Literature DB >> 30515982

Wood forming tissue-specific bicistronic expression of PdGA20ox1 and PtrMYB221 improves both the quality and quantity of woody biomass production in a hybrid poplar.

Jin-Seong Cho1, Hyung-Woo Jeon1, Min-Ha Kim1, The K Vo2, Jinsoo Kim2, Eung-Jun Park3, Young-Im Choi3, Hyoshin Lee3, Kyung-Hwan Han4, Jae-Heung Ko1.   

Abstract

With the exponential growth of the human population and industrial developments, research on renewable energy resources is required to alleviate environmental and economic impacts caused by the consumption of fossil fuels. In this study, we present a synthetic biological application of a wood forming tissue-specific bicistronic gene expression system to improve both the quantity and quality of woody biomass to minimize undesirable growth penalties. Our transgenic poplars, designed to express both PdGA20ox1 (a GA20-oxidase from Pinus densiflora producing bioactive gibberellin, GA) and PtrMYB221 (a MYB transcription factor negatively regulating lignin biosynthesis) under the developing xylem (DX) tissue-specific promoter (i.e., DX15::PdGA20ox1-2A-PtrMYB221 poplar), resulted in a 2-fold increase in biomass quantity compared to wild-type (WT), without undesirable growth defects. A similar phenotype was observed in transgenic Arabidopsis plants harboring the same gene constructs. These phenotypic consequences were further verified in the field experiments. Importantly, our transgenic poplars exhibited an improved quality of biomass with reduced lignin content (~16.0 wt%) but increased holocellulose content (~6.6 wt%). Furthermore, the saccharification efficiency of our transgenic poplar increased significantly by up to 8%. Our results demonstrate that the controlled production of both GA and a secondary wall modifying regulator in the same spatio-temporal manner can be utilized as an efficient biotechnological tool for producing the desired multi-purpose woody biomass.
© 2018 The Authors. Plant Biotechnology Journal published by Society for Experimental Biology and The Association of Applied Biologists and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990PdGA20ox1zzm321990; zzm321990PtrMYB221zzm321990; bicistronic gene expression; developing xylem promoter; poplar; synthetic biology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30515982      PMCID: PMC6523601          DOI: 10.1111/pbi.13036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J        ISSN: 1467-7644            Impact factor:   9.803


Introduction

Currently, a tremendous amount of fossil fuels is consumed to cope with the increasing demands of our modern society with exponential growth of population and industrial developments. The resulting environmental and economic impacts are shifting our research interests to various sources of renewable energy such as solar, wind, geothermal, tidal, and biomass (Blunden and Arndt, 2016; Fouquet, 2016). While most alternate energy sources produce electric energy, biomass can be converted into various forms of energy including not only electricity, but also gas and liquid energy, which can be used directly in current internal combustion engines (Albers et al., 2016; Chundawat et al., 2011; López‐Hidalgo et al., 2017; Vanholme et al., 2013). Recently, many studies have been conducted to produce biofuels from woody biomass, which account for more than 90% of the total biomass produced on Earth (Castro et al., 2014; Crawford et al., 2016; Ko et al., 2017; Serapiglia et al., 2013; Vo et al., 2017; Zhu et al., 2010). Populus species can serve as an ideal woody biomass because of their fast growth characteristics for feedstock supply and inherent secondary cell wall characteristics with suitable cellulose to lignin ratios for utilization as a bioethanol crop (Porth and El‐Kassaby, 2015). Plant hormones play an essential role in the growth and development of plants. Among them, gibberellins (GAs) regulate many aspects of plant development, including stem elongation, flowering, and wood formation (Biemelt et al., 2004; Eriksson et al., 2000; Hedden and Thomas, 2012; Kende and Zeevaart, 1997; Kurosawa, 1926; Mauriat and Moritz, 2009; Park et al., 2015). It has been shown that GA 20‐oxidase (GA20ox) plays a key role in bioactive GA biosynthesis in several plant species (Carrera et al., 2000; Coles et al., 1999; Huang et al., 1998; Park et al., 2015; Rieu et al., 2008; Zi et al., 2014). Many studies have shown that overexpression of GA20ox resulted in the increase of stem elongation in Arabidopsis (Coles et al., 1999; Huang et al., 1998), potato (Carrera et al., 2000), hybrid aspen (Eriksson et al., 2000; Mauriat and Moritz, 2009), and cotton (Xiao et al., 2010). However, overproduction of GA by constitutive expression (i.e., using the CaMV 35S promoter) of GA20ox has been accompanied by undesirable pleiotropic side effects on plant growth, including poor rooting, small leaves, and slender stems (Eriksson et al., 2000; Jeon et al., 2016; Mauriat et al., 2014). Previously, we have reported a strategy that employed a production of GA using PdGA20ox1, which encodes GA20ox from Pinus densiflora, through a developing xylem (DX) tissue‐specific promoter (i.e., DX15 promoter; Ko et al., 2012) as an efficient biotechnological tool for producing enhanced plant biomass and reducing unwanted growth penalties (Jeon et al., 2016). For an efficient bioenergy production using woody biomass, it is important to improve both the quantity and quality of wood. Secondary cell walls comprising woody biomass mainly consist of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin (Chundawat et al., 2011; Lee et al., 2011; Vanholme et al., 2013). To produce liquid biofuels (e.g., bioethanol), cellulose and hemicellulose are utilized as fermentable sugars (Chundawat et al., 2011; Vanholme et al., 2013). However, lignins, which are complex polymers of phenolic compounds, contribute to the recalcitrance of the secondary walls to deconstruction because of tight cross‐links with cellulose and hemicellulose fibrils (Carroll and Somerville, 2009; Pauly and Keegstra, 2010; Simmons et al., 2010; Somerville et al., 2010). Therefore, adjusting the amount and ratio of the secondary wall components is very important in enhancing the production and yield of biofuels (Albers et al., 2016; Chundawat et al., 2011; Vanholme et al., 2013). Several MYB transcription factors (TF) have been identified as major regulators of secondary wall formation, and MYB46 plays a pivotal role as a master switch for secondary wall biosynthesis in Arabidopsis (Kim et al., 2013; Ko et al., 2009, 2014; McCarthy et al., 2009). However, some MYB TFs have been reported as inhibitors of lignin biosynthesis (Raes et al., 2003; Zhao and Dixon, 2011); for example, overexpression of eucalyptus EgMYB1, corn ZmMYB31, or switchgrass PvMYB4 decreases lignin content (Fornalé et al., 2006; Legay et al., 2010; Shen et al., 2012; Sonbol et al., 2009). Recently, poplar MYB TFs similar to EgMYB1, such as PtoMYB156 and PdMYB221, were also found to be involved in negative regulation of lignin biosynthesis as well as secondary wall formation (Tang et al., 2015; Yang et al., 2017). A multi‐cistronic gene expression system was successfully utilized in both plants and animals to express two or more transgenes in synchronized coordinated expression under the control of a single promoter (Daniels et al., 2014; Ha et al., 2010; Lee et al., 2012; Mikkelsen et al., 2010; Tian et al., 2013; Trichas et al., 2008; Zhang et al., 2017). This system encodes multiple genes in a single open reading frame, with a short intervening viral 2A sequence, which has self‐processing properties, between two coding sequences (Atkins et al., 2007; Donnelly et al., 2001). The 2A self‐cleaving peptide (2A), identified from foot‐and‐mouth‐disease virus (FMDV), is an oligopeptide (usually 19–22 amino acids) located between two proteins (Ryan et al., 1991). The 2A peptide self‐cleaves to generate two proteins by a translational effect known as ‘stop‐go’ or ‘stop‐carry’ (Atkins et al., 2007; Donnelly et al., 2001; Ryan and Drew, 1994). Because the 2A system has many advantages, it has been widely applied in many areas of research including gene therapy, gene function study, and production of genetically modified organisms (Daniels et al., 2014; Ha et al., 2010; Lee et al., 2012; Mikkelsen et al., 2010; Tian et al., 2013; Trichas et al., 2008; Zhang et al., 2017). In this study, we took advantage of the viral 2A system in a synthetic biological approach to express two genes in developing xylem tissue specifically to improve woody biomass. Our results showed that the controlled production of GA and a transcriptional regulator for secondary wall biosynthesis through a DX15 promoter successfully produced improved woody biomass both quantitatively and qualitatively without any growth penalties.

