Luke Keele1, Qingyuan Zhao2, Rachel R Kelz3, Dylan Small2. 1. Departments of Surgery. 2. Statistics, University of Pennsylvania. 3. Department of Surgery, Center for Surgery and Health Economics, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Instrumental variable (IV) methods are becoming an increasingly important tool in health services research as they can provide consistent estimates of causal effects in the presence of unobserved confounding. However, investigators must provide justifications that the IV is independent with any unmeasured confounder and its effect on the outcome occurs only through receipt of the exposure. These assumptions, while plausible in some contexts, cannot be verified from the data. METHODS: Falsification tests can be applied to provide evidence for the key IV assumptions. A falsification test cannot prove the assumptions hold, but can provide decisive evidence when the assumption fails. We provide a general overview of falsification tests for IV designs. We highlight a falsification test that utilizes a subpopulation of the data where an overwhelming proportion of units are treated or untreated. If the IV assumptions hold, we should find the intention-to-treat effect is zero within these subpopulations. RESULTS: We demonstrate the usage of falsification tests for IV designs using an IV known as tendency to operate from health services research. We show that the falsification test provides no evidence against the IV assumptions in this application.
BACKGROUND: Instrumental variable (IV) methods are becoming an increasingly important tool in health services research as they can provide consistent estimates of causal effects in the presence of unobserved confounding. However, investigators must provide justifications that the IV is independent with any unmeasured confounder and its effect on the outcome occurs only through receipt of the exposure. These assumptions, while plausible in some contexts, cannot be verified from the data. METHODS: Falsification tests can be applied to provide evidence for the key IV assumptions. A falsification test cannot prove the assumptions hold, but can provide decisive evidence when the assumption fails. We provide a general overview of falsification tests for IV designs. We highlight a falsification test that utilizes a subpopulation of the data where an overwhelming proportion of units are treated or untreated. If the IV assumptions hold, we should find the intention-to-treat effect is zero within these subpopulations. RESULTS: We demonstrate the usage of falsification tests for IV designs using an IV known as tendency to operate from health services research. We show that the falsification test provides no evidence against the IV assumptions in this application.
Authors: Neil M Davies; Kyla H Thomas; Amy E Taylor; Gemma M J Taylor; Richard M Martin; Marcus R Munafò; Frank Windmeijer Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2017-12-01 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Bian Liu; Serena Zhan; Karen M Wilson; Madhu Mazumdar; Lihua Li Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-04-26 Impact factor: 4.614