Literature DB >> 30521950

Dynamic functional connectivity during task performance and rest predicts individual differences in attention across studies.

Angus Ho Ching Fong1, Kwangsun Yoo2, Monica D Rosenberg2, Sheng Zhang3, Chiang-Shan R Li4, Dustin Scheinost5, R Todd Constable6, Marvin M Chun7.   

Abstract

Dynamic functional connectivity (DFC) aims to maximize resolvable information from functional brain scans by considering temporal changes in network structure. Recent work has demonstrated that static, i.e. time-invariant resting-state and task-based FC predicts individual differences in behavior, including attention. Here, we show that DFC predicts attention performance across individuals. Sliding-window FC matrices were generated from fMRI data collected during rest and attention task performance by calculating Pearson's r between every pair of nodes of a whole-brain atlas within overlapping 10-60s time segments. Next, variance in r values across windows was taken to quantify temporal variability in the strength of each connection, resulting in a DFC connectome for each individual. In a leave-one-subject-out-cross-validation approach, partial-least-square-regression (PLSR) models were then trained to predict attention task performance from DFC matrices. Predicted and observed attention scores were significantly correlated, indicating successful out-of-sample predictions across rest and task conditions. Combining DFC and static FC features numerically improves predictions over either model alone, but the improvement was not statistically significant. Moreover, dynamic and combined models generalized to two independent data sets (participants performing the Attention Network Task and the stop-signal task). Edges with significant PLSR coefficients concentrated in visual, motor, and executive-control brain networks; moreover, most of these coefficients were negative. Thus, better attention may rely on more stable, i.e. less variable, information flow between brain regions.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dynamic functional connectivity; Individual differences; Partial least squares regression; Predictive modeling; Sustained attention

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30521950      PMCID: PMC6401236          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.11.057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  61 in total

1.  The activation of attentional networks.

Authors:  Jin Fan; Bruce D McCandliss; John Fossella; Jonathan I Flombaum; Michael I Posner
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-03-19       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 2.  Spontaneous fluctuations in brain activity observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Michael D Fox; Marcus E Raichle
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  When the brain takes a break: a model-based analysis of mind wandering.

Authors:  Matthias Mittner; Wouter Boekel; Adrienne M Tucker; Brandon M Turner; Andrew Heathcote; Birte U Forstmann
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Distributed patterns of occipito-parietal functional connectivity predict the precision of visual working memory.

Authors:  Elena M Galeano Weber; Tim Hahn; Kirsten Hilger; Christian J Fiebach
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  On the Stability of BOLD fMRI Correlations.

Authors:  Timothy O Laumann; Abraham Z Snyder; Anish Mitra; Evan M Gordon; Caterina Gratton; Babatunde Adeyemo; Adrian W Gilmore; Steven M Nelson; Jeff J Berg; Deanna J Greene; John E McCarthy; Enzo Tagliazucchi; Helmut Laufs; Bradley L Schlaggar; Nico U F Dosenbach; Steven E Petersen
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Neuronal Origin of the Temporal Dynamics of Spontaneous BOLD Activity Correlation.

Authors:  Teppei Matsui; Tomonari Murakami; Kenichi Ohki
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Underconnected, But Not Broken? Dynamic Functional Connectivity MRI Shows Underconnectivity in Autism Is Linked to Increased Intra-Individual Variability Across Time.

Authors:  Maryam Falahpour; Wesley K Thompson; Angela E Abbott; Afrooz Jahedi; Mark E Mulvey; Michael Datko; Thomas T Liu; Ralph-Axel Müller
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2016-04-22

8.  The effects of methylphenidate on cerebral activations to salient stimuli in healthy adults.

Authors:  Olivia M Farr; Sien Hu; David Matuskey; Sheng Zhang; Osama Abdelghany; Chiang-Shan R Li
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 3.157

9.  Dynamic functional connectivity analysis reveals transient states of dysconnectivity in schizophrenia.

Authors:  E Damaraju; E A Allen; A Belger; J M Ford; S McEwen; D H Mathalon; B A Mueller; G D Pearlson; S G Potkin; A Preda; J A Turner; J G Vaidya; T G van Erp; V D Calhoun
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 4.881

10.  Resting-state functional connectivity predicts neuroticism and extraversion in novel individuals.

Authors:  Wei-Ting Hsu; Monica D Rosenberg; Dustin Scheinost; R Todd Constable; Marvin M Chun
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 3.436

View more
  28 in total

1.  Dynamic brain network configurations during rest and an attention task with frequent occurrence of mind wandering.

Authors:  Ekaterina Denkova; Jason S Nomi; Lucina Q Uddin; Amishi P Jha
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-08-04       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  The Role of Visual Experience in Individual Differences of Brain Connectivity.

Authors:  Sriparna Sen; Nanak Nihal Khalsa; Ningcong Tong; Smadar Ovadia-Caro; Xiaoying Wang; Yanchao Bi; Ella Striem-Amit
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 6.709

3.  Altered Cerebro-Cerebellar Dynamic Functional Connectivity in Alcohol Use Disorder: a Resting-State fMRI Study.

Authors:  Majd Abdallah; Natalie M Zahr; Manojkumar Saranathan; Nicolas Honnorat; Nicolas Farrugia; Adolf Pfefferbaum; Edith V Sullivan; Sandra Chanraud
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 3.847

4.  Structural and Functional Brain Parameters Related to Cognitive Performance Across Development: Replication and Extension of the Parieto-Frontal Integration Theory in a Single Sample.

Authors:  Ruben C Gur; Ellyn R Butler; Tyler M Moore; Adon F G Rosen; Kosha Ruparel; Theodore D Satterthwaite; David R Roalf; Efstathios D Gennatas; Warren B Bilker; Russell T Shinohara; Allison Port; Mark A Elliott; Ragini Verma; Christos Davatzikos; Daniel H Wolf; John A Detre; Raquel E Gur
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Dynamic Functional Network Connectivity Changes Associated with fMRI Neurofeedback of Right Premotor Cortex.

Authors:  Zhiying Long; Zhaoxi Guo; Zhitao Guo; Hang Zhang; Li Yao
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-04-30

6.  Neural heterogeneity underlying late adolescent motivational processing is linked to individual differences in behavioral sensation seeking.

Authors:  Michael I Demidenko; Edward D Huntley; Alexander S Weigard; Daniel P Keating; Adriene M Beltz
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 4.164

7.  Task-induced brain functional connectivity as a representation of schema for mediating unsupervised and supervised learning dynamics in language acquisition.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Akama; Yixin Yuan; Shunji Awazu
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 2.708

8.  Key Intrinsic Connectivity Networks for Individual Identification With Siamese Long Short-Term Memory.

Authors:  Yeong-Hun Park; Seong A Shin; Seonggyu Kim; Jong-Min Lee
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Segregation, integration, and balance of large-scale resting brain networks configure different cognitive abilities.

Authors:  Rong Wang; Mianxin Liu; Xinhong Cheng; Ying Wu; Andrea Hildebrandt; Changsong Zhou
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Task-induced brain connectivity promotes the detection of individual differences in brain-behavior relationships.

Authors:  Rongtao Jiang; Nianming Zuo; Judith M Ford; Shile Qi; Dongmei Zhi; Chuanjun Zhuo; Yong Xu; Zening Fu; Juan Bustillo; Jessica A Turner; Vince D Calhoun; Jing Sui
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.