Results

Strategy to generate transgenic plants expressing both PdGA20ox1 and PtrMYB221 in developing xylem tissue

To improve both quantity and quality of woody biomass while minimizing undesirable growth penalties, we applied two biotechnological tools in this study: One is the ‘viral 2A self‐cleaving peptide’ to express two genes (PdGA20ox1 and PtrMYB221) bicistronically (Atkins et al., 2007; Donnelly et al., 2001; Mikkelsen et al., 2010; Ryan and Drew, 1994) (Figure S1); the other is the ‘DX15 promoter’ for DX tissue‐specific expression (Ko et al., 2012). PdGA20ox1, a GA20ox1 from P. densiflora, was used to increase biomass ‘quantity’ as we reported (Jeon et al., 2016; Park et al., 2015), while PtrMYB221, a MYB TF from Populus trichocarpa, was used to improve biomass ‘quality’ because PtrMYB221 is the closest homolog of EgMYB1 (Figure S2), a well‐known negative regulator of lignin biosynthesis (Legay et al., 2010). The ‘quality’ in this study indicates the changes of wood property (e.g., reduction of lignin contents) to improve saccharification efficiency. Thus, this system allows the expression of two genes that affect both the quantity and quality of woody biomass production in the same spatio‐temporal manner in developing xylem tissue (Figure S1). Using this system, we generated both transgenic Arabidopsis and poplar plants, designated DX15::PdGA20ox1‐2A‐PtrMYB221 plants.

Transgenic Arabidopsis plants showed increased biomass formation

For a proof‐of‐concept experiment, we performed phenotypic analysis of transgenic Arabidopsis plants (i.e., DX15::PdGA20ox1‐2A‐PtrMYB221) using five selected T3 homozygous lines (Figure 1). We observed significant increases of biomass in 43‐day‐old soil‐grown transgenic Arabidopsis plants compared to WT plants (Figure 1), which is likely caused by an elevated endogenous GA level in DX tissue and is consistent with our previous observation of transgenic Arabidopsis with a DX15::PdGA20ox1 construct (Jeon et al., 2016). Compared to WT plants, the transgenic Arabidopsis had a much taller stem height by up to 2‐fold, and the fresh weights of the stem increased by up to 1.88‐fold (Figure 1a,b). These phenotypic consequences of transgenic Arabidopsis are in line with the expression level of the introduced gene, a PdGA20ox1‐2A‐PtrMYB221 transcripts (Figure 1c).
Figure 1

Enhanced growth of transgenic Arabidopsis plants. Growth performances were analyzed using 43‐day‐old soil‐grown plants. (a) Overall growth phenotypes of transgenic Arabidopsis plants (i.e., DX15::PdGA20ox1‐2A‐PtrMYB221) were compared to those of wild‐type (WT) plants. Five independent T3 homozygote transgenic lines (e.g., 1‐12, 2‐3, 3‐3, 4‐6, and 5‐1) are shown. (b) Biomass increases of transgenic Arabidopsis plants compared to WT plants. Both stem height (upper) and stem fresh weight (lower) were measured. Error bars indicate SE (n = 6) (***P‐value < 0.001, ****P‐value <0.0001, unpaired t‐test). (c) Expression of PdGA20ox1‐2A‐PtrMYB221 transcripts in transgenic Arabidopsis plants. Semi‐quantitative RT‐PCR (26 cycles) was performed using cDNA templates generated from stem total RNA. PdGA20ox1 forward primer (#5) and PtrMYB221 reverse primer (#6) were used to amplify the Pd transcripts (Table S1). The Actin2 gene was used as a loading control.

