| Literature DB >> 30517206 |
Frans Everson1, Amanda Genis1, Temitope Ogundipe1, Patrick De Boever2,3, Nandu Goswami4, Amanda Lochner1, Dee Blackhurst5, Hans Strijdom1.
Abstract
HIV-infection, certain antiretroviral drug classes, especially protease inhibitors (PI), and obesity are associated with increased ischaemic heart disease (IHD) risk. However, the effect of PI-free fixed dose combination (FDC) antiretroviral therapy (ART) on hearts exposed to ischaemia-reperfusion injury (I/R) is unknown, particularly in obesity. This is becoming relevant as World Health Organisation guidelines recommend a FDC ART containing (non-) nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (tenofovir (TDF), emtricitabine (FTC) and efavirenz (EFV)) as first-line HIV treatment. Additionally, obesity rates are rising in HIV-infected populations, not only in ART-experienced individuals, but also at the time of ART initiation, which may further increase the risk of IHD. Therefore, we investigated the effects of PI-free FDC ART in myocardial I/R-exposed hearts from obese rats. Obesity was induced in male wistar rats via a 16-week high calorie diet. At week 10, treatment with a FDC ART drug containing TDF/FTC/EFV was initiated. Biometric and metabolic parameters, as well as myocardial functional recovery and infract size (IS), and myocardial signalling proteins following I/R were assessed after 16 weeks. Obese rats presented with increased body and intraperitoneal fat mass, elevated triglyceride and TBARS levels, whilst the hearts responded to I/R with impaired functional performance and increased IS. The FDC ART treatment did not alter biometric and metabolic parameters in obese rats. In a novel finding, ART protected obese hearts against I/R as shown by improved functional performance and smaller IS vs. untreated obese hearts. Cardioprotection was underscored by increased myocardial phosphorylated endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) and reduced AMP-kinase levels. In conclusion, these results demonstrate for the first time, that 6-weeks treatment of obese rats with a FDC ART drug specifically containing TDF/FTC/EFV conferred cardioprotection against I/R. The FDC ART-induced cardioprotection was seemingly unrelated to metabolic changes, but rather due to direct cardiac mechanisms including the up-regulation of myocardial eNOS.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30517206 PMCID: PMC6281242 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208537
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 2Weekly TBM (g) of the rats in each experimental group expressed as the mean TBM / group during the 16-week feeding programme.
Control, n = 28; HCD, n = 26; Control+ART, n = 27; HCD+ART, n = 32. ap < 0.05 HCD vs. Control bp < 0.05 HCD+ART vs. Control+ART. Data analysed by 2-way ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni multiple comparison.
Effects of HCD and ART on biometric, metabolic and oxidative stress parameters.
| Control | HCD | Control+ART | HCD+ART | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 397.4 ± 10.53 | 436.6 ± 10.68 | 400.4 ± 9.24 | 440.7 ± 11.66 | |
| 3.61 ± 0.24 | 5.83 ± 0.29 | 3.09 ± 0.25 | 5.91 ± 0.34 | |
| 3.13 ± 0.06 | 2.93 ± 0.06 | 3.31 ± 0.08 | 3.25 ± 0.09 | |
| 0.40 ± 0.01 | 0.39 ± 0.01 | 0.40 ± 0.02 | 0.39 ± 0.01 | |
| 6.67 ± 0.55 | 5.82 ± 0.38 | 5.92 ± 0.57 | 6.88 ± 0.70 | |
| 1.18 ± 0.16 | 1.11 ± 0.07 | 1.56 ± 0.14 | 1.07 ± 0.07 | |
| 0.65 ± 0.05 | 0.73 ± 0.05 | 0.58 ± 0.05 | 0.65 ± 0.08 | |
| 0.20 ± 0.04 | 0.37 ± 0.06 | 0.22 ± 0.02 | 0.30 ± 0.02 | |
| 119.5 ± 4.74 | 136.0 ± 7.76 | 133.6 ± 15.48 | 117.9 ± 2.71 | |
| 20.01 ± 0.71 | 23.05 ± 0.90 | 24.63 ± 1.15 | 22.35 ± 2.38 |
ap < 0.05 vs. Control
bp < 0.05 vs. Control+ART
cp < 0.05 vs. HCD. Data analysed by 1-way ANOVA (followed by Bonferroni multiple comparison) or student’s t-test.
Functional performance of the hearts pre- and post-global and regional I/R.
| Control | HCD | Control+ART | HCD+ART | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 105.13 ± 1.57 | 100.79 ± 2.40 | 101.72 ± 1.69 | 99.15 ± 2.03 | ||||
| 42.09 ± 1.51 | 41.25 ± 1.70 | 42.36 ± 1.87 | 38.46 ± 1.57 | ||||
| 56.22 ± 1.84 | 55.21 ± 2.00 | 57.91 ± 1.81 | 54.55 ± 2.41 | ||||
| 13.24 ± 0.52 | 12.35 ± 0.43 | 13.25 ± 0.53 | 12.24 ± 0.61 | ||||
| 83.32 ± 16.79 | 30.20 ± 19.40 | 86.00 ± 8.37 | 66.83 ± 16.79 | ||||
| 16.58 ± 5.34 | 2.10 ± 2.10 | 14.50 ± 5.85 | 7.17 ± 4.83 | ||||
| 27.33 ± 7.00 | 6.60 ± 4.21 | 30.25 ± 9.84 | 17.92 ± 6.10 | ||||
| 6.08 ± 1.58 | 0.94 ± 0.94 | 6.37 ± 2.28 | 3.56 ± 1.41 | ||||
| 72.10 ± 12.11 | 63.43 ± 13.62 | 85.83 ± 3.98 | 77.00 ± 12.99 | ||||
| 6.20 ± 2.86 | 0.57 ± 0.57 | 9.17 ± 2.02 | 6.14 ± 3.00 | ||||
| 14.60 ± 4.58 | 9.79 ± 0.71 | 26.25 ± 2.81 | 18.50 ± 4.38 | ||||
| 2.91 ± 0.99 | 1.40 ± 0.30 | 4.82 ± 0.49 | 3.47 ± 1.02 | ||||
| 5/6 (83%) | 1/5 (20%) | 3/4 (75%) | 2/6 (33%) | ||||
| 5/10 (50%) | 1/7 (14%) | 5/6 (83%) | 4/7 (57%) | ||||
Pre- vs. Post-I/R
ap < 0.05 vs. Control Post-Regional I/R
bp < 0.05 vs. HCD Post-Global and Regional /R
cp < 0.05 vs. HCD+ART Post-Global I/R
dp < 0.05 vs. Control Post-Global and Regional I/R
ep < 0.05 vs. Control+ART Post-Global and Regional I/R
fp < 0.05 vs. HCD+ART Post-Global and Regional I/R
Post-Global I/R:
gp < 0.05 vs. Control
Post-Regional I/R:
hp < 0.05 vs. HCD
ip < 0.05 vs. Control.
Values obtained from each group before ischaemia were not significantly different and were therefore grouped together. Hearts that did not recover during reperfusion were included in post-I/R statistical analysis. Data analysed by 1-way ANOVA (followed by Bonferroni multiple comparison) or student’s t-test.