Literature DB >> 30527132

Pros and cons of ultra-high-field MRI/MRS for human application.

Mark E Ladd1, Peter Bachert2, Martin Meyerspeer3, Ewald Moser4, Armin M Nagel5, David G Norris6, Sebastian Schmitter7, Oliver Speck8, Sina Straub9, Moritz Zaiss10.   

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopic techniques are widely used in humans both for clinical diagnostic applications and in basic research areas such as cognitive neuroimaging. In recent years, new human MR systems have become available operating at static magnetic fields of 7 T or higher (≥300 MHz proton frequency). Imaging human-sized objects at such high frequencies presents several challenges including non-uniform radiofrequency fields, enhanced susceptibility artifacts, and higher radiofrequency energy deposition in the tissue. On the other side of the scale are gains in signal-to-noise or contrast-to-noise ratio that allow finer structures to be visualized and smaller physiological effects to be detected. This review presents an overview of some of the latest methodological developments in human ultra-high field MRI/MRS as well as associated clinical and scientific applications. Emphasis is given to techniques that particularly benefit from the changing physical characteristics at high magnetic fields, including susceptibility-weighted imaging and phase-contrast techniques, imaging with X-nuclei, MR spectroscopy, CEST imaging, as well as functional MRI. In addition, more general methodological developments such as parallel transmission and motion correction will be discussed that are required to leverage the full potential of higher magnetic fields, and an overview of relevant physiological considerations of human high magnetic field exposure is provided.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  7 Tesla; Human; MRI; MRS; Ultra-high field

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30527132     DOI: 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2018.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc        ISSN: 0079-6565            Impact factor:   9.795


  64 in total

1.  X-ray-Based Techniques to Study the Nano-Bio Interface.

Authors:  Carlos Sanchez-Cano; Ramon A Alvarez-Puebla; John M Abendroth; Tobias Beck; Robert Blick; Yuan Cao; Frank Caruso; Indranath Chakraborty; Henry N Chapman; Chunying Chen; Bruce E Cohen; Andre L C Conceição; David P Cormode; Daxiang Cui; Kenneth A Dawson; Gerald Falkenberg; Chunhai Fan; Neus Feliu; Mingyuan Gao; Elisabetta Gargioni; Claus-C Glüer; Florian Grüner; Moustapha Hassan; Yong Hu; Yalan Huang; Samuel Huber; Nils Huse; Yanan Kang; Ali Khademhosseini; Thomas F Keller; Christian Körnig; Nicholas A Kotov; Dorota Koziej; Xing-Jie Liang; Beibei Liu; Sijin Liu; Yang Liu; Ziyao Liu; Luis M Liz-Marzán; Xiaowei Ma; Andres Machicote; Wolfgang Maison; Adrian P Mancuso; Saad Megahed; Bert Nickel; Ferdinand Otto; Cristina Palencia; Sakura Pascarelli; Arwen Pearson; Oula Peñate-Medina; Bing Qi; Joachim Rädler; Joseph J Richardson; Axel Rosenhahn; Kai Rothkamm; Michael Rübhausen; Milan K Sanyal; Raymond E Schaak; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Marius Schmidt; Oliver Schmutzler; Theo Schotten; Florian Schulz; A K Sood; Kathryn M Spiers; Theresa Staufer; Dominik M Stemer; Andreas Stierle; Xing Sun; Gohar Tsakanova; Paul S Weiss; Horst Weller; Fabian Westermeier; Ming Xu; Huijie Yan; Yuan Zeng; Ying Zhao; Yuliang Zhao; Dingcheng Zhu; Ying Zhu; Wolfgang J Parak
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 15.881

Review 2.  Clinical 7-T MRI for neuroradiology: strengths, weaknesses, and ongoing challenges.

Authors:  Brian J Burkett; Andrew J Fagan; Joel P Felmlee; David F Black; John I Lane; John D Port; Charlotte H Rydberg; Kirk M Welker
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  A 32-channel receive array coil for bilateral breast imaging and spectroscopy at 7T.

Authors:  Romina Del Bosque; Jiaming Cui; Stephen Ogier; Sergey Cheshkov; Ivan E Dimitrov; Craig Malloy; Steven M Wright; Mary McDougall
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-08-09       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Ultrasound neuromodulation: mechanisms and the potential of multimodal stimulation for neuronal function assessment.

Authors:  Hermes A S Kamimura; Allegra Conti; Nicola Toschi; Elisa E Konofagou
Journal:  Front Phys       Date:  2020-05-26

Review 5.  Molecular Sensing with Host Systems for Hyperpolarized 129Xe.

Authors:  Jabadurai Jayapaul; Leif Schröder
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-10-11       Impact factor: 4.411

6.  Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping: MRI at 7T versus 3T.

Authors:  Pascal Spincemaille; Julie Anderson; Gaohong Wu; Baolian Yang; Maggie Fung; Ke Li; Shaojun Li; Ilhami Kovanlikaya; Ajay Gupta; Douglas Kelley; Nissim Benhamo; Yi Wang
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 2.486

7.  Chemical shift-based prospective k-space anonymization.

Authors:  Hendrik Mattern; Martin Knoll; Falk Lüsebrink; Oliver Speck
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 8.  MRI biomarkers in neuro-oncology.

Authors:  Marion Smits
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2021-06-20       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 9.  Recent Advances in Neuroimaging of Epilepsy.

Authors:  Adam M Goodman; Jerzy P Szaflarski
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 10.  [Perspectives of X-nuclei magnetic resonance imaging in neuro-oncology].

Authors:  Sebastian Regnery; Tanja Platt
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 0.635

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.