Literature DB >> 30521679

Hysteroscopy for treating subfertility associated with suspected major uterine cavity abnormalities.

Jan Bosteels1, Steffi van Wessel, Steven Weyers, Frank J Broekmans, Thomas M D'Hooghe, M Y Bongers, Ben Willem J Mol.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Observational studies suggest higher pregnancy rates after the hysteroscopic removal of endometrial polyps, submucous fibroids, uterine septum or intrauterine adhesions, which are present in 10% to 15% of women seeking treatment for subfertility.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of the hysteroscopic removal of endometrial polyps, submucous fibroids, uterine septum or intrauterine adhesions suspected on ultrasound, hysterosalpingography, diagnostic hysteroscopy or any combination of these methods in women with otherwise unexplained subfertility or prior to intrauterine insemination (IUI), in vitro fertilisation (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). SEARCH
METHODS: We searched the following databases from their inception to 16 April 2018; The Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Studies Online, ; MEDLINE, Embase , CINAHL , and other electronic sources of trials including trial registers, sources of unpublished literature, and reference lists. We handsearched the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) conference abstracts and proceedings (from 1 January 2014 to 12 May 2018) and we contacted experts in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised comparison between operative hysteroscopy versus control for unexplained subfertility associated with suspected major uterine cavity abnormalities.Randomised comparison between operative hysteroscopy versus control for suspected major uterine cavity abnormalities prior to medically assisted reproduction.Primary outcomes were live birth and hysteroscopy complications. Secondary outcomes were pregnancy and miscarriage. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed studies for inclusion and risk of bias, and extracted data. We contacted study authors for additional information. MAIN
RESULTS: Two studies met the inclusion criteria.1. Randomised comparison between operative hysteroscopy versus control for unexplained subfertility associated with suspected major uterine cavity abnormalities.In women with otherwise unexplained subfertility and submucous fibroids, we were uncertain whether hysteroscopic myomectomy improved the clinical pregnancy rate compared to expectant management (odds ratio (OR) 2.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.97 to 6.17; P = 0.06, 94 women; very low-quality evidence). We are uncertain whether hysteroscopic myomectomy improves the miscarriage rate compared to expectant management (OR 1.54, 95% CI 0.47 to 5.00; P = 0.47, 94 women; very low-quality evidence). We found no data on live birth or hysteroscopy complication rates. We found no studies in women with endometrial polyps, intrauterine adhesions or uterine septum for this randomised comparison.2. Randomised comparison between operative hysteroscopy versus control for suspected major uterine cavity abnormalities prior to medically assisted reproduction.The hysteroscopic removal of polyps prior to IUI may have improved the clinical pregnancy rate compared to diagnostic hysteroscopy only: if 28% of women achieved a clinical pregnancy without polyp removal, the evidence suggested that 63% of women (95% CI 45% to 89%) achieved a clinical pregnancy after the hysteroscopic removal of the endometrial polyps (OR 4.41, 95% CI 2.45 to 7.96; P < 0.00001, 204 women; low-quality evidence). We found no data on live birth, hysteroscopy complication or miscarriage rates in women with endometrial polyps prior to IUI. We found no studies in women with submucous fibroids, intrauterine adhesions or uterine septum prior to IUI or in women with all types of suspected uterine cavity abnormalities prior to IVF/ICSI. AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: Uncertainty remains concerning an important benefit with the hysteroscopic removal of submucous fibroids for improving the clinical pregnancy rates in women with otherwise unexplained subfertility. The available low-quality evidence suggests that the hysteroscopic removal of endometrial polyps suspected on ultrasound in women prior to IUI may improve the clinical pregnancy rate compared to simple diagnostic hysteroscopy. More research is needed to measure the effectiveness of the hysteroscopic treatment of suspected major uterine cavity abnormalities in women with unexplained subfertility or prior to IUI, IVF or ICSI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30521679      PMCID: PMC6517267          DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009461.pub4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  94 in total

Review 1.  Treatment of endometrial polyps: a systematic review.

Authors:  Marit Lieng; Olav Istre; Erik Qvigstad
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.636

2.  International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment-seeking: potential need and demand for infertility medical care.

Authors:  Jacky Boivin; Laura Bunting; John A Collins; Karl G Nygren
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Outpatient hysteroscopy: traditional versus the 'no-touch' technique.

Authors:  M Sharma; A Taylor; A di Spiezio Sardo; L Buck; G Mastrogamvrakis; I Kosmas; P Tsirkas; A Magos
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 6.531

4.  Twelve-month outcomes for patients undergoing hysteroscopic morcellation of uterine polyps and myomas in an office or ambulatory surgical center.

Authors:  Robert J Rubino; Andrea S Lukes
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 4.137

5.  Clinical effectiveness of transcervical polyp resection in women with endometrial polyps: randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Marit Lieng; Olav Istre; Leiv Sandvik; Vibeke Engh; Erik Qvigstad
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.137

Review 6.  Hysteroscopy for treating subfertility associated with suspected major uterine cavity abnormalities.

