Literature DB >> 30529281

Adverse events from large dose vitamin D supplementation taken for one year or longer.

Z Malihi1, Zhenqiang Wu1, Carlene M M Lawes1, Robert Scragg2.   

Abstract

In recent years, clinical trials increasingly have given large doses of vitamin D supplements to investigate possible health benefits beyond bone at high 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels. However, there are few publications on the safety of high-dose vitamin D given long term. The study objective was to investigate the cumulative relative risk (RR) of total adverse events, kidney stones, hypercalcemia and hypercalciuria from ≥2800 IU/d vitamin D2 or D3 supplementation, followed for one year or more in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A systematic review was conducted in Medline Ovid, EMBASE and Cochrane in March 2018 to update results of studies published since a previous review in October 2015. RCTs were included if they gave vitamin D2 or D3 at ≥2800 IU/d for at least one year and reported on total adverse events or at least one calcium-related adverse event. There were a total of 32 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Of these, only 15 studies (3150 participants) reported one or more event of the outcomes of interest. Long-term high-dose vitamin D supplementation did not increase total adverse events compared to placebo in 1731 participants from 10 studies (RR = 1.05; 95% CI = 0.88, 1.24; p = 0.61), nor kidney stones in 1336 participants from 5 studies (RR = 1.26; 95% CI = 0.35, 4.58; p = 0.72). However, there was a trend for vitamin D to increase risk of hypercalcemia in 2598 participants from 10 studies (RR = 1.93; 95% CI = 1.00, 3.73; p = 0.05); while its effect on hypercalciuria in only 276 participants from 3 studies was inconclusive (RR = 1.93; 95% CI = 0.83, 4.46; p = 0.12). In conclusion, one year or longer supplementation with a large daily, weekly or monthly dose of vitamin D2 /D3 did not significantly increase a risk of total adverse events or kidney stones, although there was a trend towards increased hypercalcemia, and possibly for hypercalciuria.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adverse events; Hypercalcemia; Hypercalciuria; Kidney stones; Meta-analysis; Vitamin D supplementation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30529281     DOI: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2018.12.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol        ISSN: 0960-0760            Impact factor:   4.292


  14 in total

1.  Effect of vitamin D supplementation on brain waves, behavioral performance, nitric oxide, malondialdehyde, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein in children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: study protocol for a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Abbas Ali Sangouni; Hamid Mirhosseini; Mahdieh Hosseinzadeh
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-10-22       Impact factor: 2.728

Review 2.  High-Dose Vitamin D-Mediated Hypercalcemia as a Potential Risk Factor in Central Nervous System Demyelinating Disease.

Authors:  Darius Häusler; Sebastian Torke; Martin S Weber
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 7.561

3.  A Critical Appraisal of Strategies to Optimize Vitamin D Status in Germany, a Population with a Western Diet.

Authors:  Roman Saternus; Thomas Vogt; Jörg Reichrath
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 4.  The Benefits of Vitamin D Supplementation for Athletes: Better Performance and Reduced Risk of COVID-19.

Authors:  William B Grant; Henry Lahore; Michelle S Rockwell
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 5.  Does the High Prevalence of Vitamin D Deficiency in African Americans Contribute to Health Disparities?

Authors:  Bruce N Ames; William B Grant; Walter C Willett
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 5.717

6.  A single-oral bolus of 100,000 IU of cholecalciferol at hospital admission did not improve outcomes in the COVID-19 disease: the COVID-VIT-D-a randomised multicentre international clinical trial.

Authors:  Jorge B Cannata-Andía; Augusto Díaz-Sottolano; Pehuén Fernández; Manuel Naves-Díaz; Walter Douthat; José L Fernández-Martín; Carmen Palomo-Antequera; Pablo Herrero-Puente; Ricardo Mouzo; Natalia Carrillo-López; Sara Panizo; Guillermo H Ibañez; Carlos A Cusumano; Carolina Ballarino; Vicente Sánchez-Polo; Jacqueline Pefaur-Penna; Irene Maderuelo-Riesco; Jesús Calviño-Varela; Mónica D Gómez; Carlos Gómez-Alonso; John Cunningham
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 8.775

7.  100 YEARS OF VITAMIN D: Supraphysiological doses of vitamin D changes brainwave activity patterns in rats.

Authors:  Gabriella Oliveira Lima; Alex Luiz Menezes da Silva; Julianne Elba Cunha Azevedo; Chirlene Pinheiro Nascimento; Luana Rodrigues Vieira; Akira Otake Hamoy; Luan Oliveira Ferreira; Verônica Regina Lobato Oliveira Bahia; Nilton Akio Muto; Dielly Catrina Favacho Lopes; Moisés Hamoy
Journal:  Endocr Connect       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 3.335

Review 8.  Vitamin D in the time of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic - a clinical review from a public health and public mental health perspective.

Authors:  Ursula Werneke; Fiona Gaughran; David M Taylor
Journal:  Ther Adv Psychopharmacol       Date:  2021-07-09

9.  A Phase II Multicenter Trial on High-Dose Vitamin D Supplementation for the Correction of Vitamin D Insufficiency in Patients with Breast Cancer Receiving Adjuvant Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Elodie Chartron; Nelly Firmin; Célia Touraine; Angélique Chapelle; Eric Legouffe; Lobna Rifai; Stéphane Pouderoux; Lise Roca; Véronique D'Hondt; William Jacot
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 5.717

10.  Vitamin D: Bolus Is Bogus-A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Richard B Mazess; Heike A Bischoff-Ferrari; Bess Dawson-Hughes
Journal:  JBMR Plus       Date:  2021-10-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.