Mingming Wu1, Hendrik T Mulder2, Yuval Zur3, Silke Lechner-Greite4, Marion I Menzel4, Margarethus M Paulides2, Gerard C van Rhoon2, Axel Haase5. 1. Munich School of Bioengineering, Technical University of Munich, Boltzmannstr. 11, 85748, Garching bei München, Germany. mingming.wu@tum.de. 2. Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 3. GE Healthcare, Haifa, Israel. 4. GE Healthcare, Munich, Germany. 5. Munich School of Bioengineering, Technical University of Munich, Boltzmannstr. 11, 85748, Garching bei München, Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Mild hyperthermia (HT) treatments are generally monitored by phase-referenced proton resonance frequency shift calculations. A novel phase and thus temperature-sensitive fast spin echo (TFSE) sequence is introduced and compared to the double echo gradient echo (DEGRE) sequence. THEORY AND METHODS: For a proton resonance frequency shift (PRFS)-sensitive TFSE sequence, a phase cycling method is applied to separate even from odd echoes. This method compensates for conductivity change-induced bias in temperature mapping as does the DEGRE sequence. Both sequences were alternately applied during a phantom heating experiment using the clinical setup for deep radio frequency HT (RF-HT). The B0 drift-corrected temperature values in a region of interest around temperature probes are compared to the temperature probe data and further evaluated in Bland-Altman plots. The stability of both methods was also tested within the thighs of three volunteers at a constant temperature using the subcutaneous fat layer for B0-drift correction. RESULTS: During the phantom heating experiment, on average TFSE temperature maps achieved double temperature-to-noise ratio (TNR) efficiency in comparison with DEGRE temperature maps. In-vivo images of the thighs exhibit stable temperature readings of ± 1 °C over 25 min of scanning in three volunteers for both methods. On average, the TNR efficiency improved by around 25% for in vivo data. CONCLUSION: A novel TFSE method has been adapted to monitor temperature during mild HT.
OBJECTIVE: Mild hyperthermia (HT) treatments are generally monitored by phase-referenced proton resonance frequency shift calculations. A novel phase and thus temperature-sensitive fast spin echo (TFSE) sequence is introduced and compared to the double echo gradient echo (DEGRE) sequence. THEORY AND METHODS: For a proton resonance frequency shift (PRFS)-sensitive TFSE sequence, a phase cycling method is applied to separate even from odd echoes. This method compensates for conductivity change-induced bias in temperature mapping as does the DEGRE sequence. Both sequences were alternately applied during a phantom heating experiment using the clinical setup for deep radio frequency HT (RF-HT). The B0 drift-corrected temperature values in a region of interest around temperature probes are compared to the temperature probe data and further evaluated in Bland-Altman plots. The stability of both methods was also tested within the thighs of three volunteers at a constant temperature using the subcutaneous fat layer for B0-drift correction. RESULTS: During the phantom heating experiment, on average TFSE temperature maps achieved double temperature-to-noise ratio (TNR) efficiency in comparison with DEGRE temperature maps. In-vivo images of the thighs exhibit stable temperature readings of ± 1 °C over 25 min of scanning in three volunteers for both methods. On average, the TNR efficiency improved by around 25% for in vivo data. CONCLUSION: A novel TFSE method has been adapted to monitor temperature during mild HT.
Entities:
Keywords:
Conductivity; Double echo gradient echo; Fast spin echo; Hyperthermia; Intervention; MR thermometry; Proton resonance frequency shift
Authors: Johanna Gellermann; Waldemar Wlodarczyk; Bert Hildebrandt; Hildegard Ganter; Anett Nicolau; Beate Rau; Wolfgang Tilly; Horst Fähling; Jacek Nadobny; Roland Felix; Peter Wust Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2005-07-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Johanna Gellermann; Waldemar Wlodarczyk; Hildegard Ganter; Jacek Nadobny; Horst Fähling; Martin Seebass; Roland Felix; Peter Wust Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2005-01-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Mingming Wu; Hendrik T Mulder; Paul Baron; Eduardo Coello; Marion I Menzel; Gerard C van Rhoon; Axel Haase Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2020-05-05 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Iva VilasBoas-Ribeiro; Sven A N Nouwens; Sergio Curto; Bram de Jager; Martine Franckena; Gerard C van Rhoon; W P M H Heemels; Margarethus M Paulides Journal: Med Phys Date: 2022-06-26 Impact factor: 4.506