| Literature DB >> 30526493 |
Yiyong Chen1,2, Noa Shenkar3,4, Ping Ni1,2, Yaping Lin1,5, Shiguo Li1,2, Aibin Zhan6,7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Adaptive evolution is one of the crucial mechanisms for organisms to survive and thrive in new environments. Recent studies suggest that adaptive evolution could rapidly occur in species to respond to novel environments or environmental challenges during range expansion. However, for environmental adaptation, many studies successfully detected phenotypic features associated with local environments, but did not provide ample genetic evidence on microevolutionary dynamics. It is therefore crucial to thoroughly investigate the genetic basis of rapid microevolution in response to environmental changes, in particular on what genes and associated variation are responsible for environmental challenges. Here, we genotyped genome-wide gene-associated microsatellites to detect genetic signatures of rapid microevolution of a marine tunicate invader, Ciona robusta, during recent range expansion to the harsh environment in the Red Sea.Entities:
Keywords: Adaptive genes; Biological invasion; Ciona robusta; Invasive species; Range expansion; Rapid microevolution; Red Sea
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30526493 PMCID: PMC6286502 DOI: 10.1186/s12862-018-1311-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
Sampling sites and genetic diversity indices based on genome-wide gene-associated microsatellites of Ciona robusta
| Site code | Region, Country, Ocean | Latitude | Longitude | AveT | MaxT | MinT | AveS | MaxS | MinS |
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RS | Eilat, Israel, the Red Sea | 29°33′11″N | 34°57′35″E | 24.97 | 28.67 | 22.04 | 40.34 | 41.35 | 39.72 | 22 | 2.524 | 0.349 | 0.427 | 0.186 |
| AM | Arenys de Mar, Spain, the Mediterranean | 41°33′41″N | 2°34′37″E | 17.98 | 25.28 | 13.29 | 37.67 | 38.21 | 36.87 | 48 | 2.853 | 0.307 | 0.416 | 0.264 |
| BL | Blanes, Spain, the Mediterranean | 41°41′12″N | 2°53′22″E | 17.44 | 24.38 | 12.98 | 37.95 | 38.32 | 37.48 | 22 | 2.624 | 0.307 | 0.442 | 0.311 |
| SA | Cape Town, South Africa, the Atlantic | 33°54′33″S | 18°25′59″E | 16.03 | 16.92 | 15.16 | 35.18 | 35.3 | 34.99 | 33 | 2.930 | 0.325 | 0.435 | 0.256 |
| NMF | Nelson, New Zealand, the Pacific | 41°15′29″S | 173°16′42″E | 13.55 | 16.37 | 11.22 | 34.78 | 34.92 | 34.62 | 17 | 3.937 | 0.399 | 0.562 | 0.296 |
| GAP | Gampo, Korea, the Pacific | 35°48′26″N | 129°30′13″E | 17.72 | 24.31 | 12.18 | 33.72 | 34.48 | 32.17 | 30 | 3.789 | 0.389 | 0.528 | 0.266 |
A total of six populations, including the population collected from the Red Sea in this study and other five populations from our previous study [44]. AveT, annual average water temperature; MaxT, the highest monthly average water temperature; MinT, the lowest monthly average water temperature; AveS, annual average water salinity; MaxS, the highest monthly average water salinity; MinS, the lowest monthly average water salinity; N, number of individuals; AR, mean allelic richness; HO, mean observed heterozygosity; HE, mean expected heterozygosity; FIS, mean inbreeding coefficient
Population genetic differentiation (pairwise FST) based on genome-wide gene-associated microsatellites of Ciona robusta
| Population | RS | AM | BL | SA | NMF | GAP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RS | **** | |||||
| AM |
| **** | ||||
| BL |
| 0.000 | **** | |||
| SA |
|
|
| **** | ||
| NMF |
|
|
|
| **** | |
| GAP |
|
|
|
|
| **** |
Bold numbers indicate statistical significance after sequential Bonferroni corrections
Fig. 1Bayesian inference population genetic structure of Ciona robusta in STRUCTURE. a K values from 2 to 5 based on the Red Sea population and other five populations; b K values from 2 to 3 based on four populations from the Red Sea, the Mediterranean sea and the Atlantic ocean, respectively. Each genotype is represented by a thin line, with proportional membership in different clusters indicated by different colors. Bold vertical lines separate collection sites, with sites ID as per Table 1
Fig. 2Microsatellite loci under selection. a, FST-based outliers detected by BAYESCAN, and the solid vertical line represents false discovery rate of 0.05; b, the number of microsatellite loci under selection identified by two approaches (ARLEQUIN and BAYESCAN), as well as the environmental association analysis (matSAM)
Gene annotation of 19 adaptive outlier loci against the Ciona robusta genome
| Loci | Location | Gene annotation (NCBI BLASTN) | Uniprot GO/AmiGo2 GO | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cin10 | Chromosome 1: | 0 | no hit | no |
| Cin19 | Chromosome 1: | 0 | uncharacterized LOC108949898 | no |
| Cin20 | Scaffold HT001144.1: | 0 | protein MB21D2 (MB21D2 gene) | protein-containing complex binding; cadherin binding |
| Cin36 | Scaffold HT000030.1: | 0 | no hit | no |
| Cin59 | Scaffold HT000127.1: | 1.00E-53 | uncharacterized LOC104266650 | no |
| Cin66 | Chromosome 3: | 0 | uncharacterized LOC104265511 | no |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Cin106 | Chromosome 6: | 0 | inositol polyphosphate 5-phosphatase OCRL-1 (OCRL gene) | GTPase activator activity; in utero embryonic development; |
| Cin138 | Chromosome 1: | 6.00E-88 | no hit | no |
| Cin153 | Scaffold HT000103.1: | 0 | IST1 homolog (IST1 gene) | protein binding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Cin182 | Chromosome 12: | 2.00E-94 | no hit | no |
| Cin189 | Chromosome 13: | 6.00E-144 | no hit | no |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Cin225 | Chromosome 10: | 0 | persulfide dioxygenase ETHE1 (ETHE1 gene) | glutathione metabolic process; hydrogen sulfide metabolic process; |
| Cin229 | Scaffold HT000276.1: | 0 | no hit | No |
Gene annotation was performed using BLASTN search in the NCBI website and gene ontology (GO) terms were against UniProt database and AmiGO 2 GO browser. Microsatellite loci in bold are located in genes putatively involved in temperature and salinity adaptation
Fig. 3Gene ontology (GO) term enrichment analysis. The GO annotation results were based on 44 genes annotated by 19 adaptive outlier loci and within 20 kb selective sweep windows. Gene ontology categories included molecular function, cellular component and biological process. GO categories for each function were sorted by decreasing order of evidence, based on the GO enrichment test P-value
Fig. 4Heat map of allele frequencies of 35 alleles obtained from 19 adaptive loci. Rows represent specific alleles, and columns represent different populations. Colours represent normalized allele frequencies
Fig. 5Pearson correlation tests between allele frequencies at adaptive loci and environmental factors. MinT, AveS, MaxS and MinS refer to the lowest monthly average water temperature, annual average water salinity, the highest monthly average salinity, the lowest monthly average salinity, respectively