Literature DB >> 30525309

A regulatory variant in TBX2 promoter is related to the decreased susceptibility of congenital heart disease in the Han Chinese population.

Ran-Ran Zhang1,2, Ke Cai1, Lian Liu1, Qian Yang1, Ping Zhang1, Yong-Hao Gui1, Feng Wang1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tbx2 plays a vital role in the cardiac cushion development. In this study, we aimed to determine the relationship between common genetic variants in the promoter region of TBX2 gene and the risk of congenital heart disease (CHD).
METHODS: Blood samples of 516 CHD patients and 587 control subjects were enrolled. Sanger sequencing and SNaPshot analysis were performed for genotyping in our case-control cohort. Luciferase and electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) were conducted to uncover the potential modulatory mechanism of the related variants.
RESULTS: Variant rs4455026(c.-1028G>C) in TBX2 promoter region was found to be associated with significantly lower CHD susceptibility. The risk of CHD in C allele carriers (GC and CC genotypes) decreased by 30% compared to the wild-type GG genotype subjects (OR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.55-0.89, p = 0.0038). It was revealed that G to C variation resulted in a decrease in the transcriptional activity of luciferase gene, and a potential change in binding affinity with certain nucleoproteins in EMSA data.
CONCLUSION: The minor C allele of rs4455026 in TBX2 promoter region was related with lower CHD susceptibility in the Han Chinese population via repressing its transcriptional activity.
© 2018 The Authors. Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990TBX2zzm321990; congenital heart disease; promoter; single-nucleotide polymorphism

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30525309      PMCID: PMC6393683          DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.530

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med        ISSN: 2324-9269            Impact factor:   2.183


INTRODUCTION

Congenital heart disease (CHD) is the most common structural birth defect in human beings, affecting nearly 0.8% of live newborns worldwide (Edwards & Gelb, 2016). The etiology of CHD was not completely understood. Both inherited factors and environmental changes have been reported to induce CHD, among which a growing number of coding‐region mutations of certain genes, transcription factors in particular, were identified in CHD patients (Barua & Junaid, 2015; Fahed, Gelb, Seidman, & Seidman, 2013; Nuhrenberg, Gilsbach, Preissl, Schnick, & Hein, 2014; Schiano et al., 2015; Zaidi & Brueckner, 2017). Consequently, alterations in conformation or dosage of these genes could disturb transcriptional regulatory programs during cardiogenesis and resulted in heart malformations (Dorn & Matkovich, 2015; Meganathan, Sotiriadou, Natarajan, Hescheler, & Sachinidis, 2015). Tbx2, a member of T‐box transcription factor family, is known to be essential for endocardial cushion formation. It is originally expressed in the cardiac crescent and then specifically restricted to the atrioventricular canal (AVC) and the outflow tract (OFT) region after the heart matured (Dupays, Kotecha, Angst, & Mohun, 2009; Harrelson et al., 2004). As a potential transcription repressor, Tbx2 also regulates the chamber‐specific gene expression, such as Cx40(Gja5), Cx43(Gja1), Nppa, and Chisel(Smpx) (Aanhaanen et al., 2011; Christoffels et al., 2004). Additionally, as a downstream target of Bmp2 signaling pathway, Tbx2 contributes to the epithelial–mesenchymal transition process and the heart valve formation together with Tgfβ2 (Shirai, Imanaka‐Yoshida, Schneider, Schwartz, & Morisaki, 2009). Spatiotemporal expression of Tbx2 is strictly modulated throughout cardiogenesis and proved to be dosage‐dependent. Tbx2‐null mice embryos exhibited OFT defects and small AVC, whereas Tbx2 transgenic mice generated relatively low cell proliferation in OFT and AVC regions (Harrelson et al., 2004). Also, mice fetus with aberrantly upregulated Tbx2 expression showed large linear heart tubes and failed to form chambers (Christoffels et al., 2004). Dose changes of certain genes due to variants in their regulatory regions have been reported to be associated with CHD risk in human studies (Li et al., 2014, 2015). Our previous findings also demonstrated that single‐nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in TBX5(601620) 3′UTR and TBX20(606061) promoter were related to increased and reduced CHD susceptibility by altering gene expression levels, respectively (Wang et al., 2017; Yu et al., 2016). Since few coding‐region mutations of TBX2(600747) were clarified in human samples, we speculated genetic factors in its regulatory region played a more significant role in pathogenesis of CHD. Both fragmental duplications and microdeletions containing TBX2 were found in syndromic CHD cases (Ballif et al., 2010; Radio et al., 2010). Four novel rare variants in TBX2 promoter region were identified in patients diagnosed with ventricular septal defects (Pang et al., 2013). However, it is unclear whether the common SNPs in TBX2 promoter contribute to CHD susceptibility. In the present study, we focused on the relationship between regulatory SNPs in TBX2 promoter region and CHD susceptibility in a cohort comprising 516 CHD cases and 587 healthy control subjects in the Han Chinese population, uncovered the significantly associated variant and revealed the potential contributory mechanism in functional experiments.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ethical compliance