Enhanced growth of transgenic Arabidopsis plants. Growth performances were analyzed using 43‐day‐old soil‐grown plants. (a) Overall growth phenotypes of transgenic Arabidopsis plants (i.e., DX15::PdGA20ox1‐2A‐PtrMYB221) were compared to those of wild‐type (WT) plants. Five independent T3 homozygote transgenic lines (e.g., 1‐12, 2‐3, 3‐3, 4‐6, and 5‐1) are shown. (b) Biomass increases of transgenic Arabidopsis plants compared to WT plants. Both stem height (upper) and stem fresh weight (lower) were measured. Error bars indicate SE (n = 6) (***P‐value < 0.001, ****P‐value <0.0001, unpaired t‐test). (c) Expression of PdGA20ox1‐2A‐PtrMYB221 transcripts in transgenic Arabidopsis plants. Semi‐quantitative RT‐PCR (26 cycles) was performed using cDNA templates generated from stem total RNA. PdGA20ox1 forward primer (#5) and PtrMYB221 reverse primer (#6) were used to amplify the Pd transcripts (Table S1). The Actin2 gene was used as a loading control.

Transgenic poplar trees resulted in an increase of biomass

As expected from our previous results (Jeon et al., 2016; Park et al., 2015), DX15::PdGA20ox1‐2A‐PtrMYB221 transgenic poplars showed enhanced biomass production comparable to that of 35S::PdGA20ox1 poplars (Figure 2). We analyzed the overall growth of young plants grown in a greenhouse for 60 days. The height of the stems was increased by up to 2.39 and 1.85‐fold in 35S::PdGA20ox1 and DX15::PdGA20ox1‐2A‐PtrMYB221, respectively, compared to WT (Figure 2b). In addition, stem fresh weights of both transgenic poplars were increased by up to 2.29‐fold compared to WT (Figure 2b).
Figure 2

Biomass increases of transgenic poplar plants grown in a greenhouse. Growth performances were analyzed using 60‐day‐old soil‐grown poplar plants. (a) Overall growth phenotype of transgenic poplar plants (DX15::PdGA20ox1‐2A‐PtrMYB221) compared to wild‐type (WT) and 35S::PdGA20ox1 poplar plants. Numbers in each transgenic poplar plant indicate independent lines. (b) Biomass increases of transgenic poplar plants (DX15::PdGA20ox1‐2A‐PtrMYB221) compared to WT and 35S::PdGA20ox1 poplar plants. Stem height (top), stem diameter (middle), and stem fresh weight (bottom) were measured from representative lines of each transgenic poplar plant. Error bars indicate SD (n = 5) (*P‐value < 0.1, **P‐value < 0.01, ***P‐value < 0.001, ****P‐value <0.0001, unpaired t‐test).

Biomass increases of transgenic poplar plants grown in a greenhouse. Growth performances were analyzed using 60‐day‐old soil‐grown poplar plants. (a) Overall growth phenotype of transgenic poplar plants (DX15::PdGA20ox1‐2A‐PtrMYB221) compared to wild‐type (WT) and 35S::PdGA20ox1 poplar plants. Numbers in each transgenic poplar plant indicate independent lines. (b) Biomass increases of transgenic poplar plants (DX15::PdGA20ox1‐2A‐PtrMYB221) compared to WT and 35S::PdGA20ox1 poplar plants. Stem height (top), stem diameter (middle), and stem fresh weight (bottom) were measured from representative lines of each transgenic poplar plant. Error bars indicate SD (n = 5) (*P‐value < 0.1, **P‐value < 0.01, ***P‐value < 0.001, ****P‐value <0.0001, unpaired t‐test). Although the DX‐specific expression capacity of the DX15 promoter has been confirmed (Ko et al., 2012), we verified stem‐specific expression of PdGA20ox1 in DX15::PdGA20ox1‐2A‐PtrMYB221 transgenic poplar plants by both semi‐quantitative RT‐PCR and quantitative RT‐PCR (Figure S3). While the PdGA20ox1 gene in 35S::PdGA20ox1 transgenic poplar was strongly expressed in both stems and leaves, the PdGA20ox1 gene in DX15::PdGA20ox1‐2A‐PtrMYB221 transgenic poplar was specifically expressed in stem tissue only, although the overall expression level was lower than that of 35S::PdGA20ox1 transgenic poplar (Figure S2). To assess biomass formation in field conditions, we measured the height and stem diameter of transgenic poplars grown for 3 months (i.e., active growing season from spring to summer) in a living modified organism (LMO) site (Figure 3). Height was increased up to 1.53‐fold and 1.39‐fold in 35S::PdGA20ox1 and DX15::PdGA20ox1‐2A‐PtrMYB221 poplars, respectively, compared to WT. Interestingly, stem diameter was increased by up to 1.25‐fold in DX15::PdGA20ox1‐2A‐PtrMYB221 poplars, while no significant differences were found in 35S::PdGA20ox1 poplars compared to WT (Figure 3a). After 6 months of growth, the stem diameter was greater in the DX15::PdGA20ox1‐2A‐PtrMYB221 poplars compared to both WT and 35S::PdGA20ox1 plants (Figure 3b).
Figure 3

Biomass increases of transgenic poplar plants grown in an LMO field. (a) Growth performances were analyzed using poplar plants grown in an LMO field for 3 months (from spring to summer). Stem height (upper) and stem diameter (lower) were measured in transgenic poplar plants (DX15::PdGA20ox1‐2A‐PtrMYB221) compared to wild‐type (WT) and 35S::PdGA20ox1 poplar plants. Error bars indicate SD (n = 5) (*P‐value <0.1, ****P‐value <0.0001, unpaired t‐test). (b) Stem diameter growth of DX15::PdGA20ox1‐2A‐PtrMYB221 transgenic poplar plant (#2) compared to 35S::PdGA20ox1 (#32) and WT plants grown for 6 months in an LMO field. Representative pictures are shown. Scale bars indicate 1 cm.

