BACKGROUND: Despite years of slow progress, muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is finally entering the era of molecularly guided targeted therapy. However, tumor heterogeneity is high in MIBC and may impact treatment response and resistance. The objective of this review is to dissect recent insights into inter- and intratumor heterogeneity (ITH) in MIBC, with emphasis on the clinical implications of this heterogeneity for biomarker-driven strategies and the development of new therapies. METHODS: A nonsystematic review was performed in PubMed and EMBASE using the terms "tumor heterogeneity" and "bladder cancer." RESULTS: Intertumor heterogeneity, as reflected by different clinical phenotypes in different patients, has been partially explained with next generation sequencing and other molecular profiling technologies. RNA-based molecular subtyping, for example, provides a classification of MIBC into distinct categories that can be used for further molecular analysis, biomarker discovery, risk stratification, and treatment selection. Molecular subtyping and specific genomic alterations, especially in DNA damage repair genes, may help explain why some patients respond better to systemic chemotherapy and immunotherapy. Conversely, spatial and temporal ITH threaten to confound attempts to target specific molecular lesions since not all tumor cells within a patient may carry the relevant lesion. Improved understanding and management of ITH is required for the most effective use of biomarker-driven targeted therapies. CONCLUSION: Strategies to assess and overcome intertumor and ITH in MIBC will be critical steps toward realizing the objectives of precision oncology. Novel techniques such as analysis of circulating tumor DNA and single cell sequencing are likely to revolutionize our understanding of tumor heterogeneity.
BACKGROUND: Despite years of slow progress, muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is finally entering the era of molecularly guided targeted therapy. However, tumor heterogeneity is high in MIBC and may impact treatment response and resistance. The objective of this review is to dissect recent insights into inter- and intratumor heterogeneity (ITH) in MIBC, with emphasis on the clinical implications of this heterogeneity for biomarker-driven strategies and the development of new therapies. METHODS: A nonsystematic review was performed in PubMed and EMBASE using the terms "tumor heterogeneity" and "bladder cancer." RESULTS: Intertumor heterogeneity, as reflected by different clinical phenotypes in different patients, has been partially explained with next generation sequencing and other molecular profiling technologies. RNA-based molecular subtyping, for example, provides a classification of MIBC into distinct categories that can be used for further molecular analysis, biomarker discovery, risk stratification, and treatment selection. Molecular subtyping and specific genomic alterations, especially in DNA damage repair genes, may help explain why some patients respond better to systemic chemotherapy and immunotherapy. Conversely, spatial and temporal ITH threaten to confound attempts to target specific molecular lesions since not all tumor cells within a patient may carry the relevant lesion. Improved understanding and management of ITH is required for the most effective use of biomarker-driven targeted therapies. CONCLUSION: Strategies to assess and overcome intertumor and ITH in MIBC will be critical steps toward realizing the objectives of precision oncology. Novel techniques such as analysis of circulating tumor DNA and single cell sequencing are likely to revolutionize our understanding of tumor heterogeneity.
Authors: Joshua J Meeks; Hikmat Al-Ahmadie; Bishoy M Faltas; John A Taylor; Thomas W Flaig; David J DeGraff; Emil Christensen; Benjamin L Woolbright; David J McConkey; Lars Dyrskjøt Journal: Nat Rev Urol Date: 2020-03-31 Impact factor: 14.432
Authors: Vincenzo Cuccurullo; Giuseppe Danilo Di Stasio; Francesco Manti; Pierpaolo Arcuri; Rocco Damiano; Giuseppe Lucio Cascini Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2021-05-11
Authors: Sruthi V Hindupur; Sebastian C Schmid; Jana Annika Koch; Ahmed Youssef; Eva-Maria Baur; Dongbiao Wang; Thomas Horn; Julia Slotta-Huspenina; Juergen E Gschwend; Per Sonne Holm; Roman Nawroth Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2020-02-07 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Anouk E Hentschel; Emma E van der Toom; André N Vis; Johannes C F Ket; Judith Bosschieter; Martijn W Heymans; R Jeroen A van Moorselaar; Renske D M Steenbergen; Jakko A Nieuwenhuijzen Journal: BJU Int Date: 2020-08-16 Impact factor: 5.588