Authors:  Jan Bosteels; Jenneke Kasius; Steven Weyers; Frank J Broekmans; Ben Willem J Mol; Thomas M D'Hooghe
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-01-31

7.  Cost-effectiveness of hysteroscopy screening for infertile women.

Authors:  Jenneke C Kasius; René J C Eijkemans; Ben W J Mol; Bart C J M Fauser; Human M Fatemi; Frank J M Broekmans
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 3.828

8.  A randomised controlled trial of Outpatient versus inpatient Polyp Treatment (OPT) for abnormal uterine bleeding.

Authors:  T Justin Clark; Lee J Middleton; Natalie Am Cooper; Lavanya Diwakar; Elaine Denny; Paul Smith; Laura Gennard; Lynda Stobert; Tracy E Roberts; Versha Cheed; Tracey Bingham; Sue Jowett; Elizabeth Brettell; Mary Connor; Sian E Jones; Jane P Daniels
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.014

9.  Efficiency and pregnancy outcome of serial intrauterine device-guided hysteroscopic adhesiolysis of intrauterine synechiae.

Authors:  Recai Pabuccu; Gogsen Onalan; Cemil Kaya; Belgin Selam; Temel Ceyhan; Turkan Ornek; Ebru Kuzudisli
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-09-06       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  The randomised uterine septum transsection trial (TRUST): design and protocol.

Authors:  J F W Rikken; C R Kowalik; M H Emanuel; M Y Bongers; T Spinder; J H de Kruif; K W M Bloemenkamp; F W Jansen; S Veersema; A G M G J Mulders; A L Thurkow; K Hald; A Mohazzab; Y Khalaf; T J Clark; M Farrugia; H A van Vliet; M S Stephenson; F van der Veen; M van Wely; B W J Mol; M Goddijn
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 2.809

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Modern assessment of the uterine cavity and fallopian tubes in the era of high-efficacy assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Kate Devine; Shelley Dolitsky; Inga Ludwin; Artur Ludwin
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 7.490

Review 2.  Uterine Septum with or without Hysteroscopic Metroplasty: Impact on Fertility and Obstetrical Outcomes-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Research.

Authors:  Marco Noventa; Giulia Spagnol; Matteo Marchetti; Carlo Saccardi; Giulio Bonaldo; Antonio Simone Laganà; Francesco Cavallin; Alessandra Andrisani; Guido Ambrosini; Salvatore Giovanni Vitale; Luis Alonso Pacheco; Sergio Haimovich; Attilio Di Spiezio Sardo; Jose Carugno; Marco Scioscia; Simone Garzon; Stefano Bettocchi; Giovanni Buzzaccarini; Roberto Tozzi; Amerigo Vitagliano
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  The significance of transcervical ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of symptomatic fibroids: results of an expert consensus from German-speaking countries.

Authors:  Thomas Römer; Ralf Bends; Ladina Christoffel; Ricardo Felberbaum; Thomas Hildebrandt; Ivo Meinhold-Heerlein; Michael Mueller; Peter Oppelt; Stefan P Renner; Ingo B Runnebaum; Sven Schiermeier; Elvin Piriyev; Bernhard Uhl; David Toub
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 2.493

4.  Insights on Hysteroscopic Procedures and Their Place in Romanian Gynecologic Practice-The Experience of Two Medical Units.

Authors:  Alexandra Matei; Cringu Ionescu; Florin Gorun; Diana Gheorghiu; George-Alexandru Rosu; Adelina Dan; Romina-Marina Sima; Cristian George Furau; Corina Ilinca; Dan Navolan
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-06

5.  Operative hysteroscopy platform at a university teaching hospital: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Naser Al-Husban; Rana Abu Rokbeh
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 1.671

6.  Optimal time interval between hysteroscopic polypectomy and frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Yi-An Tu; Po-Kai Yang; Shee-Uan Chen; Jehn-Hsiahn Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Hysteroscopy as An Investigational Operative Procedure in Primary and Secondary Infertility: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Fortunato Genovese; Federica Di Guardo; Morena Maria Monteleone; Valentina D'Urso; Francesco Maria Colaleo; Vito Leanza; Marco Palumbo
Journal:  Int J Fertil Steril       Date:  2021-03-11

8.  Management of Cervical Ectopic Pregnancy with Small-Caliber Hysteroscopy.

Authors:  Rastko Maglic; Aleksandar Rakic; Branka Nikolic; Dragana Maglic; Predrag Jokanovic; Sladjana Mihajlovic
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2021 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 9.  Diagnosis and Management of Infertility: A Review.

Authors:  Sandra Ann Carson; Amanda N Kallen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 157.335

Review 10.  Anti-adhesion Gel versus No gel following Operative Hysteroscopy prior to Subsequent fertility Treatment or timed InterCourse (AGNOHSTIC), a randomised controlled trial: protocol.

Authors:  S van Wessel; T Hamerlynck; V Schutyser; C Tomassetti; C Wyns; M Nisolle; J Verguts; R Colman; S Weyers; J Bosteels
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2021-02-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.