Biomass increases of transgenic poplar plants grown in an LMO field. (a) Growth performances were analyzed using poplar plants grown in an LMO field for 3 months (from spring to summer). Stem height (upper) and stem diameter (lower) were measured in transgenic poplar plants (DX15::PdGA20ox1‐2A‐PtrMYB221) compared to wild‐type (WT) and 35S::PdGA20ox1 poplar plants. Error bars indicate SD (n = 5) (*P‐value <0.1, ****P‐value <0.0001, unpaired t‐test). (b) Stem diameter growth of DX15::PdGA20ox1‐2A‐PtrMYB221 transgenic poplar plant (#2) compared to 35S::PdGA20ox1 (#32) and WT plants grown for 6 months in an LMO field. Representative pictures are shown. Scale bars indicate 1 cm.

Undesirable growth penalties caused by GA overproduction were minimized in the DX15::PdGA20ox1‐2A‐PtrMYB221 transgenic poplar

Jeon et al. (2016) reported a successful utilization of the DX15 promoter for controlled GA production to reduce undesirable growth penalties (e.g., weak stems, poor root growth, and leaf developments) reported in GA overproducing poplar plants by overexpressing GA20ox (Eriksson et al., 2000; Mauriat et al., 2014). Consistent with our previous results (Jeon et al., 2016), 35S::PdGA20ox1 poplars (lines 22 and 32) grown for 60 days in a greenhouse exhibit a reduction in leaf area of approximately 38%–40%, and leaves are a pale green color compared to the WT (Figure 4a). However, the leaf growth of DX15::PdGA20ox1‐2A‐PtrMYB221 poplars is quite comparable to that of WT (Figure 4a). Root growth, critical for sustainable growth of plants, was severely affected in 35S::PdGA20ox1 poplars, as reported previously. Figure 4b shows that 35S::PdGA20ox1 lines had a reduction of root fresh weight of around 73%–78% compared to WT. However, DX15::PdGA20ox1‐2A‐PtrMYB221 lines showed similar or better growth of roots than did the WT (Figure 4b).
Figure 4

Undesirable growth penalties were minimized in the DX15::PdGA20ox1‐2A‐PtrMYB221 transgenic poplar. (a and b) Leaf and root growths were analyzed using 60‐day‐old greenhouse‐grown poplar plants. Leaf area is the average of three of the 10th–12th leaves from the top. Representative leaf pictures are shown (top of (a)). Root fresh weights were measured for root growth (b). (c) Leaf growth (middle) and chlorophyll content (bottom) were analyzed using poplar plants grown in the LMO field for 3 months (from spring to summer). Both leaf area and chlorophyll content are the average value of three leaves, which are the largest of the 10th–18th leaves from the top. Representative leaf pictures are shown (top). Error bars indicate SE (n = 5) (***P‐value < 0.001, ****P‐value <0.0001, unpaired t‐test).

Undesirable growth penalties were minimized in the DX15::PdGA20ox1‐2A‐PtrMYB221 transgenic poplar. (a and b) Leaf and root growths were analyzed using 60‐day‐old greenhouse‐grown poplar plants. Leaf area is the average of three of the 10th–12th leaves from the top. Representative leaf pictures are shown (top of (a)). Root fresh weights were measured for root growth (b). (c) Leaf growth (middle) and chlorophyll content (bottom) were analyzed using poplar plants grown in the LMO field for 3 months (from spring to summer). Both leaf area and chlorophyll content are the average value of three leaves, which are the largest of the 10th–18th leaves from the top. Representative leaf pictures are shown (top). Error bars indicate SE (n = 5) (***P‐value < 0.001, ****P‐value <0.0001, unpaired t‐test). In LMO field conditions, leaf growth of 35S::PdGA20ox1 poplars was severely reduced by up to 65%, whereas that of DX15::PdGA20ox1‐2A‐PtrMYB221 line 2 showed no changes compared to WT (Figure 4c). The chlorophyll content of leaves was measured to estimate photosynthetic activity. Although there was a significant reduction of chlorophyll content in the leaves of 35S::PdGA20ox1 poplars, DX15::PdGA20ox1‐2A‐PtrMYB221 lines exhibited no differences compared to WT (Figure 4c). Taken together, these results indicate that the preferential expression of wood forming tissue of both PdGA20ox1 and PtrMYB221 substantially minimized undesirable phenotypes compared to the 35S::PdGA20ox1 poplar.

Transgenic poplars produce an improved quality of woody biomass

We examined the stem tissues of the DX15::PdGA20ox1‐2A‐PtrMYB221 transgenic poplars to observe the quantitative and qualitative changes of wood formation. A stem cross section at the 15th internode from the 60‐day, greenhouse‐grown poplars showed that, compared to WT, all the transgenic lines exhibited a substantial increase in secondary xylem differentiation with gelatinous fiber formation (Figure 5a), which is consistent with our previous transgenic poplars expressing either 35S::PdGA20ox1 or DX15::PdGA20ox1 (Jeon et al., 2016; Park et al., 2015). Very interestingly, our DX15::PdGA20ox1‐2A‐PtrMYB221 poplars showed an irregular xylem phenotype that has never been observed (Figure 5a). This result suggests that DX15::PdGA20ox1‐2A‐PtrMYB221 poplars have reduced secondary wall thickening in the xylem, most likely caused by reduced lignin content through PtrMYB221 function. This phenotype was consistent to the transgenic Arabidopsis plants in our proof‐of‐concept experiment (Figure 1). Among five selected T3 homozygous lines, three lines (e.g., #2‐3, #3‐3, #4‐6) showed clear irregular xylem phenotype (Figure S4) and these phenotypic consequences seem to closely associate with the expression level of the introduced PdGA20ox1‐2A‐PtrMYB221 transcripts (Figure 1 and Figure S4).
Figure 5

