Literature DB >> 30518968

X-chromosome meiotic drive in Drosophila simulans: a QTL approach reveals the complex polygenic determinism of Paris drive suppression.

Cécile Courret1, Pierre R Gérard1,2, David Ogereau1, Matthieu Falque2, Laurence Moreau2, Catherine Montchamp-Moreau3.   

Abstract

Meiotic drivers are selfish genetic elements that promote their own transmission into the gametes, which results in intragenomic conflicts. In the Paris sex-ratio system of Drosophila simulans, drivers located on the X chromosome prevent the segregation of the heterochromatic Y chromosome during meiosis II, and hence the production of Y-bearing sperm. The resulting sex-ratio bias strongly impacts population dynamics and evolution. Natural selection, which tends to restore an equal sex ratio, favors the emergence of resistant Y chromosomes and autosomal suppressors. This is the case in the Paris sex-ratio system where the drivers became cryptic in most of the natural populations of D. simulans. Here, we used a quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping approach based on the analysis of 152 highly recombinant inbred lines (RILs) to investigate the genetic determinism of autosomal suppression. The RILs were derived from an advanced intercross between two parental lines, one showing complete autosomal suppression while the other one was sensitive to drive. The confrontation of RIL autosomes with a reference XSR chromosome allowed us to identify two QTLs on chromosome 2 and three on chromosome 3, with strong epistatic interactions. Our findings highlight the multiplicity of actors involved in this intragenomic battle over the sex ratio.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30518968      PMCID: PMC6781156          DOI: 10.1038/s41437-018-0163-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  10 in total

1.  Unstable angina--when is it preinfarction?

Authors:  A J Merrill
Journal:  J Med Assoc Ga       Date:  1975-11

2.  The Genetic Systems Modifying Meiotic Drive in Drosophila Paramelanica.

Authors:  H D Stalker
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1961-02       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Causes of sex ratio bias may account for unisexual sterility in hybrids: a new explanation of Haldane's rule and related phenomena.

Authors:  L D Hurst; A Pomiankowski
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Sex-ratio meiotic drive in Drosophila simulans is related to equational nondisjunction of the Y chromosome.

Authors:  M Cazemajor; D Joly; C Montchamp-Moreau
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Natural selection and Y-linked polymorphism.

Authors:  A G Clark
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Suppressor Systems of Segregation Distorter (SD) Chromosomes in Natural Populations of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER.

Authors:  Y Hiraizumi; A M Thomas
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Experimental Population Genetics of Meiotic Drive Systems II. Accumulation of Genetic Modifiers of Segregation Distorter (SD) in Laboratory Populations.

Authors:  T W Lyttle
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Sex-ratio drive in Drosophila simulans: variation in segregation ratio of X chromosomes from a natural population.

Authors:  Catherine Montchamp-Moreau; Michel Cazemajor
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  The sex-ratio trait in Drosophila simulans: genetic analysis of distortion and suppression.

Authors:  M Cazemajor; C Landré; C Montchamp-Moreau
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Differences in crossover frequency and distribution among three sibling species of Drosophila.

Authors:  J R True; J M Mercer; C C Laurie
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.562

  10 in total
  5 in total

1.  The wtf meiotic driver gene family has unexpectedly persisted for over 100 million years.

Authors:  Mickaël De Carvalho; Guo-Song Jia; Ananya Nidamangala Srinivasa; R Blake Billmyre; Yan-Hui Xu; Jeffrey J Lange; Ibrahim M Sabbarini; Li-Lin Du; Sarah E Zanders
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-10-13       Impact factor: 8.713

2.  The fate of a suppressed X-linked meiotic driver: experimental evolution in Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  Héloïse Bastide; David Ogereau; Catherine Montchamp-Moreau; Pierre R Gérard
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 4.620

Review 3.  Resistance to natural and synthetic gene drive systems.

Authors:  Tom A R Price; Nikolai Windbichler; Robert L Unckless; Andreas Sutter; Jan-Niklas Runge; Perran A Ross; Andrew Pomiankowski; Nicole L Nuckolls; Catherine Montchamp-Moreau; Nicole Mideo; Oliver Y Martin; Andri Manser; Mathieu Legros; Amanda M Larracuente; Luke Holman; John Godwin; Neil Gemmell; Cécile Courret; Anna Buchman; Luke G Barrett; Anna K Lindholm
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 2.411

4.  Genome Dominance in Allium Hybrids (A. cepa × A. roylei).

Authors:  David Kopecký; Olga Scholten; Joanna Majka; Karin Burger-Meijer; Martin Duchoslav; Jan Bartoš
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 5.  Hybrid Sterility, Genetic Conflict and Complex Speciation: Lessons From the Drosophila simulans Clade Species.

Authors:  Daven C Presgraves; Colin D Meiklejohn
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 4.599

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.