The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the ethics committee of Children’s Hospital of Fudan University. Written consents were obtained from the guardians of the children before study commencement.

Study subjects

All subjects were genetically ethnic Han Chinese. The CHD patients (n = 516, 1.59 ± 0.21 years), diagnosed by echocardiography or cardiac operation, were recruited from Children’s Hospital of Fudan University (Shanghai, China) between August 2015 and August 2016. Among them, cases of bicuspid aortic valve, patent foramen ovale, isolated patent ductus arteriosus, small‐size septal defects, and vascular malformations were excluded from the present study. Patients with syndromic disorders, systemic diseases, or familial CHD were not recruited. All the controls (n = 482, 5.41 ± 0.28 years) were non‐CHD children hospitalized for traumas in the Department of Orthopedics, Children’s Hospital of Fudan University. We also included 105 CHS (China South) samples from the 1,000 Genomes Project (http://browser.1000genomes.org/index.html) as controls, and the association study was ultimately based on 516 cases and 587 controls. The CHD cases were classified into seven categories according to the commonly accepted criteria (Botto, Lin, Riehle‐Colarusso, Malik, & Correa, 2007). Specifically, 331 (64.1%) had septal defects, 39 (7.6%) had conotruncal defects, 19 (3.7%) had left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO), 50 (9.7%) had right ventricular outflow tract obstruction (RVOTO), 12 (2.3%) had anomalous pulmonary venous return (APVR), 8 (1.6%) had complex CHD, and 57 (11.0%) had other cardiac abnormalities.

SNPs identification and genotyping

Twenty‐four CHD subjects and the equal number of controls were selected randomly to screen the SNPs in the promoter region of TBX2 via sanger sequencing. The left 492 cases and 458 controls were genotyped by SNaPshot for SNPs with minor allele frequency (MAF) >5% and analyzed by Peak Scanner Software v1.0. DNA was extracted from peripheral venous blood samples using a genomic DNA extraction kit (QIAGEN, China) and quantified by using NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). A fragment in the promoter region, covering approximately 1 kb upstream of TBX2 (NG_052563.1) TSS (transcriptional start site), was amplified by PCR (Applied Biosystems 9700 PCR System, USA) and sequenced using Mutation Surveyor V4.0.8 (Applied Biosystems) in all samples. The PCR and sequencing primers are listed in Supporting Information Table S1.

Plasmid constructs, cell culture, and luciferase assays

To construct the reporter plasmids with TBX2 promoter, we amplified a 992‐bp fragment containing either major G or minor C allele from human genomic DNA, and subcloned them into KpnI and XhoI restriction sites upstream of luciferase gene in pGL3‐basic vector (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). The recombinant plasmids were marked as pGL3‐G or pGL3‐C and verified by DNA sequencing. Primers are listed in Supporting Information Table S1. Human embryonic kidney 293T (HEK 293T) cells, rat cardiac myocyte (H9c2) cells, and monkey kidney fibroblast‐like (COS‐7) cells were grown in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (Invitrogen, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum. HEK 293T (5.0 × 104/ml), H9c2 (1.0 × 104/ml), and COS‐7 (2.5 × 104/ml) were seeded in 24‐well culture plates 24 hr before cell transfections. Transfections with 800 ng of each TBX2 reporter plasmid (pGL3‐basic, pGL3‐G, and pGL3‐C) were conducted using Lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen) for each cell line. Luciferase assays were performed 24 hr later by using the Dual Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Probe design and electrophoretic mobility shift assay

