Hoda Badr1, Krista Herbert2, Karishma Chhabria1, Vlad C Sandulache3, Elizabeth Y Chiao1, Timothy Wagner4. 1. Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas. 2. Department of Psychology, Rowan University, Glassboro, New Jersey. 3. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas. 4. Department of Radiation Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) experience significant physical and psychological morbidity during radiotherapy (RT) that contributes to treatment interruptions and a poor quality of life. Although spouses/partners can help by encouraging patient self-management (eg, self-care) during RT, they often experience high psychological distress rates, lack basic health care knowledge and skills, and report increased marital conflict regarding patient self-management. The current pilot study examined the feasibility and acceptability of a 6-session telephone-based intervention called Spouses coping with the Head And neck Radiation Experience (SHARE), which teaches self-management, communication, and coping skills to patients with HNC and their spouses. The treatment effects of SHARE compared with usual medical care (UMC) in controlling patient physical symptoms and improving patient/spouse psychological and marital functioning also were examined. METHODS:Thirty patients who initiated RT and their spouses (60 participants; 40% of whom were racial/ethnic minorities) were randomized to SHARE or UMC, and preintervention and postintervention assessments were completed. RESULTS: Solid recruitment (70%) and low attrition rates (7%) demonstrated feasibility. Strong program evaluations and homework completion rates (72%) supported acceptability. Significant treatment effects (medium in magnitude) were observed for SHARE compared with UMC with regard to HNC-specific physical symptom burden (Cohen's d, -0.89) and symptom interference (Cohen's d, -0.86). Medium to large effects favoring SHARE also were found for patient and spouse depressive symptoms (Cohen's d, -0.84) and cancer-specific distress (Cohen's d, -1.05). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the current study support the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of SHARE. They also suggest that programs that empower HNC couples with the necessary skills to coordinate care and manage the challenges of RT together hold great promise for controlling a patient's physical symptoms and improving the psychological functioning of both partners.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) experience significant physical and psychological morbidity during radiotherapy (RT) that contributes to treatment interruptions and a poor quality of life. Although spouses/partners can help by encouraging patient self-management (eg, self-care) during RT, they often experience high psychological distress rates, lack basic health care knowledge and skills, and report increased marital conflict regarding patient self-management. The current pilot study examined the feasibility and acceptability of a 6-session telephone-based intervention called Spouses coping with the Head And neck Radiation Experience (SHARE), which teaches self-management, communication, and coping skills to patients with HNC and their spouses. The treatment effects of SHARE compared with usual medical care (UMC) in controlling patient physical symptoms and improving patient/spouse psychological and marital functioning also were examined. METHODS: Thirty patients who initiated RT and their spouses (60 participants; 40% of whom were racial/ethnic minorities) were randomized to SHARE or UMC, and preintervention and postintervention assessments were completed. RESULTS: Solid recruitment (70%) and low attrition rates (7%) demonstrated feasibility. Strong program evaluations and homework completion rates (72%) supported acceptability. Significant treatment effects (medium in magnitude) were observed for SHARE compared with UMC with regard to HNC-specific physical symptom burden (Cohen's d, -0.89) and symptom interference (Cohen's d, -0.86). Medium to large effects favoring SHARE also were found for patient and spouse depressive symptoms (Cohen's d, -0.84) and cancer-specific distress (Cohen's d, -1.05). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the current study support the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of SHARE. They also suggest that programs that empower HNC couples with the necessary skills to coordinate care and manage the challenges of RT together hold great promise for controlling a patient's physical symptoms and improving the psychological functioning of both partners.
Keywords:
M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory Head and Neck survey (MDASI-HN); couple-based intervention; head and neck cancer; psychological distress; supportive care
Authors: Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw; Simone E Eerenstein; Mecheline H Van der Linden; Dirk J Kuik; Remco de Bree; C Rene Leemans Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: E R Gritz; C L Carmack; C de Moor; A Coscarelli; C W Schacherer; E G Meyers; E Abemayor Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1999-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Tina M Gremore; Bruce Brockstein; Laura S Porter; Stephanie Brenner; Tiffany Benfield; Donald H Baucom; Tamara Golden Sher; David Atkins Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2020-10-26 Impact factor: 3.603