Transgenic poplars produce improved quality of woody biomass. (a) Enhanced wood formation but reduced secondary wall thickening in DX15::PdGA20ox1‐2A‐PtrMYB221 transgenic poplars. The 15th internodes of the main stems from 60‐day‐old soil‐grown poplar plants were used for histological analysis. Transverse stem sections were stained with toluidine blue O. Lower panels are the enlarged view of upper panels. Red arrowheads indicate irregular xylem, and yellow arrowheads point to gelatinous fiber formation. Scale bars indicate 100 μm. (b) Expression of genes involved in the lignin biosynthetic pathway. PtrPAL1 (phenylalanine ammonia‐lyase1, Potri.006G126800.1), Ptr4CL2 (4‐coumaroyl‐CoA ligase2, Potri.019G049500.2), PtrCOMT2 (caffeic acid 3‐O‐methyltransferase2, Potri.012G006400.2), PtrCCoAOMT1 (caffeoyl‐CoA 3‐O‐methyltransferase1, Potri.001G304800.1), PtrC4H1 (cinnamate 4‐hydroxylase1, Potri.013G157900.1), and PtrF5H1 (ferulate 5‐hydroxylase1, Potri.007G016400.1). Quantitative real‐time PCRs were performed using first‐strand cDNA synthesized from total RNAs extracted from stem tissues of 60‐day‐old WT plants and the #2 line of the DX15::PdGA20ox1‐2A‐PtrMYB221 poplar. Relative transcript levels were determined using the PtrACTIN genes as a quantitative control. Error bars indicate SD of three independent experiments.

Transgenic poplars produce improved quality of woody biomass. (a) Enhanced wood formation but reduced secondary wall thickening in DX15::PdGA20ox1‐2A‐PtrMYB221 transgenic poplars. The 15th internodes of the main stems from 60‐day‐old soil‐grown poplar plants were used for histological analysis. Transverse stem sections were stained with toluidine blue O. Lower panels are the enlarged view of upper panels. Red arrowheads indicate irregular xylem, and yellow arrowheads point to gelatinous fiber formation. Scale bars indicate 100 μm. (b) Expression of genes involved in the lignin biosynthetic pathway. PtrPAL1 (phenylalanine ammonia‐lyase1, Potri.006G126800.1), Ptr4CL2 (4‐coumaroyl‐CoA ligase2, Potri.019G049500.2), PtrCOMT2 (caffeic acid 3‐O‐methyltransferase2, Potri.012G006400.2), PtrCCoAOMT1 (caffeoyl‐CoA 3‐O‐methyltransferase1, Potri.001G304800.1), PtrC4H1 (cinnamate 4‐hydroxylase1, Potri.013G157900.1), and PtrF5H1 (ferulate 5‐hydroxylase1, Potri.007G016400.1). Quantitative real‐time PCRs were performed using first‐strand cDNA synthesized from total RNAs extracted from stem tissues of 60‐day‐old WT plants and the #2 line of the DX15::PdGA20ox1‐2A‐PtrMYB221 poplar. Relative transcript levels were determined using the PtrACTIN genes as a quantitative control. Error bars indicate SD of three independent experiments. Accordingly, the expression of many of the lignin biosynthetic genes, such as PtrPAL1, Ptr4CL2, PtrCOMT2, PtrCCOAOMT1, PtrC4H1, and PtrF5H1, was significantly reduced (Figure 5b). Indeed, DX15::PdGA20ox1‐2A‐PtrMYB221 poplars have increased cellulose but substantially decreased lignin content (~16 wt%) in wood tissues compared to those of WT (Figure S5), which was reported previously (Vo et al., 2017). Saccharification efficiency of wood materials from LMO field grown poplars was estimated by quantifying the amount of glucose released at different incubation times after hot water or alkali (NaOH) pretreatment (Figure 6). Our results showed that a significant increase in saccharification efficiency was observed in NaOH treated transgenic poplars compared to WT, up to 8% at 24 h (Figure 6). However, no significant changes were found in hot water treatment except after incubation for 48 h. These results suggest that our transgenic poplars have enhanced wood formation but reduced lignin content, which probably confers improved saccharification efficiency.
Figure 6

Increased saccharification efficiency of cell wall materials from transgenic poplar plants. Saccharification efficiency was estimated by analyzing the glucose content produced by cell wall materials of woody stems of poplar plants grown in the LMO field for 3 months (from spring to summer) after water (upper) or NaOH (lower) treatment for the indicated time (see Methods). WT, wild type; TP, transgenic poplar plants (DX15::PdGA20ox1‐2A‐PtrMYB221). Error bars indicate SD (n = 9) (**P‐value < 0.01, ***P‐value <0.001, unpaired t‐test).

Increased saccharification efficiency of cell wall materials from transgenic poplar plants. Saccharification efficiency was estimated by analyzing the glucose content produced by cell wall materials of woody stems of poplar plants grown in the LMO field for 3 months (from spring to summer) after water (upper) or NaOH (lower) treatment for the indicated time (see Methods). WT, wild type; TP, transgenic poplar plants (DX15::PdGA20ox1‐2A‐PtrMYB221). Error bars indicate SD (n = 9) (**P‐value < 0.01, ***P‐value <0.001, unpaired t‐test).