To predict the effect of genetic variants in TBX2 promoter, two online bioinformatic algorithms were employed, including Alibaba (http://gene-regulation.com/pub/programs/alibaba2/index.html) and ALGGEN (https://alggen.lsi.upc.es/). Both tools demonstrated an alteration of nuclear protein binding at the locus of rs4455026. Thus, electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) probes labeled by FAM involving both of rs4455026 alleles were designed, namely, the Major‐probe with G allele and the Minor‐probe with C allele. Nuclear extracts were isolated from HEK 293T and H9c2 cells using a nucleoprotein extraction kit (Beyotime, China). Protein concentration was measured using Enspire Multilabel Reader (PerkinElmer, USA) and stored at −70°C. The nuclear proteins were incubated with the probes and ran on a 6% polyacrylamide gel using the Typhoon FLA 9500 IP Laser Scanning Imager (GE healthcare, USA) to get the results.

Statistical analyses

The distribution of SNPs in control group needed to be in line with the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE), that was, the allele (A/a) gene frequency (p, q): (p + q)2 = p 2 + 2pq + q 2 = 1. Therefore, HWE test in the controls and genotypic frequency disparity between the two groups was conducted using chi‐squared test. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by unconditional logistic regression analyses and applied to evaluate associations between genotypes and CHD risk. Haplotype analysis among different SNPs loci was performed using Haploview 4.2 and SHEsis online analysis (http://analysis.bio-x.cn/myAnalysis.php). Luciferase data were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Independent t test was used to compare luciferase activities between the two groups using SPSS 19.0 software (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). The two‐tailed p < 0.05 was defined as statistical significance.

RESULTS

TBX2 promoter variant rs4455026 significantly reduced CHD susceptibility in the Han Chinese population

In the present study, four variants were identified in the 1 kb of TBX2 promoter region. Three of them had MAF over 5% and thus were chosen for further SNaPshot genotyping, including rs1476781(c.‐1123T>C), rs4455026(c.‐1028G>C), and rs2286524(c.‐646C>T). In a total of 516 cases and 587 controls, variant rs4455026 was significantly correlated with reduced CHD susceptibility, with the C allele as the protective factor (p = 0.019; Table 1). Among the three SNPs in TBX2 promoter, rs4455026 and rs2286524 were in strong linkage disequilibrium (D′ = 99% and R 2 = 88%), constituting three haplotypes with frequency more than 5% (Supporting Information Figure S1). However, there was no obvious association between the haplotypes and risk of CHD (Supporting Information Table S2). Therefore, rs4455026 was selected for further function study.
Table 1

Association of SNPs in TBX2 promoter region with CHD risk in the case–control study

SNPsa Genotype/AlleleControlCHDOR (95% CI) p valueHWE‐p
rs1476781 (c.‐1123T>C)CC30324510.390.76
CT2352251.18 (0.92–1.52)
TT49461.16 (0.75–1.80)
CT–TT2842711.18 (0.93–1.50)0.17
C8417151
T3333171.12 (0.93–1.35)0.23
rs4455026 a (c.‐1028G>C)GG2963051 0.012 1
GC242170 0.68 (0.53–0.89)
CC49410.81 (0.52–1.27)
GC–CC291211 0.70 (0.55–0.89) 0.0038
G8347801
C340252 0.80 (0.66–0.96) 0.019
rs2286524 (c.‐646C>T)CC29126810.720.92
CT2442060.92 (0.71–1.18)
TT52420.88 (0.57–1.36)
CT–TT2962480.91 (0.72–1.15)0.43
C8267421
T348290.93 (0.77–1.12)0.43

CHD: congenital heart disease; CI: confidence interval; HWE: Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium; OR: odds ratio; SNPs: single‐nucleotide polymorphisms.

In bold, p < 0.05.

SNPs in DNA sequence of TBX2 promoter region (NG_052563.1).

