| Literature DB >> 30524822 |
Olatunde Sunday Eludoyin1, Onisoya Margaret Ogbe1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Consumption of plants such as Carica papaya grown around automobile workshops is common in big cities in Nigeria. However, little is known about the heavy metals contamination of these consumables due to the influence of automobile emissions during maintenance activities.Entities:
Keywords: auto mechanic; bio-accumulation; heavy metals; human health; soil pollution
Year: 2017 PMID: 30524822 PMCID: PMC6259479 DOI: 10.5696/2156-9614-7.14.48
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Health Pollut ISSN: 2156-9614
pH, EC and Heavy Metals in Carica papaya
| Root | 5.00 | 6.10 | 5.67±0.43 | 7.80 | 8.30 | 8.09±0.18 | 22.756 (0.005)* | - | |
| Leaf | 5.10 | 6.00 | 5.56±0.40 | 7.90 | 8.70 | 8.16±0.26 | |||
| Fruit | 5.00 | 6.20 | 5.67±0.46 | 7.80 | 8.40 | 8.19±0.25 | |||
| Stem | 5.20 | 6.30 | 5.81±0.44 | 7.80 | 8.60 | 8.17±0.25 | |||
| Root | 868.0 | 2120.0 | 1386.1±389.0 | 43.0 | 570.0 | 357.7±106.7 | 11.932 (0.001)* | - | |
| Leaf | 724.0 | 2123.0 | 1580.2±466.2 | 310.0 | 504.0 | 419.4±64.4 | |||
| Fruit | 893.0 | 2111.0 | 1451.4±428.8 | 275.0 | 610.0 | 439.7±109.7 | |||
| Stem | 853.0 | 2146.0 | 1401.1±433.5 | 280.0 | 506.0 | 390.3±71.5 | |||
| Root | 37.50 | 75.10 | 51.4±14.1 | 10.80 | 26.00 | 18.5±5.3 | 10.243 (0.001)* | 0.3** | |
| Leaf | 21.30 | 80.30 | 43.4±19.3 | 8.20 | 28.50 | 17.6±7.1 | |||
| Fruit | 18.40 | 65.20 | 41.8±16.6 | 7.30 | 20.40 | 14.8±5.8 | |||
| Stem | 25.30 | 70.50 | 43.2±15.4 | 8.60 | 19.60 | 14.9±4.4 | |||
| Root | 3.9 | 36.7 | 26.7±11.4 | 6.5 | 19.5 | 12.6±5.1 | 11.760 (0.001)* | 0.05–0.5**** | |
| Leaf | 28.3 | 34.8 | 32.0±2.3 | 6.7 | 17.2 | 11.2±3.6 | |||
| Fruit | 19.2 | 38.6 | 30.2±5.9 | 5.1 | 13.7 | 9.7±2.9 | |||
| Stem | 18.6 | 41.0 | 30.2±6.7 | 6.5 | 15.1 | 9.7±3.1 | |||
| Root | 2.3 | 16.5 | 11.1±4.9 | 1.5 | 6.3 | 3.4±0.6 | 12.332 (0.001)* | 0.2** | |
| Leaf | 9.0 | 17.1 | 12.7±2.5 | 1.3 | 4.8 | 2.8±0.4 | |||
| Fruit | 5.5 | 15.0 | 11.9±3.6 | 9.0 | 4.0 | 2.8±0.3 | |||
| Stem | 8.0 | 18.0 | 13.6±3.1 | 1.0 | 3.2 | 2.0±0.2 | |||
| Root | 18.7 | 73.2 | 37.1±2.1 | 1.6 | 6.5 | 2.1±1.6 | 8.329 (0.001)* | 73*** | |
| Leaf | 19.0 | 70.4 | 38.3±2.2 | 2.0 | 5.1 | 3.5±1.4 | |||
| Fruit | 17.5 | 79.1 | 40.8±2.3 | 1.8 | 5.5 | 3.0±1.3 | |||
| Stem | 15.6 | 88.0 | 39.2±2.8 | 1.5 | 4.9 | 2.9±1.2 | |||
| Root | 2.6 | 63.0 | 21.5±2.0 | 1.7 | 6.7 | 2.9±2.5 | 6.143 (0.001)* | 100*** | |
| Leaf | 2.3 | 57.0 | 19.8±1.8 | 1.6 | 3.4 | 2.2±0.6 | |||
| Fruit | 3.1 | 49.0 | 26.4±1.9 | 1.40 | 3.1 | 2.2±0.5 | |||
| Stem | 1.8 | 44.2 | 23.3±1.4 | 1.7 | 4.0 | 2.3±0.8 | |||
Abbreviations: *t, significant at p<0.05; n, 7; SD, Standard Deviation.
Sources: WHO Maximum Limit of Heavy Metals in C. papaya****;35 **;36 ***;37–39
pH, EC and Heavy Metals Concentrations in Soil
| 3.7 | 5.4 | 4.7±0.7 | 6.4 | 6.9 | 6.6±0.2 | 6.074 (0.001)* | - | - | |
| 1050.0 | 5240.0 | 1662.3±76.4 | 360.0 | 708.0 | 417.0±13.5 | 4.275 (0.005)* | - | - | |
| 56.9 | 93.4 | 73.6±12.7 | 15.8 | 36.7 | 21.9±7.2 | 13.057 (0.000)* | 300 | 85 | |
| 29.6 | 53.1 | 38.4±9.8 | 5.9 | 36.2 | 17.1±1.2 | 5.409 (0.002)* | - | 0.3 | |
| 9.2 | 44.1 | 20.3±1.2 | 1.1 | 10.4 | 4.7±0.3 | 4.699 (0.003)* | 70 | 0.8 | |
| 20.1 | 114.0 | 56.1±3.7 | 2.8 | 9.4 | 5.4±0.2 | 3.745 (0.01)* | 250 | 36 | |
| 2.5 | 104.0 | 47.8±4.1 | 2.5 | 5.0 | 3.2±0.8 | 2.910 (0.027)* | 300 | 140 | |
Abbreviations: *t, significant at p<0.05; n, 7; SD, Standard Deviation.
