Literature DB >> 3052928

Adulterants causing false negatives in illicit drug testing.

S L Mikkelsen1, K O Ash.   

Abstract

Illicit-drug users may attempt to falsify results by in vitro adulteration of specimens. We investigated eight additives (NaCl, Visine, handsoap, Drano, bleach, vinegar, golden-seal tea, and lemon juice) claimed by drug users to invalidate enzyme immunoassay (EIA) drug assays. We also analyzed adulterated urine specimens to determine if they could be identified, adding adulterants at several concentrations to 222 EIA-positive specimens confirmed by gas chromatography and mass spectrometry (GC/MS) to contain illicit drugs. To identify adulterated urines, we monitored pH, relative density, and urine color and turbidity at adulterant concentrations that falsified EIA results. Specimens contaminated with NaCl had relative densities greater than 1.035. Liquid Drano, bleach, and vinegar shifted urine pH outside the physiological range. Golden-seal tea caused a dark appearance, and specimens containing liquid soap were unusually cloudy. Lemon juice had no effect on the assays. Visine was the only adulterant not detected. The adulterants interfered somewhat differently with each of the drug assays. EIA assays for illicit drugs can be invalidated by specimen adulteration producing false-negative results. Therefore, if urine drug testing is to be conducted, pH, relative density, and appearance should be assessed and suspect specimens should be rejected. Not all adulterants can be detected, so observed collection is strongly recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3052928

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem        ISSN: 0009-9147            Impact factor:   8.327


  5 in total

1.  A case of psychosis after use of a detoxification kit and a review of techniques, risks, and regulations associated with the subversion of urine drug tests.

Authors:  Moneeshindra Singh Mittal; Rachna Kalia; Ahsan Y Khan
Journal:  Prim Care Companion CNS Disord       Date:  2011

Review 2.  The role of physicians as medical review officers in workplace drug testing programs. In pursuit of the last nanogram.

Authors:  H W Clark
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1990-05

Review 3.  Chemical dependency and drug testing in the workplace.

Authors:  J D Osterloh; C E Becker
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1990-05

4.  Immunoassays for drug screening in urine : Chances, challenges, and pitfalls.

Authors:  Harald Schütz; Alexandre Paine; Freidoon Erdmann; Günter Weiler; Marcel A Verhoff
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.007

5.  Effect of urine adulterants on commercial drug abuse screening test strip results.

Authors:  Ivana Rajšić; Dragana Javorac; Simona Tatović; Aleksandra Repić; Danijela Đukić-Ćosić; Snežana Đorđević; Vera Lukić; Zorica Bulat
Journal:  Arh Hig Rada Toksikol       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 1.948

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.