Association of SNPs in TBX2 promoter region with CHD risk in the case–control study CHD: congenital heart disease; CI: confidence interval; HWE: Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium; OR: odds ratio; SNPs: single‐nucleotide polymorphisms. In bold, p < 0.05. SNPs in DNA sequence of TBX2 promoter region (NG_052563.1). To enhance the statistical power, we combined the rare homozygous CC with heterozygous GC genotype to compare with the wild‐type GG genotype in the dominant model of inheritance. According to the logistic regression analyses, GC and CC carriers had a significantly lower risk of CHD compared with the GG genotype subjects (OR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.55–0.89, p = 0.0038). A similar result was indicated from the allele analysis that subjects with the minor C allele exhibited less distribution proportion in CHD cases than in controls (OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.66–0.96, p = 0.019).

TBX2 c.‐1028G>C contributed to decreased risk of septal defects and outflow defects

To figure out the differential effect of variant rs4455026 on specific CHD types, we performed stratified analyses based on the previous CHD classifications. A statistical difference was observed in CHD subtypes of RVOTO (GC–CC vs. GG, OR = 0.396, 95% CI = 0.209–0.749, p = 0.003), as well as septal defects (GC–CC vs. GG, OR = 0.736, 95% CI = 0.561–0.966, p = 0.027; Table 2).
Table 2

Stratified analyses of rs4455026 by CHD classification

CHD classificationNo.(GG vs. GC–CC) p valueOR (95% CI)
Septal defects192 versus 139 0.027 0.736 (0.561–0.966)
ASD53 versus 27 0.008 0.518(0.317–0.847)
VSD104 versus 940.6090.919(0.666–1.269)
ASD + VSD35 versus 18 0.029 0.523(0.290–0.945)
Conotruncal defects24 versus 150.1790.636 (0.327–1.236)
LVOTO8 versus 110.4751.399 (0.555–3.527)
RVOTO36 versus 14 0.003 0.396 (0.209–0.749)
APVR9 versus 30.0920.339 (0.091–1.265)
Complex CHD4 versus 40.9811.017 (0.252–4.106)
Other cardiac abnormalities32 versus 250.4100.795 (0.460–1.374)

APVR: anomalous pulmonary venous return; CHD: congenital heart disease; CI: confidence interval; LVOTO: left ventricle outflow tract obstruction; OR: odds ratio; RVOTO: right ventricle outflow tract obstruction.

In bold, p < 0.05.

Stratified analyses of rs4455026 by CHD classification APVR: anomalous pulmonary venous return; CHD: congenital heart disease; CI: confidence interval; LVOTO: left ventricle outflow tract obstruction; OR: odds ratio; RVOTO: right ventricle outflow tract obstruction. In bold, p < 0.05.

Variant c.‐1028G>C decreased TBX2 promoter activity

Given the contribution of genetic variants in the promoter region to transcriptional activity, we constructed the recombined pGL3‐basic plasmids containing rs4455026 G (pGL3‐G) or C (pGL3‐C) allele to investigate promoter activity using luciferase assays. Compared to pGL3‐G transfection, transcriptional activity was decreased in pGL3‐C by 19.5%, 31%, and 15.1% for HEK 293T, H9c2, and COS‐7 cells, respectively (Figure 1). In combination with reduced CHD risk for the minor C allele, its repressed luciferase activity indicated that less expression level of TBX2 might prevent CHD pathogenesis to some extent.
Figure 1

Luciferase assays to analyze transcriptional activity. Promoter activity analysis using dual‐reporter luciferase system in three cell lines. The columns represented the promoter activity of different groups. (*p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001)

Luciferase assays to analyze transcriptional activity. Promoter activity analysis using dual‐reporter luciferase system in three cell lines. The columns represented the promoter activity of different groups. (*p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001)

Minor C allele of rs4455026 repressed binding affinity of specific nuclear proteins

To further explore the mechanism of rs4455026 in interfering TBX2 promoter activity, we predicted transcription factors changes in binding to this locus due to different alleles. It was suggested in Alibaba and ALGGEN that transcription enhancers Krox‐20 and Sp1 could bind with rs4455026 G allele, while G to C alteration diminished both factors’ binding affinity and instead, increased the binding affinity of a transcription inhibitor named "represso" (Supporting Information Figure S2). To verify our hypothesis, we designed FAM‐labeled probes Major (G allele) and Minor (C allele) to perform EMSA experiment using HEK‐293T and H9c2 cell extracts. Three bands were obtained in HEK 293T nuclear extracts. Among them, the band with solid arrows showed stronger binding of the Minor‐probe than the Major, whereas the band with dotted arrow presented weaker binding with the Minor‐probe (Figure 2a). In line with the findings in HEK 293T, competition assays in H9c2 also indicated lower binding affinity of nuclear transcription factors to the minor allele (Figure 2b), and the bindings of the labeled probes to the extracts were inhibited by higher concentration of unlabeled probes in both cell lines. According to the EMSA result, we presumed that transcription stimulators might overweigh the repressors in nuclear proteins to bind the Minor‐C probe, thus resulting in lower TBX2 promoter activity for C allele carriers in CHD cases.
Figure 2