Discussion

Previously, we reported that a GA20ox1 gene from P. densiflora (i.e., PdGA20ox1) and overexpression of PdGA20ox1 in a hybrid poplar resulted in an elevated level of endogenous GA and enhanced stem growth and wood formation (Park et al., 2015). However, transgenic poplars constitutively overexpressing PdGA20ox1 (i.e., 35S::PdGA20ox1 poplar) showed unwanted phenotypes such as poor rooting and small leaves with weak stems, as reported previously (Eriksson et al., 2000; Mauriat et al., 2014). To reduce undesirable phenotypes of the 35S::PdGA20ox1 poplar, we utilized the DX15 promoter and produced DX15::PdGA20ox1 poplars (Jeon et al., 2016). As expected, the biomass production of DX15::PdGA20ox1 poplars was comparable to the 35S::PdGA20ox1 poplar but with significantly reduced growth defects (Jeon et al., 2016). Here, we describe a one‐step advanced strategy aimed at improving both the quantity and quality of woody biomass while minimizing the undesirable growth penalties by expressing PdGA20ox1 and secondary wall modifying TFs in the same spatio‐temporal manner. We tested a PtrMYB221 gene (Potri.004G174400.1) as a secondary wall modifying TF to reduce lignin content in wood tissue. The PtrMYB221 gene is predicted to function as a transcriptional repressor with a DLNLEL motif in the C‐terminal region (Figure S2). DLNLEL is one of the ERF‐associated amphiphilic repression (EAR) motifs that is conserved in transcriptional repressors including EgMYB1, ZmMYB31, and PvMYB4 (Fornalé et al., 2006; Legay et al., 2010; Ohta et al., 2001; Shen et al., 2012; Sonbol et al., 2009). Overexpressing EgMYB1 in transgenic poplar decreases the lignin content, indicating that EgMYB1 acts as the negative regulator of PAL2, C4H2, C3H1, F5H, CCoAOMT1, CCR2, and CAD1 genes (Legay et al., 2010). In addition, the PtrMYB221 gene is orthologous to PdMYB221 from Populus deltoides and PtoMYB156 from Populus tormentosa, which were recently identified as repressors of both phenylpropanoid biosynthesis and secondary cell wall formation in poplar (Tang et al., 2015; Yang et al., 2017). Our DX15::PdGA20ox1‐2A‐PtrMYB221 transgenic poplars resulted in an improved biomass quantity comparable to those of 35S::PdGA20ox1 and DX15::PdGA20ox1 poplars, without any growth defects. For examples, the fresh weights of stems from transgenic poplars that were greenhouse‐grown for 60 days were increased by up to 2.29‐fold (Figure 2), and the height and stem diameter of three‐month transgenic poplars grown in LMO fields increased by up to 1.39‐ and 1.25‐fold, respectively, compared to WT (Figure 3). Thus, biomass (calculated with stem height and width) was increased by around 2.17‐fold in LMO field‐grown transgenic poplars. This quantitative increase of biomass is most likely from the wood forming tissue‐preferential production of GA by PdGA20ox1, as we have reported (Jeon et al., 2016; Park et al., 2015). However, root and leaf have no signs of growth defects in transgenic poplars (Figure 4). We speculate that this might come from an adequate increase of GA level in wood forming tissue specifically due to reduced PdGA20ox1‐2A‐PtrMYB221 transcripts in our DX15::PdGA20ox1‐2A‐PtrMYB221 transgenic poplars compared to 35S::PdGA20ox1 (Figure S3). Importantly, our transgenic poplars exhibited an improved quality of biomass. The lignin content of woody stems decreased by around 16.0 wt%, while holocellulose (cellulose + hemicellulose) content was increased by up to 6.6 wt% (Figure S5). Indeed, transgenic poplars revealed an irregular xylem phenotype due to reduced secondary wall thickening, most likely caused by decreased lignin biosynthesis (Figure 5). In fact, most of the lignin biosynthetic genes were decreased (Figure 5a), suggesting that PtrMYB221 functions as a negative regulator of lignin biosynthesis. However, secondary xylem formation (i.e., width of secondary xylem) was increased more than 45% compared to WT (Figure 5a), and gelatinous fibers, which are cellulose‐rich, were clearly developed (Clair et al., 2006). These results are consistent with those from our previous transgenic poplars (Jeon et al., 2016; Park et al., 2015) and may explain the dramatic increase of cellulose content (~28 wt%) in DX15::PdGA20ox1‐2A‐PtrMYB221 transgenic poplars compared to WT poplars (Figure S4). A similar observation reported that the repression of lignin biosynthesis promotes cellulose accumulation in transgenic poplars (Hu et al., 1999). It has been widely accepted that an increase in hollocellulose content and a decrease in lignin content are beneficial to bio‐oil production via pyrolysis (Hu et al., 2016; Kan et al., 2016). Our previous study of pyrolysis characteristics and kinetics showed that transgenic poplars required a lower input energy for thermal decomposition and yielded a higher quantity of bio‐oil than the WT under the same pyrolysis conditions in isothermal pyrolysis experiments (Vo et al., 2017). Furthermore, saccharification efficiency in our transgenic poplar increased significantly by up to 8% at 24 h (Figure 6). Lignin imparts waterproofness, durability, and mechanical strength to the secondary cell wall. These properties of lignin act as a serious inhibitor during the saccharification process of woody materials (i.e., secondary xylem) for liquid biofuel production (Carroll and Somerville, 2009; Simmons et al., 2010). Thus, the increased saccharification efficiency in our transgenic poplars suggests that ligation of the secondary cell walls might have been loosened to decrease mechanical strength due to reduced lignin biosynthesis. Interestingly, the reduced lignin contents in the transgenic poplars seem to not affect the growth fitness in the field condition. Our over‐winter growth analysis in the LMO field showed that all the DX15::PdGA20ox1‐2A‐PtrMYB221 plants were survived after winter season, while 35S::PdGA20ox1 poplars showed only 20%–40% of survival rate (Figure S6a), possibly by the precocious bud flushing (Figure S6b) due to high level of GA contents in winter buds. These results suggest that our DX15::PdGA20ox1‐2A‐PtrMYB221 plants are no different from WT poplars in surviving winter, a period of extensive abiotic stresses including cold, freezing and drought. Although a multi‐cistronic gene expression system with the 2A self‐cleaving peptide (2A) has been successfully utilized in both plants and animals (Daniels et al., 2014; Ha et al., 2010; Lee et al., 2012; Mikkelsen et al., 2010; Tian et al., 2013; Trichas et al., 2008; Zhang et al., 2017), no report has yet been made in Populus tree species. Our transgenic poplars exhibiting both improved quantity and quality of woody biomass suggest that the 2A system may be operated to produce PdGA20ox1 and PtrMYB221 proteins, respectively. However, a detailed molecular analysis will be necessary to confirm the production of these proteins. In summary, we utilized the viral 2A system in a synthetic biological approach to express both PdGA20ox1 and PtrMYB221 in wood forming‐tissue specifically to improve woody biomass. The resulting transgenic poplars showed a superior woody biomass without growth penalties. Thus, by substituting suitable transcriptional regulators as demonstrated (Ko et al., 2017), our strategy can be utilized as an efficient biotechnological tool for producing the desired woody biomass and expanded to various bioenergy crops.

