L C Liebrand1, M W A Caan2, P R Schuurman3, P van den Munckhof3, M Figee4, D Denys5, G A van Wingen4. 1. Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Meibergdreef 9, 1105, AZ, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Electronic address: L.C.Liebrand@amc.nl. 2. Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Meibergdreef 9, 1105, AZ, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 3. Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Meibergdreef 9, 1105, AZ, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 4. Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Meibergdreef 9, 1105, AZ, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 5. Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Meibergdreef 9, 1105, AZ, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Royal Academy of Arts and Sciences, Meibergdreef 47, 1105, BA, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The ventral anterior limb of the internal capsule (vALIC) is a target for deep brain stimulation (DBS) in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Conventional surgical planning is based on anatomical landmarks. OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that treatment response depends on the location of the active DBS contacts with respect to individual white matter bundle trajectories. This study thus aimed to elucidate whether vALIC DBS can benefit from bundle-specific targeting. METHODS: We performed tractography analysis of two fiber bundles, the anterior thalamic radiation (ATR) and the supero-lateral branch of the medial forebrain bundle (MFB), using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) data. Twelve patients (10 females) who had received bilateral vALIC DBS for at least 12 months were included. We related the change in OCD symptom severity on the Yale-Brown obsessive-compulsive scale (Y-BOCS) between baseline and one-year follow-up with the distances from the active contacts to the ATR and MFB. We further analyzed the relation between treatment response and stimulation sites in standard anatomical space. RESULTS: We found that active stimulation of the vALIC closer to the MFB than the ATR was associated with better treatment outcome (p = 0.04; r2 = 0.34). In standard space, stimulation sites were largely overlapping between treatment (non)responders, suggesting response is independent of the anatomically defined electrode position. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that vALIC DBS for OCD may benefit from MFB-specific implantation and highlight the importance of corticolimbic connections in OCD response to DBS. Prospective investigation is necessary to validate the clinical use of MFB targeting.
BACKGROUND: The ventral anterior limb of the internal capsule (vALIC) is a target for deep brain stimulation (DBS) in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Conventional surgical planning is based on anatomical landmarks. OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that treatment response depends on the location of the active DBS contacts with respect to individual white matter bundle trajectories. This study thus aimed to elucidate whether vALIC DBS can benefit from bundle-specific targeting. METHODS: We performed tractography analysis of two fiber bundles, the anterior thalamic radiation (ATR) and the supero-lateral branch of the medial forebrain bundle (MFB), using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) data. Twelve patients (10 females) who had received bilateral vALIC DBS for at least 12 months were included. We related the change in OCD symptom severity on the Yale-Brown obsessive-compulsive scale (Y-BOCS) between baseline and one-year follow-up with the distances from the active contacts to the ATR and MFB. We further analyzed the relation between treatment response and stimulation sites in standard anatomical space. RESULTS: We found that active stimulation of the vALIC closer to the MFB than the ATR was associated with better treatment outcome (p = 0.04; r2 = 0.34). In standard space, stimulation sites were largely overlapping between treatment (non)responders, suggesting response is independent of the anatomically defined electrode position. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that vALIC DBS for OCD may benefit from MFB-specific implantation and highlight the importance of corticolimbic connections in OCD response to DBS. Prospective investigation is necessary to validate the clinical use of MFB targeting.
Authors: E H Middlebrooks; R A Domingo; T Vivas-Buitrago; L Okromelidze; T Tsuboi; J K Wong; R S Eisinger; L Almeida; M R Burns; A Horn; R J Uitti; R E Wharen; V M Holanda; S S Grewal Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2020-08-13 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Isidoor O Bergfeld; Eva Dijkstra; Ilse Graat; Pelle de Koning; Bastijn J G van den Boom; Tara Arbab; Nienke Vulink; Damiaan Denys; Ingo Willuhn; Roel J T Mocking Journal: Curr Top Behav Neurosci Date: 2021
Authors: Andrew Guzick; Patrick J Hunt; Kelly R Bijanki; Sophie C Schneider; Sameer A Sheth; Wayne K Goodman; Eric A Storch Journal: Expert Rev Neurother Date: 2019-11-22 Impact factor: 4.618
Authors: Nataly Raviv; Michael D Staudt; Andrew K Rock; Jacquelyn MacDonell; Julia Slyer; Julie G Pilitsis Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2020-11-16 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Bryan Howell; Faical Isbaine; Jon T Willie; Enrico Opri; Robert E Gross; Coralie De Hemptinne; Philip A Starr; Cameron C McIntyre; Svjetlana Miocinovic Journal: Brain Stimul Date: 2021-03-20 Impact factor: 8.955
Authors: Michael D Staudt; Nader Pouratian; Jonathan P Miller; Clement Hamani; Nataly Raviv; Guy M McKhann; Jorge A Gonzalez-Martinez; Julie G Pilitsis Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2021-03-15 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Elizabeth Shephard; Emily R Stern; Odile A van den Heuvel; Daniel L C Costa; Marcelo C Batistuzzo; Priscilla B G Godoy; Antonio C Lopes; Andre R Brunoni; Marcelo Q Hoexter; Roseli G Shavitt; Y C Janardhan Reddy; Christine Lochner; Dan J Stein; H Blair Simpson; Euripedes C Miguel Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 2021-01-07 Impact factor: 15.992
Authors: Daria Nesterovich Anderson; Alan D Dorval; John D Rolston; Stefan M Pulst; Collin J Anderson Journal: J Neural Eng Date: 2021-04-06 Impact factor: 5.379