| Literature DB >> 30525072 |
Naoki Takatori1, Masato Sato1, Eriko Toyoda1, Takumi Takahashi1, Eri Okada1, Miki Maehara1, Masahiko Watanabe1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Using a rat model of nontraumatic early arthritis induced by intra-articular administration of low-dose monoiodoacetic acid (MIA), we transplanted allogeneic chondrocyte sheets and examined the effects on tissue repair.Entities:
Keywords: AB, Antibiotic-antimycotic solution; Acan, Aggrecan; Chondrocyte sheet; Col1A1, Collagen type Ⅰalpha 1; Col2A1, Collagen type Ⅱalpha 1; Comp, Cartilage oligomeric matrix protein; DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium; DPBS, Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline; EDTA, Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid; FBS, Fetal bovine serum; IFP, Infrapatellar fat pad; ITGa10, Integrin alpha-10; MIA, Monoiodoacetic acid; Mmp13, Matrix metalloproteinase-13; Monoiodoacetic acid (MIA); OA, Osteoarthritis; OARSI score; OARSI, Osteoarthritis research society international; Osteoarthritis; PVDF, Polyvinylidene difluoride; Transplantation; qPCR, Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction
Year: 2018 PMID: 30525072 PMCID: PMC6222284 DOI: 10.1016/j.reth.2018.07.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Regen Ther ISSN: 2352-3204 Impact factor: 3.419
Fig. 1Experimental schedule. Four weeks after administration of MIA, Group A was sacrificed, and Groups B and C were subjected to cell sheet transplantation surgery. At 8 weeks after MIA administration, Group B and C were sacrificed.
OARSI osteoarthritis cartilage histopathology scoring.
| Grade (key feature) | Stage % Involvement (surface, area, volume) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stage 1 (<10%) | Stage 2 (10–25%) | Stage 3 (25–50%) | Stage 4 (>50%) | |
| Grade 1 (surface intact) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| Grade 2 (surface discontinuity) | 2 | 4 | 6 | 8 |
| Grade 3 (vertical fissures, clefts) | 3 | 6 | 9 | 12 |
| Grade 4 (erosion) | 4 | 8 | 12 | 16 |
| Grade 5 (denudation) | 5 | 10 | 15 | 20 |
| Grade 6 (deformation) | 6 | 12 | 18 | 24 |
| Score = grade × stage | ||||
Fig. 2Macroscopic and histological findings, and gene expression in cell sheets. (A) Representative images of a cell sheet attached to a white polyvinylidene membrane. (B) Hematoxylin–eosin, Safranin O, toluidine blue, and collagen type II staining of the cartilage matrix. Collagen type I did not stain (×40, scale bar = 50 μm). (C) The expression of Col1A1 and ITGa10 increased, but there was no significant difference (p > 0.05). Expression of Sox9 and Mmp13 increased significantly but not more than 2-fold (*p < 0.05, <2-fold). Expression of Col2A1, Acan, Lect1, and Comp increased significantly by >2-fold (*p < 0.05, >2-fold).
Fig. 3Time course after administration of MIA, limb weight distribution ratio on the last day of each group, and macroscopic findings for femoral condylar articular cartilage. (A) The limb weight distribution ratio decreased transiently after administration of MIA and after transplantation surgery. At 28 days after MIA administration, the ratios did not differ significantly (p > 0.05) between any group: 47.4% ± 1.0% in Group A, 47.7% ± 0.3% in Group B, and 47.6% ± 0.6% in Group C. (B) On the last day, the limb weight distribution ratio was significantly higher in Group B than in the other two groups: 47.4% ± 1.0% in Group A, 49.4% ± 0.2% in Group B, and 48.4% ± 0.6% in Group C (**p < 0.01 for Group A vs B; *p < 0.05 for Group B vs C; p > 0.05 for Group A vs C). (C) The upper panel shows unstained samples, and the lower panel shows samples stained with indigo carmine. Compared with undamaged tissue, Group A showed damage to the medial condyle, and Group B showed less damage. More damage was observed in the lateral condylar region in Group C.
Fig. 4Histological findings in the femur and tibia, and OARSI scores. (A) Undamaged femoral condylar Safranin O staining was observed in Group A with loss of chondrocytes and proteoglycans. Group B showed a cartilage layer and some Safranin O staining. Group C showed erosion and thinning of the cartilage layer. No peeling of the transplanted cartilage sheet or uninitiated parts were observed in Group B. Safranin O staining of the normal tibia and loss of chondrocytes and proteoglycans were observed in Group A, as seen in the femur. Compared with the femur in Group B, although the cartilage layer remained, slight erosion was observed and this tissue did not stain with Safranin O in Group A. In Group C, erosion and thinning of the cartilage layer were observed (×20, scale bar = 50 μm). Immunostaining of the femur showed collagen type II staining in all intact cartilage, but collagen type I staining was observed only in the superficial regions of cartilage in normal, Group A, and Group B. Immunostaining of the tibia showed both collagen type I and collagen type II staining (×20, scale bar = 50 μm). (B) The OARSI score for the femur differed significantly between Groups B and C but not between Groups A and B, or Groups A and C (*p < 0.05, Group B vs C; p > 0.05, Group A vs B, and Group A vs C). The OARSI score for the tibia did not differ significantly between the three groups.