| Literature DB >> 30523428 |
Wei Guo1,2, Rui Yamada3, Junji Saida3, Shulin Lü4, Shusen Wu5.
Abstract
The rejuvenation behavior of an Zr50Cu40Al10 (at.%) metallic glass upon cryogenic cycling treatment has been investigated. At a high casting temperature, the microstructure of the glass is quite homogenous and thus, internal stress cannot be generated during cycling. Therefore, the glass cannot be rejuvenated by cryogenic cycling treatment. In the contrary, by lowering the casting temperature, nano-sized heterogeneity can be induced and subsequently generates the internal stress and rejuvenates the glass. Once the glass is rejuvenated, the more induced free volume can plasticize the glass with a higher plastic strain. These findings point out that the synthesis conditions can tailor the heterogeneity of the glass and subsequently affect the following rejuvenation behavior upon thermal treatment. It can also help understand the mechanisms of rejuvenation of metallic glass upon cryogenic cycling treatment.Entities:
Keywords: Casting temperature; Cryogenic cycling; Heterogeneity; Metallic glass; Rejuvenation
Year: 2018 PMID: 30523428 PMCID: PMC6283810 DOI: 10.1186/s11671-018-2816-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanoscale Res Lett ISSN: 1556-276X Impact factor: 4.703
Fig. 1a XRD and b DSC curves of both As-cast and DCT30 samples cast at HT, c heat-flow as a function of time during isothermal annealing (740 K), and (d) specific heat of both As-cast and DCT30 samples cast at HT
Fig. 2a, b Bright-field TEM images of As-cast and DCT30 samples cast at HT. c Compressive stress-strain curves of As-cast and DCT30 samples cast at HT
A summary of thermal and mechanical data for the sample in this work
| HT | As-cast | 690 ± 5 | 780 ± 4 | 12.6 ± 0.2 | 12.6 ± 0.5 | 105 ± 5 | 2027 ± 15 | 1865 ± 22 | 2.3 ± 0.2 | 0.5 ± 0.2 |
| DCT30 | 688 ± 4 | 781 ± 5 | 12.5 ± 0.3 | 12.9 ± 0.3 | 114 ± 4 | 1983 ± 20 | 1873 ± 15 | 1.9 ± 0.1 | 0.2 ± 0.1 | |
| LT | As-cast | 695 ± 5 | 781 ± 3 | 13.9 ± 0.5 | 10.7 ± 0.2 | 123 ± 5 | 1998 ± 18 | 1765 ± 18 | 4.3 ± 0.2 | 2.8 ± 0.2 |
| DCT30 | 697 ± 3 | 774 ± 5 | 14.2 ± 0.3 | 13.0 ± 0.3 | 107 ± 6 | 2049 ± 19 | 1640 ± 13 | 5.9 ± 0.3 | 4.3 ± 0.3 | |
T glass transition temperature, T onset crystallization temperature, t incubation time of crystallization, ΔHrelax enthalpy of relaxation, E Young’s modulus, σ fracture stress, σ yielding stress, ε fracture strain, ε plastic strain
Fig. 3a XRD and b DSC curves of both As-cast and DCT30 samples cast at LT. c Heat-flow as a function of time during isothermal annealing (740 K) and d specific heat of both As-cast and DCT30 samples cast at LT
Fig. 4a Compressive stress-strain curves of As-cast and DCT30 samples cast at LT. b, c Bright-field TEM images of As-cast and DCT30 samples cast at LT
Fig. 5Schematic illustration of rejuvenation behavior for both HT and LT samples. Homogeneous structure of HT sample cannot generate internal stress upon DCT, while heterogeneity in LT samples helps generate internal stress at the interfaces. Therefore, rejuvenation behavior can be only observed in LT samples