Sources: USEPA and DPR Maximum Allowable Limits of Heavy Metal in Soil **;40 ***;41,42
Translocation Factor
| 128.4 | 51.4 | 2.49 | 47.3 | 18.5 | 2.56 | |
| 92.4 | 26.7 | 3.46 | 30.6 | 12.6 | 2.43 | |
| 38.2 | 11.1 | 3.44 | 7.6 | 3.4 | 2.24 | |
| 118.3 | 37.1 | 3.19 | 9.4 | 2.1 | 4.47 | |
| 69.5 | 21.5 | 3.23 | 6.7 | 2.9 | 2.31 | |
Relationship in pH, EC and Heavy Metals between Carica papaya Tissues and Soil
| 0.785[ | −0.111 | 0.185 | −0.673 | −0.778[ | −0.630 | −0.778[ | |
| 0.761[ | −0.127 | 0.436 | −0.670 | −0.800[ | −0.655 | −0.855[ | |
| 0.800[ | −0.144 | 0.198 | −0.673 | −0.829[ | −0.793[ | −0.667 | |
| 0.809[ | −0.054 | 0.252 | −0.573 | −0.739 | −0.847[ | −0.685 | |
| 0.336 | 0.937[ | 0.126 | 0.555 | −0.198 | −0.378 | −0.432 | |
| 0.306 | 0.571 | −0.036 | 0.054 | −0.607 | −0.500 | −0.429 | |
| 0.234 | 0.679 | −0.036 | 0.198 | −0.393 | −0.571 | −0.393 | |
| 0.414 | 0.786[ | 0.250 | 0.306 | −0.393 | −0.571 | −0.571 | |
| 0.883[ | 0.071 | 0.429 | −0.378 | −0.571 | −0.429 | −0.857[ | |
| 0.901[ | 0.002 | 0.571 | −0.360 | −0.464 | −0.500 | −0.821[ | |
| 0.901[ | −0.214 | 0.536 | −0.649 | −0.679 | −0.571 | −0.857[ | |
| 0.883[ | −0.071 | 0.250 | −0.667 | −0.929[ | −0.643 | −0.821[ | |
| 0.282 | 0.667 | −0.252 | 0.464 | −0.090 | 0.162 | −0.180 | |
| −0.342 | 0.321 | −0.821[ | 0.270 | 0.036 | 0.071 | 0.464 | |
| −0.721 | 0.071 | −0.321 | 0.396 | 0.571 | 0.536 | 0.536 | |
| −0.432 | 0.429 | −0.393 | 0.396 | 0.107 | −0.143 | 0.357 | |
| 0.775[ | 0.536 | 0.607 | 0.018 | −0.536 | −0.643 | −0.893[ | |
| 0.126 | 0.143 | 0.750 | 0.162 | 0.015 | −0.143 | −0.321 | |
| 0.018 | −0.214 | 0.857[ | 0.018 | 0.214 | −0.143 | −0.143 | |
| 0.073 | −0.342 | 0.505 | −0.309 | 0.018 | −0.505 | −0.144 | |
| −0.829[ | −0.286 | −0.321 | 0.360 | 0.786[ | 0.964[ | 0.821[ | |
| −0.685 | −0.357 | −0.143 | 0.288 | 0.821[ | 0.893[ | 0.679 | |
| −0.883[ | −0.107 | −0.679 | 0.450 | 0.786[ | 0.893[ | 0.929[ | |
| −0.883[ | −0.107 | −0.679 | 0.450 | 0.786[ | 0.893[ | 0.929[ | |
| −0.775[ | −0.286 | −0.214 | 0.054 | 0.357 | 0.214 | 0.643 | |
| −0.937[ | −0.214 | −0.500 | 0.252 | 0.536 | 0.536 | 0.893[ | |
| −0.991[ | −0.143 | −0.536 | 0.414 | 0.714 | 0.714 | 0.964[ | |
| −0.991[ | −0.179 | −0.464 | 0.414 | 0.786[ | 0.786[ | 0.929[ |
*Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level
Contamination Factors of Heavy Metals in Soils Around Mechanic Workshops
| 2.9 | 3.2 | 3.9 | 4.3 | 2.6 | 3.1 | 3.6 | 21.9±7.2 | |
| 1.7 | 1.7 | 2.3 | 1.8 | 2.9 | 3.1 | 2.1 | 17.1±1.2 | |
| 2.0 | 2.8 | 3.7 | 2.5 | 5.7 | 4.2 | 9.4 | 4.7±0.3 | |
| 5.1 | 7.1 | 3.7 | 5.2 | 21.1 | 12.6 | 17.9 | 5.4±0.2 | |
| 9.2 | 8.6 | 2.7 | 0.8 | 30.0 | 20.9 | 32.5 | 3.2±0.8 | |
Intervals of Contamination/Pollution Index
| <1 | Very slight contamination |
| 0.10–0.25 | Slight contamination |
| 0.26–0.5 | Moderate contamination |
| 0.51–0.75 | Severe contamination |
| 0.76–1.00 | Very severe contamination |
| 1.10–2.0 | Slight pollution |
| 2.1–4.0 | Moderate pollution |
| 4.1–9.0 | Severe pollution |
| 9.1–16.0 | Very severe pollution |
| >16.0 | Excessive pollution |
Source: Lacatusu, 1998 43