of ammonia (NH3) via the Haber-Bosch process. Previously, we coupled an alkalifying electrochemical cell to a stripping column, and achieved competitive nitrogen removal and energy efficiencies using only electricity as input, compared to other technologies such as conventional column stripping with air. Direct liquid-liquid extraction with a hydrophobic gas membrane could be an alternative to increase nitrogen recovery from urine into the absorbent while minimizing energy requirements, as well as ensuring microbial and micropollutant retention. Here we compared a column with a membrane stripping reactor, each coupled to an electrochemical cell, fed with source-separated urine and operated at 20 A m-2. Both systems achieved similar nitrogen removal rates, 0.34 ± 0.21 and 0.35 ± 0.08 mol N L-1 d-1, and removal efficiencies, 45.1 ± 18.4 and 49.0 ± 9.3%, for the column and membrane reactor, respectively. The membrane reactor improved nitrogen recovery to 0.27 ± 0.09 mol N L-1 d-1 (38.7 ± 13.5%) while lowering the operational (electrochemical and pumping) energy to 6.5 kWhe kg N-1 recovered, compared to the column reactor, which reached 0.15 ± 0.06 mol N L-1 d-1 (17.2 ± 8.1%) at 13.8 kWhe kg N-1. Increased cell concentrations of an autofluorescent E. coli MG1655 + prpsM spiked in the urine influent were observed in the absorbent of the column stripping reactor after 24 h, but not for the membrane stripping reactor. None of six selected micropollutants spiked in the urine were found in the absorbent of both technologies. Overall, the membrane stripping reactor is preferred as it improved nitrogen recovery with less energy input and generated an E. coli- and micropollutant-free product for potential safe reuse. Nitrogen removal rate and efficiency can be further optimized by increasing the NH3 vapor pressure gradient and/or membrane surface area.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Membrane; Micropollutant; Nutrient recovery; Pathogen; Stripping; Urine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30530129     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.11.072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  4 in total

Review 1.  Recovery of Nutrients from Residual Streams Using Ion-Exchange Membranes: Current State, Bottlenecks, Fundamentals and Innovations.

Authors:  Natalia Pismenskaya; Kseniia Tsygurina; Victor Nikonenko
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-04

2.  Assessing the potential for up-cycling recovered resources from anaerobic digestion through microbial protein production.

Authors:  Kristof Verbeeck; Jo De Vrieze; Ilje Pikaar; Willy Verstraete; Korneel Rabaey
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 5.813

3.  Minimal Bipolar Membrane Cell Configuration for Scaling Up Ammonium Recovery.

Authors:  Mariana Rodrigues; Thiago T de Mattos; Tom Sleutels; Annemiek Ter Heijne; Hubertus V M Hamelers; Cees J N Buisman; Philipp Kuntke
Journal:  ACS Sustain Chem Eng       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 8.198

4.  Effects of Current on the Membrane and Boundary Layer Selectivity in Electrochemical Systems Designed for Nutrient Recovery.

Authors:  Mariana Rodrigues; Tom Sleutels; Philipp Kuntke; Cees J N Buisman; Hubertus V M Hamelers
Journal:  ACS Sustain Chem Eng       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 9.224

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.