Literature DB >> 25868585

Immunoassays for drug screening in urine : Chances, challenges, and pitfalls.

Harald Schütz1, Alexandre Paine, Freidoon Erdmann, Günter Weiler, Marcel A Verhoff.   

Abstract

Immunoassays are presently used worldwide for the rapid screening of drugs. Despite the fact that they are a highly valuable tool for the testing of legal and illicit drugs, there is a real risk of false-positive and false-negative findings and many pitfalls must be taken into account when these tests are used in an uncritical manner and without valid confirmation procedures. In a long-standing successful cooperation with a large psychiatric hospital, we checked doubtful and nonplausible immunochemical findings in urine with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) confirmation methods. The reported case histories demonstrate typical pitfalls, for example, influence of changing nutritional habits, use of sweeteners (cyclamate), uncritical creatinine correction, impaired elimination, or cross-reactivities of simultaneous therapeutic medication. In accordance with national and international associations, immunoassays are recommended as a useful tool for screening. However, confirmation analysis with conclusive methods (GC-MS or liquid chromatography-MS) is unavoidable for valid substance identification, discrimination between active and inactive metabolites, detection of congeners, and accurate determination of concentrations in body fluids.

Entities:  

Year:  2006        PMID: 25868585     DOI: 10.1385/FSMP:2:2:75

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol        ISSN: 1547-769X            Impact factor:   2.007


  52 in total

1.  The measurement of nitrite in adulterated urine samples by high-performance ion chromatography.

Authors:  J Singh; J A Elberling; D G Hemphill; J Holmstrom
Journal:  J Anal Toxicol       Date:  1999 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.367

2.  False-positive LSD testing in urine samples from intensive care patients.

Authors:  J Röhrich; S Zörntlein; J Lotz; J Becker; T Kern; C Rittner
Journal:  J Anal Toxicol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.367

3.  Effects of pyridinium chlorochromate adulterant (urine luck) on testing for drugs of abuse and a method for quantitative detection of chromium (VI) in urine.

Authors:  B D Paul; K K Martin; J Maguilo; M L Smith
Journal:  J Anal Toxicol       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.367

4.  Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug interference in TDx assays for abused drugs.

Authors:  J Larsen; R Fogerson
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 8.327

5.  An investigation into the extent of possible dilution of specimens received for urinary drugs of abuse screening.

Authors:  S George; R A Braithwaite
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 6.526

6.  Nitrite adulteration of workplace urine drug-testing specimens. I. Sources and associated concentrations of nitrite in urine and distinction between natural sources and adulteration.

Authors:  F M Urry; G Komaromy-Hiller; B Staley; D K Crockett; M Kushnir; G Nelson; R E Struempler
Journal:  J Anal Toxicol       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.367

7.  Interference of common household chemicals in immunoassay methods for drugs of abuse.

Authors:  A Warner
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 8.327

8.  Mechanism and elimination of aspirin-induced interference in Emit II d.a.u. assays.

Authors:  M W Linder; R Valdes
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 8.327

9.  Investigation of interference by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in urine tests for abused drugs.

Authors:  D E Rollins; T A Jennison; G Jones
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 8.327

10.  Detectability of phencyclidine and 11-nor-delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol-9-carboxylic acid in adulterated urine by radioimmunoassay and fluorescence polarization immunoassay.

Authors:  W Bronner; P Nyman; D von Minden
Journal:  J Anal Toxicol       Date:  1990 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.367

View more
  2 in total

1.  Probe Heating Method for the Analysis of Solid Samples Using a Portable Mass Spectrometer.

Authors:  Shun Kumano; Masuyuki Sugiyama; Masuyoshi Yamada; Kazushige Nishimura; Hideki Hasegawa; Hidetoshi Morokuma; Hiroyuki Inoue; Yuichiro Hashimoto
Journal:  Mass Spectrom (Tokyo)       Date:  2015-04-25

2.  Determination of cyclamate in urine by derivatized gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Mohd Idris; Deepak Middha; Shaik N Rasool; Sudhir K Shukla; Tulsidas R Baggi
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2013-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.