| Literature DB >> 30524299 |
Thiago Montes Fidale1,2,3, Hanna Karen Moreira Antunes4, Leonardo Roever1, Alexandre Gonçalves1,3,5, Guilherme Morais Puga6,3, Romeu Paulo Martins Silva7, Fernando Nazário de Resende1, Fernanda Rodrigues de Souza1,3, Beatriz Montes Fidale1,3, Frederico Balbino Lizardo8, Elmiro Santos Resende1,3.
Abstract
Leucine is a regulator of protein metabolism in vivo and information on its action on effort tolerance of both animals and humans with hyperthyroidism is scarce. The objective of the present study was to verify the influence of leucine supplementation on the effort tolerance of Wistar rats with experimental hyperthyroidism. 40 animals were divided into four groups of ten: control (C), hormone (H), leucine (L), and hormone + leucine (HL). Hyperthyroidism was induced by daily administration of 20 μ⋅g100 g-1 of levothyroxine sodium in aqueous suspension by gavage. Leucine was supplemented by adding 5% of the amino acid to the conventional feed. The animals' blood was collected by cardiac puncture to analyze TSH, T4, and T3 levels. The effort tolerance was determined by the swimming test with a 7% load attached to animals' tails. Statistical analysis was performed using the Shapiro-Wilk normality test, followed by the analysis of variance (ANOVA) of repeated measures of two factors (treatment × time) and Tukey post hoc, with a significance level of p < 0.05. Administering thyroid hormone increased the swimming performance of rats after 14 and 21 days, but with a drop in performance at 28 days. The HL group, on the other hand, had a significantly higher swimming performance compared to the other groups after 28 days of treatment. Leucine supplementation associated with the experimental model of hyperthyroidism improved the performance of rats in a swimming test after 28 days of treatment.Entities:
Keywords: BCAA; Wistar; creatine kinase; exercise; thyrotoxicosis
Year: 2018 PMID: 30524299 PMCID: PMC6256244 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01632
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
FIGURE 1Schematic drawing of the experimental protocol, with T-7, 7 days of adaptation to laboratory environment; HE, experimental hyperthyroidism; SL, supplementation with leucine; T0, initial effort test at last day of the adaptation week; T7, effort test after 7 days of experimental protocol; T14, effort test on the 14th day of the experimental protocol; T21, effort test on the 21st day of the experimental protocol; T28, effort test on the 28th day of the experimental protocol, weighing, blood collection, and euthanasia of the animals.
Analyzed variables: Experimental model of hyperthyroidism promoted a significant increase in T4 values and a decrease inTSH values in the H and HL E groups and leucine supplementation reduced CK-MB concentrations in the L and HL groups.
| Analyzed Variables | Control | Hormone | Hormone + Leucine | Leucine | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anthropometric Variables | Initial BW (g) | 326,2 ± 15,89 | 305,4 ± 23,61 | 301,4 ± 9,55 | 312,0 ± 9,89 |
| Final BW (g) | 348,2 ± 7,32 | 328,8 ± 22,86 | 334,8 ± 12,66 | 328,2 ± 10,44 | |
| Feed consumption | FC (g) | 32 ± 3 | 36 ± 2 | 37 ± 4 | 32 ± 6 |
| Blood variables analyzed | T3 (ng⋅mL-1) | 1.98 ± 0.5 | 2.29 ± 0.9 | 2.31 ± 0.6 | 2.06 ± 0.5 |
| T4 (μg⋅dL-1) | 4.76 ± 0.8 | 12.56 ± 3.4∗† | 12.46 ± 2.3∗† | 5.09 ± 1.2 | |
| TSH (ng⋅mL-1) | 1.45 ± 0.35 | 0.39 ± 0.07∗† | 0.42 ± 0.08∗† | 1.36 ± 0.29 | |
| CK-MB (U/L) | 1005,75 ± 314 | 934,31 ± 363 | 538,75 ± 112∗ | 533,99 ± 43∗ | |
FIGURE 2Effort test T0, presented in Graph A, performed after the adaptation week; T7 effort test, presented in Graph B, performed after 7 days of experiment; T-14 exercise test, presented in Graph C, performed after 14 days of experiment, indicating an increase in swimming performance in group H; T-21 exercise test, presented in Graph D, performed after 21 days of experiment, evidencing the maintenance of swimming performance gains by group H; Effort test T-28, presented in Graph E, performed after 28 days of experiment, showing a decrease in swimming performance by group H and increased performance by the HL group. C, control group; H, hormone group; HL, hormone + leucine group; L, leucine group. ∗p < 0.05 compared to Group C (ANOVA); †p < 0.05 compared to Group L (ANOVA); § p < 0.05 in relation to the HL Group (ANOVA).