| Literature DB >> 30517173 |
Jibin Zhang1, Carl J Schmidt2, Susan J Lamont1.
Abstract
Modern fast-growing broilers are susceptible to cardiac dysfunctions because their relatively small hearts cannot adequately meet the increased need of pumping blood through a large body mass. To improve cardiac health in broilers through breeding, we need to identify the genes and pathways that contribute to imbalanced cardiac development and occurrence of heart dysfunction. Two broiler lines-Ross 708 and Illinois-were included in this study as models of modern fast-growing and heritage slow-growing broilers, respectively. The left ventricular transcriptome were compared between the two broiler lines at day 6 and 21 post hatch through RNA-seq analysis to identify genes and pathways regulating compromised cardiac development in modern broilers. Number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs, p<0.05) between the two broiler lines increased from 321 at day 6 to 819 at day 21. As the birds grew, Ross broilers showed more DEGs (n = 1879) than Illinois broilers (n = 1117). Both broilers showed significant change of muscle related genes and immune genes, but Ross broilers showed remarkable change of expression of several lipid transporter genes including APOA4, APOB, APOH, FABP4 and RBP7. Ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA) suggested that increased cell apoptosis and inhibited cell cycle due to increased lipid accumulation, oxidative stress and endoplasmic reticulum stress may be related to the increased cardiac dysfunctions in fast-growing broilers. Cell cycle regulatory pathways like "Mitotic Roles of Polo-like Kinases" are ranked as the top changed pathways related to the cell apoptosis. These findings provide further insight into the cardiac dysfunction in modern broilers and also potential targets for improvement of their cardiac health through breeding.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30517173 PMCID: PMC6281182 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207715
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Ross broilers showed faster body growth but relatively slower cardiac development than Illinois broilers.
(A) Body weight of two broiler lines at day 6 and 21. (B) Normalized heart weight of two broiler lines at day 6 and 21. Each bar represents Mean±SEM. Different letters (a-d) represent significant differences among different groups.
Fig 2Principal component analysis showed distinct clustering of samples in different groups in different colors.
Principal component 1 (PC1) in horizontal axis and PC2 in vertical axis explain 37% and 15% of variation in variance-stabilized normalized counts, respectively.
Fig 3Number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) with false discovery rate (FDR) <0.05 in different contrasts.
(A) Nubmer of DEGs between two broiler lines at day 6 and day 21. (B) Number of DEGs between between day 21 and day 6 within each line. Upregulated and downregulated DEGs are presented in red and blue color. DE genes within different range of Log2 fold change were represented in different intensity of the color.
Top unique DEGs with |Log2(Fold Change)|>3 for each comparison.
| Contrast | Gene ID | Gene Name | Log2(Fold Change) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ross vs. Illinois at day 6 | ENSGALG00000029606 | -4.48571 | |
| ENSGALG00000027269 | 5.199285 | ||
| ENSGALG00000007109 | 4.385074 | ||
| ENSGALG00000016491 | 3.238129 | ||
| Ross vs. Illinois at day 21 | ENSGALG00000030025 | 3.747346 | |
| ENSGALG00000043106 | 3.673439 | ||
| ENSGALG00000013568 | 3.62707 | ||
| ENSGALG00000028273 | 3.448613 | ||
| ENSGALG00000002637 | 3.36089 | ||
| Day21 vs. Day6 in Ross broilers | ENSGALG00000016491 | -5.24655 | |
| ENSGALG00000035219 | -5.19727 | ||
| ENSGALG00000046217 | -5.08558 | ||
| ENSGALG00000004129 | -4.65607 | ||
| ENSGALG00000033376 | -4.63739 | ||
| ENSGALG00000008601 | -4.56889 | ||
| ENSGALG00000019845 | -4.51473 | ||
| ENSGALG00000007109 | -4.23166 | ||
| ENSGALG00000009266 | -4.1972 | ||
| ENSGALG00000011612 | -4.11616 | ||
| ENSGALG00000015143 | -4.04382 | ||
| ENSGALG00000023435 | -3.9296 | ||
| ENSGALG00000030002 | -3.40364 | ||
| ENSGALG00000022815 | -3.36562 | ||
| ENSGALG00000030025 | 3.534243 | ||
| ENSGALG00000002637 | 3.45057 | ||
| Day21 vs. Day6 in Illinois broilers | ENSGALG00000029606 | -4.0246 | |
| ENSGALG00000005226 | -3.01199 |
Fig 4Linear regression fitted between Log2 fold change (FC) in RNA-seq analysis and -ΔΔCt in Biomark qPCR assay of 39 selected DEGs.
Different contrasts were marked in different colors. Different groups in the comparisons were labeled as Line_Age (RS = Ross; IL = Illinois; D6 = day 6; D21 = day 21). Pearson correlation coefficient is labeled as “r”. Log2FC in Biomark assay equals -ΔΔCt for each comparison. Average Ct value for each group is the mean of samples in that group. Geometric mean expression of three housekeeping genes including GAPDH, H6PD and RPS13 was used for normalization of Ct values.
Top significant pathways (p<0.05) predicted by IPA for contrasts between lines or ages.
| Contrasts | Pathways | Important DEGs contributing to prediction | Ratios |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ross vs. Illinois at day 6 | IL-12 Signaling and Production in Macrophages | 9/146 | |
| Th1 and Th2 Activation Pathway | 10/185 | ||
| Antigen Presentation Pathway | 5/38 | ||
| Th1 Pathway | 8/135 | ||
| Production of Nitric Oxide and Reactive Oxygen Species in Macrophages | 9/194 | ||
| Ross vs. Illinois at day 21 | Unfolded Protein Response | 12/55 | |
| Oxidative Phosphorylation | 16/109 | ||
| Cell Cycle Control of Chromosomal Replication | 10/56 | ||
| Mitochondrial Dysfunction | 17/171 | ||
| Protein Ubiquitination Pathway | 20/265 | ||
| Day 21 vs. Day 6 in Ross | Role of BRCA1 in DNA Damage Response | 28/80 | |
| Superpathway of Cholesterol Biosynthesis | 17/28 | ||
| Cell Cycle Control of Chromosomal Replication | 23/56 | ||
| Mitotic Roles of Polo-Like Kinase | 20/66 | ||
| Role of CHK Proteins in Cell Cycle Checkpoint Control | 18/57 | ||
| Day 21 vs. Day 6 in Illinois | EIF2 Signaling | 43/221 | |
| Th1 and Th2 Activation Pathway | 24/185 | ||
| Superpathway of Cholesterol Biosynthesis | 10/28 | ||
| Antigen Presentation Pathway | 11/38 | ||
| T Cell Receptor Signaling | 16/109 |
Bold italic and italic font, respectively, indicates higher and lower expression of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in Ross compared to Illinois or at day 21 compared to day 6. Genes within the same family or complex are labeled with the member or subunit names in the brackets. Ratios = (Number of DEGs in a pathways) / (Total number of genes in the pathway).
Fig 5Increased cell apoptosis in Ross broilers and active immune cell development was predicted by IPA.
(A) Top 10 Diseases and Biofunctions predicted for Ross vs. Illinois at day 6 and day 21. (B) Top 10 Diseases and Biofunctions predicted for Day 21 vs. Day 6 in the two lines. Prediction of activation or inhibition of a disease or biofunction is calculated as negative or positive z-score and colored in blue or orange, respectively, in the heat map. The intensity of the color in the heat map based on |z-score| indicates robustness of the prediction. The range of activation z-score in each heat map is shown as a bar with minimum and maximun at two ends.