| Literature DB >> 30520276 |
Yuan Qu1,2, Chiye Li1,2, Junhui Shi3, Ruimin Chen4, Song Xu5, Hasan Rafsanjani5, Konstantin Maslov3, Hannah Krigman6, Laura Garvey6, Peng Hu1,2, Peinan Zhao1, Karen Meyers1, Emily Diveley1, Stephanie Pizzella1, Lisa Muench1, Nina Punyamurthy1, Naomi Goldstein1, Oji Onwumere1, Mariana Alisio1, Kaytelyn Meyenburg1, Jennifer Maynard1, Kristi Helm1, Janessia Slaughter1, Sabrina Barber1, Tracy Burger1, Christine Kramer1, Jessica Chubiz1, Monica Anderson1, Ronald McCarthy1, Sarah K England1, George A Macones1, Qifa Zhou4, K Kirk Shung4, Jun Zou5, Molly J Stout1, Methodius Tuuli1, Lihong V Wang3.
Abstract
Photoacoustic endoscopy offers in vivo examination of the visceral tissue using endogenous contrast, but its typical B-scan rate is ∼10 Hz, restricted by the speed of the scanning unit and the laser pulse repetition rate. Here, we present a transvaginal fast-scanning optical-resolution photoacoustic endoscope with a 250-Hz B-scan rate over a 3-mm scanning range. Using this modality, we not only illustrated the morphological differences of vasculatures among the human ectocervix, uterine body, and sublingual mucosa but also showed the longitudinal and cross-sectional differences of cervical vasculatures in pregnant women. This technology is promising for screening the visceral pathological changes associated with angiogenesis. (2018) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE).Entities:
Keywords: cervical imaging; fast scanning; microelectromechanical system scanning mirror; optical-resolution photoacoustic endoscopy
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30520276 PMCID: PMC6279961 DOI: 10.1117/1.JBO.23.12.121617
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Biomed Opt ISSN: 1083-3668 Impact factor: 3.170
Fig. 1Schematic of the fsOR-PAE probe and its peripheral systems. (a) Setup of fsOR-PAE. CS, control system; GGD, ground glass diffuser; NDF, variable neutral density filter; PD, photodetector. (b) Photograph of the fsOR-PAE probe. A linear actuator in the white housing drives the azimuth scanning. (c) Schematic of the acoustic-optical coaxial confocal alignment in the probe. MEMS drives the scanning parallel to the cylindrical axis. AW, acoustic wave; LB, laser beam; MEMS, microelectromechanical system scanning mirror; SMF, single-mode fiber; UT, ultrasonic transducer.
Fig. 2Scanning mechanism of the fsOR-PAE probe (Video 1, MP4, 3.78 MB [URL: https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.23.12.121617.1]).
Fig. 3Characterization of the fsOR-PAE probe. (a) Lateral resolution test on a sharp edge. ESF, edge spread function; LSF, line spread function derived from ESF. (b) Axial resolution test on a tungsten wire. (c) Photograph of a metal grid. (d) Maximum amplitude projection image computed from the region enclosed by the red rectangle in (c). (e) B-scan image in the plane highlighted by the blue dashed line in (d).
Fig. 4Ex vivo fsOR-PAE images of (a) the human ectocervix, (b) the serosal layer of the uterine body, and (c) the sublingual mucosa. (d) Standard hematoxylin and eosin histology of the ectocervix conducted after fsOR-PAE imaging, showing no tissue damage.
Fig. 5Volume-rendered image (Video 2, MP4, 890 KB [URL: https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.23.12.121617.2]).
Fig. 6In vivo fsOR-PAE images acquired from the first pregnant woman at (a) 32 and (b) 36 weeks of gestation. (c) In vivo fsOR-PAE image acquired from the second pregnant woman at 36 weeks of gestation.
Fig. 7Box plots for the histomorphological quantities calculated from the fsOR-PAE images. Five images were analyzed for each subject. (a) Microvessel density and (b) total microvascular area. EC A32, the ectocervix of the first patient at 32 weeks of gestation; EC A36, the ectocervix of the first patient at 36 weeks of gestation; EC B36, the ectocervix of the second patient at 36 weeks of gestation; EC S, the ectocervix specimen; SM S, the sublingual mucosa specimen; UB S, the uterine body specimen. *, **.