Experimental procedures

Plant materials and growth conditions

Arabidopsis thaliana, ecotype Columbia (Col‐0), was used in both wild‐type and transgenic plant experiments. Arabidopsis were grown in soil in a growth room (14 h light; light intensity, 150 μmol/m2/s) at 23 °C or on half‐strength Murashige and Skoog medium (MS, Sigma‐Aldrich) containing 2% sucrose with appropriate antibiotics for screening. Hybrid poplars (Populus alba × P. tremular var. glandulosa, clone BH) were used as both wild‐type controls and transgenic plants in this study. The plants were acclimated in soil and grown in controlled conditions in a growth room (16 h light; light intensity, 150 μmol/m2/s; 24 °C).

Vector construction and plant transformation

The full‐length cDNAs encoding PdGA20ox1 and PtrMYB221 were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) from cDNA of P. densiflora and P. trichocarpa, respectively. A virus‐derived 2A peptide sequence was used to produce a fusion gene of PdGA20ox1 (without the stop codon) and PtrMYB221 expressed with the DX15 promoter (Figure S1). We modified the 2A nucleotide sequence consisting of 13 amino acids to be optimized for codon usage of poplar, and the fusion gene was inserted downstream of the DX15 promoter in the DX15‐pMDC32 vector (Jeon et al., 2016) using the Gateway cloning system. The vector constructs were then introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain C58, which was used to transform Arabidopsis and poplar by the floral‐dip method (Clough and Bent, 1998) and leaf disk transformation‐regeneration method (Choi et al., 2005; Horsch et al., 1985), respectively. All of the constructs used in this study were verified by DNA sequencing.

Histological analysis

Poplar main stems (15th internode) from 60‐day‐old soil‐grown plants or rosette level stem of Arabidopsis plants were used to obtain hand‐cut cross‐sections and stained with either 0.05% toluidine blue O or 2% phloroglucinol/HCl for 1 min as described previously (Jeon et al., 2016).

RNA extraction and RT‐PCR

Total RNAs of Arabidopsis were extracted using Trizol reagent (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) as described previously (Jeon et al., 2016). Total RNAs of poplar were extracted using the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method with slight modification (Logemann et al., 1987). In brief, a fine powder of plant tissues was mixed with CTAB buffer, followed by phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1) extraction. Isopropanol was added to the mixture to isolate RNA. One microgram of total RNA was reverse‐transcribed using Superscript III reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) in 20 μL reactions. Subsequent RT‐PCR was performed with 1 μL of the reaction product as a template. Quantitative real‐time PCR was performed using the CFX96TM Real‐Time PCR Detection System (Bio‐Rad, Hercules, CA) with iQTM SYBR® Supermix (Bio‐Rad). Poplar ACTIN2 gene was used as the internal quantitative control, and relative expression level was calculated by the 2−▵▵Ct method (Pfaffl, 2001). All primer sequences were designed using Primer3 software (http://fokker.wi.mit.edu). Sequences are provided in Table S1.

Measurement of growth parameters of poplar

Overall growth parameters of 2‐month‐old, greenhouse‐grown poplars transplanted and grown for 3 months at LMO sites (latitude 37.2N, longitude 126.9E) were measured. Parameters assessed were stem height (measured from top to bottom) and diameter (stem thickness measured at 10 cm above the soil level using slide calipers). Three leaves, the largest from the 10th to18th leaves from the top, were used for measurements of leaf area and chlorophyll content with an LI‐3100 area meter (LI‐COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE) and ethanol extraction method (Lichtenthaler, 1987), respectively.

