| Literature DB >> 32161591 |
Darius Häusler1, Sebastian Torke1, Martin S Weber1,2.
Abstract
The exact cause of multiple sclerosis (MS) is unknown; however, it is considered to be an inflammatory disease of the central nervous system (CNS) triggered by a combination of both environmental and genetic factors. Vitamin D deficiency is also discussed as a possible disease-promoting factor in MS, as low vitamin D status is associated with increased formation of CNS lesions, elevated number of relapses and accelerated disease progression. However, it remains unclear whether this association is causal and related and most importantly, whether vitamin D supplementation in MS is of direct therapeutic benefit. Recently, we could show that in a murine model of MS, administration of a moderate vitamin D dose was of clinical benefit, while excessive vitamin D supplementation had a negative effect on disease severity. Of note, disease exacerbation was associated with high-dose vitamin D caused secondary hypercalcemia. Mechanistically dissecting this outcome, we found that hypercalcemia independent of vitamin D similarly triggered activation of disease-perpetuating T cells. These findings caution that vitamin D should be supplemented in a controlled and moderate manner in patients with MS and concomitantly highlight calcium as a novel potential MS risk factor by itself. In this review, we will summarize the current evidence from animal and clinical studies aiming to assess whether vitamin D may be of benefit in patients with MS. Furthermore, we will discuss any possible secondary effects of vitamin D with a particular focus on the role of calcium on immune cells and in the pathogenesis of CNS demyelinating disease.Entities:
Keywords: T cells; calcium; hypercalemia; multiple sclerosis; neuroimmunology; vitamin D
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32161591 PMCID: PMC7053380 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00301
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Overview of relevant vitamin D supplementation studies.
| Burton et al. ( | Escalation trial up to | 1,200 mg Calcium/day | Not measured | Trend toward reduced relapse rate |
| Camu et al. ( | 100,000 IU/2 weeks | Exclusion criterion: Hypercalcemia | Not measured | Primary endpoint was not met, however reduction in ARR, lesion formation/volume and lower EDSS progression |
| Fragoso et al. ( | 21 cases | Five patients with severe hypercalcemia | Not measured | Worsening of neurological condition, new relapses and MRI lesions, EDSS deterioration |
| Golan et al. ( | Low: 800 IU/day | Not observed | Increased IL-17 levels in the low dose group | No significant differences in relapse rate, EDSS, QoL, serum IL-10, and IFNγ |
| Hupperts et al. ( | 14,000 IU/day | Not observed | Not measured | Reduction of new MRI lesions |
| Jorde et al. ( | 20,000 IU/week | Exclusion criterion: serum calcium >2.55 mmol/l | N.A. | N.A. (type 2 diabetes mellitus) |
| Kampman et al. ( | 20,000 IU/week | 500 mg Calcium/day | Not measured | No effect on relapse rate, functional outcomes or fatigue |
| Lehouck et al. ( | 100,000 IU/4 weeks | Exclusion when history of hypercalcemia, small and transient risk of hypercalcemia | N.A. | N.A. (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) |
| Mahon et al. ( | 1,000 IU/day | Not measured | Increased serum TGF-h1 | Not mentioned |
| Marcus et al. ( | Single case | 2,020 mg Calcium/day | Not measured | Acute-onset tremors and confusion |
| McLaughlin et al. ( | Meta-analysis of 12 studies | Rare (1.5%) | N.A. | Significant increase in ARR and trends of increased EDSS and Gd+-lesions for the higher-dose arms |
| Rolf et al. ( | 4,000 IU/day | Not measured | No effect of 16-weeks vitamin D3 supplements except for a decreased TNF-α concentration in culture supernatant | Not measured |
| Smolders et al. ( | 20,000 IU/day | Not observed | Shift toward anti-inflammatory cytokine profile | Not measured |
| Soilu-Hanninen et al. ( | 20,000 IU/week | Exclusion criterion: serum calcium >2.6 mmol/l | Not measured | Reduced disability accumulation |
| Stein et al. ( | Low: 1,000 IU/once daily | Not observed | Not measured | Increased adjusted EDSS and more relapses in high vitamin D group |
| Zittermann et al. ( | 4,000 IU/day | Higher incidence of hypercalcemia (6.2 vs. 3.1% in placebo) | N.A. | N.A. (cardiovascular disease) |
IU, international unit; TGF, transforming growth factor; IL, interleukin; EDSS, expanded disability status scale; QoL, quality of life; IFN, interferon; MRI, magnet resonance imaging; NEDA, no evidence of disease activity; ARR, annual relapse rate; Gd, gadolinium; N.A., not applicable.
Figure 1T cell receptor signaling and calcium. After stimulation of the T cell receptor (TCR), the signal is relayed via immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motifs (ITAM) leading to the recruitment of zeta-activated protein 70 (ZAP70) and the phosphorylation of linker for activation of T cells (LAT). LAT recruits SH2-domain containing leucocyte protein of 76 kDa (SLP-76) which activates Interleukin-2 inducible tyrosine kinase (ITK). Subsequently, phospholipase C gamma 1 (PLC-γ1) creates diacylglycerol (DAG) and inositol triphosphate (IP3) by cleaving phosphatidylinositol triphosphate (PIP2). DAG activates protein kinase C (PKC), IP3 stimulates a calcium release from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) via the IP3 receptor (IP3R). This calcium release induces the interaction of stromal interaction molecule 1 (STIM1) with CRAC modulator 1 (CRACM1). In addition membrane-bound channels from the transient receptor potential (TRP) family, P2X receptors or voltage-gated calcium-channels (Cav) contribute to calcium mobilization. The resulting calcium elevation activates several signaling proteins such as calcineurin and its target nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFAT), nuclear factor κB (NFκB) or the Ca+2 calmodulin-dependent kinase (CaMK).
Figure 2Interference with calcium mobilization. Therapeutic intervention with calcium mobilization can target the initial release of calcium from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), for example by interfering with the ryanodine receptor (RyR). Alternatively, the interaction of stromal interaction molecule 1 (STIM1) with CRAC modulator 1 (CRACM1) can be disturbed by reactive oxygen species (ROS). Most available drugs target voltage-gated calcium channels (Cav).