| Literature DB >> 30525309 |
Ran-Ran Zhang1,2, Ke Cai1, Lian Liu1, Qian Yang1, Ping Zhang1, Yong-Hao Gui1, Feng Wang1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tbx2 plays a vital role in the cardiac cushion development. In this study, we aimed to determine the relationship between common genetic variants in the promoter region of TBX2 gene and the risk of congenital heart disease (CHD).Entities:
Keywords: zzm321990TBX2zzm321990; congenital heart disease; promoter; single-nucleotide polymorphism
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30525309 PMCID: PMC6393683 DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.530
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Genet Genomic Med ISSN: 2324-9269 Impact factor: 2.183
Association of SNPs in TBX2 promoter region with CHD risk in the case–control study
| SNPs | Genotype/Allele | Control | CHD | OR (95% CI) |
| HWE‐ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs1476781 (c.‐1123T>C) | CC | 303 | 245 | 1 | 0.39 | 0.76 |
| CT | 235 | 225 | 1.18 (0.92–1.52) | |||
| TT | 49 | 46 | 1.16 (0.75–1.80) | |||
| CT–TT | 284 | 271 | 1.18 (0.93–1.50) | 0.17 | ||
| C | 841 | 715 | 1 | |||
| T | 333 | 317 | 1.12 (0.93–1.35) | 0.23 | ||
|
| GG | 296 | 305 | 1 |
| 1 |
| GC | 242 | 170 |
| |||
| CC | 49 | 41 | 0.81 (0.52–1.27) | |||
| GC–CC | 291 | 211 |
|
| ||
| G | 834 | 780 | 1 | |||
| C | 340 | 252 |
|
| ||
| rs2286524 (c.‐646C>T) | CC | 291 | 268 | 1 | 0.72 | 0.92 |
| CT | 244 | 206 | 0.92 (0.71–1.18) | |||
| TT | 52 | 42 | 0.88 (0.57–1.36) | |||
| CT–TT | 296 | 248 | 0.91 (0.72–1.15) | 0.43 | ||
| C | 826 | 742 | 1 | |||
| T | 348 | 29 | 0.93 (0.77–1.12) | 0.43 |
CHD: congenital heart disease; CI: confidence interval; HWE: Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium; OR: odds ratio; SNPs: single‐nucleotide polymorphisms.
In bold, p < 0.05.
SNPs in DNA sequence of TBX2 promoter region (NG_052563.1).
Stratified analyses of rs4455026 by CHD classification
| CHD classification | No.(GG vs. GC–CC) |
| OR (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Septal defects | 192 versus 139 |
|
|
| ASD | 53 versus 27 |
|
|
| VSD | 104 versus 94 | 0.609 | 0.919(0.666–1.269) |
| ASD + VSD | 35 versus 18 |
|
|
| Conotruncal defects | 24 versus 15 | 0.179 | 0.636 (0.327–1.236) |
| LVOTO | 8 versus 11 | 0.475 | 1.399 (0.555–3.527) |
| RVOTO | 36 versus 14 |
|
|
| APVR | 9 versus 3 | 0.092 | 0.339 (0.091–1.265) |
| Complex CHD | 4 versus 4 | 0.981 | 1.017 (0.252–4.106) |
| Other cardiac abnormalities | 32 versus 25 | 0.410 | 0.795 (0.460–1.374) |
APVR: anomalous pulmonary venous return; CHD: congenital heart disease; CI: confidence interval; LVOTO: left ventricle outflow tract obstruction; OR: odds ratio; RVOTO: right ventricle outflow tract obstruction.
In bold, p < 0.05.
Figure 1Luciferase assays to analyze transcriptional activity. Promoter activity analysis using dual‐reporter luciferase system in three cell lines. The columns represented the promoter activity of different groups. (*p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001)
Figure 2Analysis of DNA binding affinity with two alleles by EMSA in HEK 293T (a) and H9c2 (b) nuclear proteins. The solid and dotted arrows highlighted specific nuclear proteins that might interact with Major/Minor‐probes. Black and wide arrow pointed to the free probes