Saccharification efficiency of transgenic poplar

Saccharification efficiency of transgenic poplars grown for 3 months at LMO sites was measured. Stem tissues were dried at 65 °C for 3 days and ground to a fine powder. Reducing sugar content was determined using the method of Yang et al. (2013) with slight modification. Briefly, for pretreatment, the ground materials (~2 mg) were transferred into a 2‐mL screw‐cap tube and incubated with 200 μL of water or 180 μL of NaOH (1%, w/v) at 30 °C for 30 min and autoclaved at 120 °C for 60 min. After cooling to room temperature, 200 μL of water was added to water treated sample, while 200 μL of 2.5 N HCl was used to neutralize the 1% NaOH treated sample. After pretreatment, 300 μL of 0.1 m sodium acetate buffer pH 5.0 containing 40 μg of tetracycline, 10 mg cellulose, and 1 mg ß‐glucosidase was added. After 24, 48, and 72 h of incubation at 37 °C with shaking (180 r.p.m.), samples were centrifuged (15 000  for 3 min), and 5 μL of the supernatant was collected for the measurement of reducing sugar using the DNS (3,5‐dinitrosalicylate) assay (Miller, 1959). The DNS reaction was performed by mixing 5 μL of the sample and 5 μL of water with 90 μL of DNS reagent in a PCR tube, followed by incubation at 95 °C for 6 min. Reducing sugar was quantified by measuring the absorbance at ƛ550. Glucose solutions were used as standards. Figure S1 Schematic diagram of vector construction for bicistronic gene expression under the control of the DX15 promoter used in producing transgenic plants. Figure S2 PtrMYB221, a poplar MYB transcription factor, is the closest homolog of EgMYB1. Figure S3 Stem‐specific expression of PdGA20ox1 transcripts in transgenic poplar plants. Figure S4 Irregular xylem phenotype of transgenic Arabidopsis plants. Figure S5 Contents of cell wall components. Figure S6 Observation of over‐winter growth of transgenic poplars in LMO field. Table S1 Primers used in this study. Click here for additional data file.
  56 in total

1.  Tissue-type-specific transcriptome analysis identifies developing xylem-specific promoters in poplar.

Authors:  Jae-Heung Ko; Hyun-Tae Kim; Ildoo Hwang; Kyung-Hwan Han
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 9.803

2.  Feedstocks for lignocellulosic biofuels.

Authors:  Chris Somerville; Heather Youngs; Caroline Taylor; Sarah C Davis; Stephen P Long
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Application of two bicistronic systems involving 2A and IRES sequences to the biosynthesis of carotenoids in rice endosperm.

Authors:  Sun-Hwa Ha; Ying Shi Liang; Harin Jung; Mi-Jeong Ahn; Seok-Cheol Suh; Soon-Jong Kweon; Dong-Hern Kim; Young-Mi Kim; Ju-Kon Kim
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 9.803

4.  Developing xylem-preferential expression of PdGA20ox1, a gibberellin 20-oxidase 1 from Pinus densiflora, improves woody biomass production in a hybrid poplar.

Authors:  Hyung-Woo Jeon; Jin-Seong Cho; Eung-Jun Park; Kyung-Hwan Han; Young-Im Choi; Jae-Heung Ko
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 9.803

5.  Gibberellins inhibit adventitious rooting in hybrid aspen and Arabidopsis by affecting auxin transport.

Authors:  Mélanie Mauriat; Anna Petterle; Catherine Bellini; Thomas Moritz
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 6.417

Review 6.  To gibberellins and beyond! Surveying the evolution of (di)terpenoid metabolism.

Authors:  Jiachen Zi; Sibongile Mafu; Reuben J Peters
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Biol       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 26.379

7.  Genome-wide characterization of the lignification toolbox in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Jeroen Raes; Antje Rohde; Jørgen Holst Christensen; Yves Van de Peer; Wout Boerjan
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Engineering secondary cell wall deposition in plants.

Authors:  Fan Yang; Prajakta Mitra; Ling Zhang; Lina Prak; Yves Verhertbruggen; Jin-Sun Kim; Lan Sun; Kejian Zheng; Kexuan Tang; Manfred Auer; Henrik V Scheller; Dominique Loqué
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 9.803

9.  Poplar PdMYB221 is involved in the direct and indirect regulation of secondary wall biosynthesis during wood formation.

Authors:  Xianfeng Tang; Yamei Zhuang; Guang Qi; Dian Wang; Huanhuan Liu; Kairong Wang; Guohua Chai; Gongke Zhou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Expression of multiple transgenes from a single construct using viral 2A peptides in Drosophila.

Authors:  Richard W Daniels; Adam J Rossano; Gregory T Macleod; Barry Ganetzky
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  7 in total

1.  Overexpression of a Poplar RING-H2 Zinc Finger, Ptxerico, Confers Enhanced Drought Tolerance via Reduced Water Loss and Ion Leakage in Populus.

Authors:  Min-Ha Kim; Jin-Seong Cho; Eung-Jun Park; Hyoshin Lee; Young-Im Choi; Eun-Kyung Bae; Kyung-Hwan Han; Jae-Heung Ko
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 5.923

2.  Identifying transcription factors that reduce wood recalcitrance and improve enzymatic degradation of xylem cell wall in Populus.

Authors:  Chiaki Hori; Naoki Takata; Pui Ying Lam; Yuki Tobimatsu; Soichiro Nagano; Jenny C Mortimer; Dan Cullen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 3.  The Threat of the Combined Effect of Biotic and Abiotic Stress Factors in Forestry Under a Changing Climate.

Authors:  Demissew Tesfaye Teshome; Godfrey Elijah Zharare; Sanushka Naidoo
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 4.  Advances and Perspectives of Transgenic Technology and Biotechnological Application in Forest Trees.

Authors:  Yiyi Yin; Chun Wang; Dandan Xiao; Yanting Liang; Yanwei Wang
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 5.  Plant Development and Crop Yield: The Role of Gibberellins.

Authors:  Ricardo Castro-Camba; Conchi Sánchez; Nieves Vidal; Jesús Mª Vielba
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-10-09

6.  Association mapping for yield traits in Paeonia rockii based on SSR markers within transcription factors of comparative transcriptome.

Authors:  Na Liu; Fangyun Cheng
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 4.215

7.  Transcriptomic study of pedicels from GA3-treated table grape genotypes with different susceptibility to berry drop reveals responses elicited in cell wall yield, primary growth and phenylpropanoids synthesis.

Authors:  Marco Meneses; Miguel García-Rojas; Claudia Muñoz-Espinoza; Tomás Carrasco-Valenzuela; Bruno Defilippi; Mauricio González-Agüero; Claudio Meneses; Rodrigo Infante; Patricio Hinrichsen
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 4.215

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.