| Literature DB >> 30524506 |
Rogatien Charlet1,2,3, Clovis Bortolus1,2,3, Melissandre Barbet1,2,3, Boualem Sendid1,2,3, Samir Jawhara1,2,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The intestinal microbiota plays a crucial role in the maintenance of gut homeostasis. Changes in crosstalk between the intestinal epithelial cells, immune cells and the microbiota are critically involved in the development of inflammatory bowel disease. In the experimental mouse model, the development of colitis induced by dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) promotes overgrowth of the opportunistic yeast pathogen Candida glabrata. Conversely, fungal colonization aggravates inflammatory parameters. In the present study, we explored the effect of C. glabrata colonization on the diversity of the gut microbiota in a DSS-induced colitis model, and determined the impact of soluble β-glucans on C. glabrata-host interactions.Entities:
Keywords: Anaerobic bacteria; Candida glabrata; Colitis; Enterococcus faecalis; Escherichia coli; Microbiota; β-Glucans
Year: 2018 PMID: 30524506 PMCID: PMC6276212 DOI: 10.1186/s13099-018-0277-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Gut Pathog ISSN: 1757-4749 Impact factor: 4.181
Fig. 1Effect of C. glabrata colonization on DSS-induced colitis. A, B Body weight and clinical analysis of DSS-induced colitis in mice. The six groups consisted of controls (CTL, water), C. glabrata alone (Cg), β-glucans (β-glu), DSS alone (D), DSS + C. glabrata (DCg), and β-glucans + DSS + C. glabrata (β-gluDCg). Clinical score was determined by analyzing changes in stool consistency, body weight loss, and presence of bleeding. The CTL, Cg, and β-glu groups did not show any signs of inflammation. Thus, the curves for CTL, Cg, and β-glu overlapped indicating the absence of clinical activity score for these three groups. **P < 0.001 for DSS (D) and C. glabrata-DSS (DCg) mice vs. controls (CTL), C. glabrata (Cg), β-glucans (β-glu) and C. glabrata + DSS + β-glucans (DCgβ-glu) groups. C Histologic scores. Mice were exposed to 2% DSS in drinking water for 14 days. Scores range from 0 (no changes) to 6 (extensive cell infiltration and tissue damage). D Histologic analysis of the colon in C. glabrata and DSS-induced colitis. Panel (a) is the control group (CTL) receiving only water. Panel (b) corresponds to colon sections from WT mice receiving C. glabrata only. Panel (c) corresponds to colon sections from mice receiving β-glucans only. Panel (e) correspond to colon sections from mice receiving DSS. Panel (g) corresponds to colon sections from mice receiving C. glabrata + DSS. Panel (i) corresponds to colon sections from mice receiving C. glabrata + DSS + β-glucans. In the absence of DSS, no inflammation signs in colon sections were observed between control groups (not inoculated) and those that received C. glabrata or β-glucans (panels a, b, and c). Panels (e) and (g) show a high inflammatory cell infiltrate in the colon wall structures and massive tissue destruction (asterisks). The scale bars represent 50 µm (a, b, c, e, g, and i) and 20 µm (d, f, h, and j)
Fig. 2C. glabrata colonization in mouse DSS-induced colitis. Number of C. glabrata colony forming units (CFU) recovered from stools
Fig. 3Measurement of viable fecal bacteria in DSS-induced colitis. For all experiments, stool bacteria were isolated from mice on day 0 before C. glabrata challenge and DSS treatment. a–d Enumeration of E. coli, E. faecalis, B. thetaiotaomicron, and L. johnsonii CFUs in stool samples (**P < 0.001, *P < 0.05)
Fig. 4Summary of the effects of β-glucan treatment on modulation of cultivable microbiota biodiversity in C. glabrata-DSS treated mice. Each color corresponds to the average percentage of each analyzed species of bacteria according to fourteen days of the experiment
Fig. 5Cytokine and receptor expression in colons. a–c Relative expression levels of IL-1β, IL-10, and PPARγ mRNA in mouse colons (*P < 0.05)