Analysis of DNA binding affinity with two alleles by EMSA in HEK 293T (a) and H9c2 (b) nuclear proteins. The solid and dotted arrows highlighted specific nuclear proteins that might interact with Major/Minor‐probes. Black and wide arrow pointed to the free probes

Analysis of DNA binding affinity with two alleles by EMSA in HEK 293T (a) and H9c2 (b) nuclear proteins. The solid and dotted arrows highlighted specific nuclear proteins that might interact with Major/Minor‐probes. Black and wide arrow pointed to the free probes

DISCUSSION

As one of the key genes participating in the formation of endocardial cushions, few coding‐region mutations of TBX2 have been reported in sporadic CHD. In contrast, four novel rare mutations in TBX2 promoter region were indicated to cause ventricular septal defects, indicating the contribution of TBX2 regulatory variants to the occurrence of CHD (Pang et al., 2013). In accordance with the previous studies, both duplications and microdeletions of the chromosome fragments containing TBX2 (located at chromosome 17q23) could result in syndromic disorders including heart defects (Ballif et al., 2010; Radio et al., 2010). Taken together with the aberrant cardiogenesis in mice models, the function of Tbx2 is dosage sensitive throughout the cardiac embryogenesis (Aanhaanen et al., 2011; Harrelson et al., 2004). Therefore, we speculated that common regulatory variants of TBX2 might play a role in CHD risk in the condition of altering TBX2 expression levels. In our cohort composed of 516 CHD children and 587 control subjects in the Han Chinese population, association studies were conducted to investigate the association between common SNPs in TBX2 promoter and the susceptibility of CHD. A significantly lower CHD risk was revealed for rs4455026 C carriers than wild‐type GG subjects (OR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.55–0.89, p = 0.0038), notably in RVOTO (OR = 0.396, 95% CI = 0.209–0.749, p = 0.003) and septal defects (OR = 0.736, 95% CI = 0.561–0.966, p = 0.027). This result was consistent with the expression pattern of Tbx2, mostly restricted in the AVC and OFT region, which was indispensable for cardiac cyclization and the right ventricle formation (Aanhaanen et al., 2009). Variants in promoter region were reported to influence genes’ transcriptional activity (Yu et al., 2016). In our study, functional analyses using luciferase assays and EMSA indicated the rs4455026 C allele might decrease TBX2 promoter activity by altering the binding affinity of certain transcription factors. According to the online bioinformatic tools, Krox‐20 and Sp1 were predicted as potential stimulators with lower binding affinity with C allele, whereas another inhibitory factor called “represso” had higher binding affinity (Desmazieres, Charnay, & Gilardi‐Hebenstreit, 2009; Martin‐Gallausiaux et al., 2018). We inferred that the stimulators had more significant influence than the inhibitor, and as a result, G to C alteration gave rise to a lower TBX2 promoter activity and less gene expression. Experimental evidence based on animal models has confirmed that Tbx2 modulates the endocardial cushion development in a dose‐dependent manner, for both deletion and upregulation of Tbx2 interfere AVC formation (Chi et al., 2008; Singh et al., 2009). In particular, Tbx2 transgenic mice failed to form chambers and generated low cell proliferation in OFT and AVC regions (Harrelson et al., 2004). In our study, rs4455026 C allele showed a protective effect to decrease CHD risk via reducing gene’s transcriptional activity, which implied overexpression of TBX2 could also disturb heart development. A patient with two copies of TBX2, caused by the chromosome 17q23.2 duplication, was reported to suffer from complex congenital heart defects (Liu et al., 2018). The underlying mechanism might be that loss of repressive modulation of Tbx2 on Nkx2.5, which further targets the chamber‐specific genes involving Nppa and Cx43, results in abnormal formation of cardiac chambers and septation (Christoffels et al., 2004). As a transcription repressor, Tbx2 can also decrease the proliferation of non‐chamber myocardium by inhibiting N‐myc1 and avoids the deposition of cardiac glia in the ventricles by decreasing the expressions of Has2 and Tgfβ2, which are important for normal shaping of heart structures (Shirai et al., 2009). Besides, Tbx2 acts to inhibit Tbx5‐induced chamber differentiation and endocardial cushion formation, making these regions to develop another fate (Habets et al., 2002). These data contribute to interpret the reason why lower TBX2 expression decreased the susceptibility of CHD in the present study. Several limitations were observed in our study. First, since patient amounts of several CHD subtypes were relatively scarce, such as LVOTO and APVR, more samples are needed to optimize the statistical power for stratified analyses. Furthermore, the lack of heart tissues and specific antibodies also limited the mechanism studies concerning rs4455026 modulation on TBX2 promoter activity. Future investigations are deserved to clarify the specific regulatory nuclear proteins and to provide a new clue to reveal the etiology of CHD. To conclude, the minor C allele of rs4455026 in TBX2 promoter region was associated with reduced CHD susceptibility in the Han Chinese population, especially for the CHD subtypes of RVOTO and septal defects. Functional analyses in three cell lines demonstrated that G to C variation resulted in decreased transcriptional activity and lower binding ability with some nuclear proteins. Our study illustrated a potential role of SNPs in the regulatory region of TBX2 in affecting its transcriptional activity and revealed a possible mechanism for the pathogenesis of sporadic CHD.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

