Literature DB >> 30519795

Surveillance Ultrasound in the Neuro Intensive Care Unit: Time to Deep Vein Thrombosis Diagnosis.

Kristi L Hargrove1,2,3, Colleen A Barthol4,5,6, Stefan Allen5,6, Crystal Franco-Martinez4,5,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
OBJECTIVES: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) are complications of hospitalization leading to increased morbidity and mortality. Routine surveillance ultrasound has become common practice in some intensive care units (ICU) to detect DVT early and initiate anticoagulation, preventing complications. However, initiating anticoagulants for asymptomatic DVT treatment may increase risk of hemorrhage. The objective of this study was to investigate the value of routine surveillance ultrasound in early DVT diagnosis in Neuro ICU patients.
METHODS: This is a retrospective review of patients diagnosed with DVT during admission to the Neuro ICU at University Hospital from January 1, 2012, through December 31, 2017. Patients were identified through International Classification of Diseases 9th and 10th Revision codes for DVT and PE, screened for inclusion criteria, and then classified as surveillance group or symptom-driven group based on intervention received. Primary outcome was time to DVT diagnosis. Secondary outcome included clinically significant hemorrhage identified by anticoagulation treatment discontinuation for suspected hemorrhage or new or expanding hemorrhage on head computerized tomography (CT).
RESULTS: A total of 116 patients were identified, with 50 included: 27 were classified as surveillance and 23 as symptom-driven. Seven patients (surveillance = 3 and symptom-driven = 4) were diagnosed with only PE and were excluded from primary outcome. Median time to DVT diagnosis was similar at 148 h for surveillance versus 172 h for symptom driven (p = 0.2). There was no difference in treatment discontinuation rates (surveillance 21% vs symptom 31%; p = 0.4). Of the 27 patients with follow-up head CT, two in the surveillance group and two in the symptom-driven group showed a new or expanding hemorrhage.
CONCLUSION: Routine surveillance ultrasound did not lead to significantly earlier DVT diagnosis. Hemorrhagic events were not different between groups. Utility of surveillance ultrasound in this population should be evaluated in large, prospective trials before routine use can be recommended.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anticoagulation; Hemorrhage; Intensive care units; Ultrasonography; Venous thromboembolism

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30519795     DOI: 10.1007/s12028-018-0652-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurocrit Care        ISSN: 1541-6933            Impact factor:   3.210


  8 in total

1.  Safety of Chemical DVT Prophylaxis in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury with Invasive Monitoring Devices.

Authors:  Bradley A Dengler; Paolo Mendez-Gomez; Amanda Chavez; Lacey Avila; Joel Michalek; Brian Hernandez; Ramesh Grandhi; Ali Seifi
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.210

2.  Rate of lower-extremity ultrasonography in trauma patients is associated with rate of deep venous thrombosis but not pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Zachary C Dietch; Brandy L Edwards; Matthew Thames; Puja M Shah; Michael D Williams; Robert G Sawyer
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 3.982

3.  Enoxaparin treatment in high-risk trauma patients limits the utility of surveillance venous duplex scanning.

Authors:  T H Schwarcz; R C Quick; D J Minion; P A Kearney; C J Kwolek; E D Endean
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.268

4.  An analysis of deep vein thrombosis in 1277 consecutive neurosurgical patients undergoing routine weekly ultrasonography.

Authors:  Akil P Patel; Michael T Koltz; Charles A Sansur; Mangla Gulati; D Kojo Hamilton
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  Prevention of pulmonary embolism by combined modalities of thromboprophylaxis and intensive surveillance protocol.

Authors:  Mukesh Misra; Ben Roitberg; Koji Ebersole; Fady T Charbel
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.654

6.  The value of lower-extremity duplex surveillance to detect deep vein thrombosis in trauma patients.

Authors:  Jesse Bandle; Steven R Shackford; Jessica E Kahl; C Beth Sise; Richard Y Calvo; Meghan C Shackford; Michael J Sise
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.313

Review 7.  Prophylaxis of Venous Thrombosis in Neurocritical Care Patients: An Evidence-Based Guideline: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals from the Neurocritical Care Society.

Authors:  Paul Nyquist; Cynthia Bautista; Draga Jichici; Joseph Burns; Sanjeev Chhangani; Michele DeFilippis; Fernando D Goldenberg; Keri Kim; Xi Liu-DeRyke; William Mack; Kim Meyer
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 8.  Is deep vein thrombosis surveillance warranted in high-risk trauma patients?

Authors:  J J Piotrowski; J J Alexander; C P Brandt; C R McHenry; J P Yuhas; D Jacobs
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.565

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Prognostic Significance of Plasma Insulin Level for Deep Venous Thrombosis in Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in Critical Care.

Authors:  Min Du; Qing-Hong Zhang; Rui Tang; Hai-Yan Liu; Zong-Shu Ji; Zhi Gao; Ying Wang; He-Yang You; Ji-Wei Hao; Min Zhou
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 3.532

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.