None declared. Click here for additional data file.
  28 in total

1.  T-box transcription factor Tbx2 represses differentiation and formation of the cardiac chambers.

Authors:  Vincent M Christoffels; Willem M H Hoogaars; Alessandra Tessari; Danielle E W Clout; Antoon F M Moorman; Marina Campione
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.780

2.  Seeking causes: Classifying and evaluating congenital heart defects in etiologic studies.

Authors:  Lorenzo D Botto; Angela E Lin; Tiffany Riehle-Colarusso; Sadia Malik; Adolfo Correa
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2007-10

Review 3.  Epitranscriptional regulation of cardiovascular development and disease.

Authors:  Gerald W Dorn; Scot J Matkovich
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 4.  Lifestyle, pregnancy and epigenetic effects.

Authors:  Subit Barua; Mohammed A Junaid
Journal:  Epigenomics       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 4.778

Review 5.  Epigenetic-related therapeutic challenges in cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Concetta Schiano; Maria Teresa Vietri; Vincenzo Grimaldi; Antonietta Picascia; Maria Rosaria De Pascale; Claudio Napoli
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 14.819

6.  Tbx20 interacts with smads to confine tbx2 expression to the atrioventricular canal.

Authors:  Reena Singh; Thomas Horsthuis; Henner F Farin; Thomas Grieskamp; Julia Norden; Marianne Petry; Vincent Wakker; Antoon F M Moorman; Vincent M Christoffels; Andreas Kispert
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 17.367

7.  Cooperative action of Tbx2 and Nkx2.5 inhibits ANF expression in the atrioventricular canal: implications for cardiac chamber formation.

Authors:  Petra E M H Habets; Antoon F M Moorman; Danielle E W Clout; Marian A van Roon; Merel Lingbeek; Maarten van Lohuizen; Marina Campione; Vincent M Christoffels
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2002-05-15       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 8.  Genetics and Genomics of Congenital Heart Disease.

Authors:  Samir Zaidi; Martina Brueckner
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 17.367

9.  TBX2 gene duplication associated with complex heart defect and skeletal malformations.

Authors:  Francesca Clementina Radio; Laura Bernardini; Sara Loddo; Irene Bottillo; Antonio Novelli; Rita Mingarelli; Bruno Dallapiccola
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.802

10.  Novel and functional sequence variants within the TBX2 gene promoter in ventricular septal defects.

Authors:  Shuchao Pang; Yumei Liu; Zhongqing Zhao; Wenhui Huang; Dongfeng Chen; Bo Yan
Journal:  Biochimie       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 4.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.