Literature DB >> 30515586

Comparison of the sustainability of bean production systems based on emergy and economic analyses.

Mohammad Reza Asgharipour1, Hasan Shahgholi2, Daniel E Campbell3, Issa Khamari4, Adel Ghadiri5.   

Abstract

To address increasing demand, bean producers have intensified agricultural activities by increasing application of industrial inputs. Such intensification can impose environmental risks to vulnerable ecosystems. Emergy and economic analyses were utilized in this study to investigate and compare the environmental performance of five management patterns specified by differing degrees of intensification, i.e., ecologic, integrated, low-, medium-, and high-input production systems at Bean Research Station in Khorram Dasht, Iran. The total emergy supporting these systems was estimated to be 6.52E + 15, 1.22E + 16, 6.62E + 15, 1.10E + 16, and 1.54E + 16 sej ha-1 for the ecologic, integrated, low-, medium-, and high-input systems, respectively. The purchased emergy inputs accounted for the largest portion of the total emergy inputs to these systems and ranged between 60.84 and 75.80%. The renewable fractions, transformities, emergy yield ratios, environmental loading ratios, emergy sustainability indices, and the economic output to input ratios demonstrate that the ecologic and low-input systems performed well compared to the three more industrial systems when considering their environmental sustainability. However, the more industrial systems had comparatively higher economic output. Generally, the results illustrate that sustainable bean production will depend on the transition from fossil fuel-intensive systems to more natural resource-intensive ones. To achieve more sustainable systems, applying conservation tillage and replacing chemical fertilizer with organic fertilizer are advocated for use in bean production systems. Joint use of emergy and economic evaluation provided different but complementary standpoints for comparison of the five bean production systems examined, and can assist in solving the problems that may occur in decision-making.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cropping systems; Economic output-input ratio; Emergy synthesis; Environmental loading ratio; Pulse crops

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30515586      PMCID: PMC6413504          DOI: 10.1007/s10661-018-7123-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  9 in total

1.  An energy systems view of sustainability: emergy evaluation of the San Luis Basin, Colorado.

Authors:  Daniel E Campbell; Ahjond S Garmestani
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 6.789

2.  Solutions for a cultivated planet.

Authors:  Jonathan A Foley; Navin Ramankutty; Kate A Brauman; Emily S Cassidy; James S Gerber; Matt Johnston; Nathaniel D Mueller; Christine O'Connell; Deepak K Ray; Paul C West; Christian Balzer; Elena M Bennett; Stephen R Carpenter; Jason Hill; Chad Monfreda; Stephen Polasky; Johan Rockström; John Sheehan; Stefan Siebert; David Tilman; David P M Zaks
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Emergy assessment of a wheat-maize rotation system with different water assignments in the north China plain.

Authors:  Shi Hu; Xingguo Mo; Zhonghui Lin; Jianxiu Qiu
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Integrated emergy and economic evaluation of lotus-root production systems on reclaimed wetlands surrounding the Pearl River Estuary, China.

Authors:  Hong-Fang Lu; Yao-Wen Tan; Wen-Sheng Zhang; Yan-Chun Qiao; Daniel E Campbell; Lang Zhong; Hai Ren
Journal:  J Clean Prod       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 9.297

5.  Synthetic fertilizer management for China's cereal crops has reduced N2O emissions since the early 2000s.

Authors:  Wenjuan Sun; Yao Huang
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 8.071

6.  An assessment of emergy, energy, and cost-benefits of grain production over 6 years following a biochar amendment in a rice paddy from China.

Authors:  Lei Wang; Lianqing Li; Kun Cheng; Chunying Ji; Qian Yue; Rongjun Bian; Genxing Pan
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Integrated emergy, energy and economic evaluation of rice and vegetable production systems in alluvial paddy fields: implications for agricultural policy in China.

Authors:  Hongfang Lu; Yu Bai; Hai Ren; Daniel E Campbell
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 6.789

8.  Ecological and economic dynamics of the Shunde agricultural system under China's small city development strategy.

Authors:  Hongfang Lu; Daniel E Campbell
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 6.789

9.  Bamboo vs. crops: an integrated emergy and economic evaluation of using bamboo to replace crops in south Sichuan Province, China.

Authors:  Hong-Fang Lu; Chun-Ju Cai; Xian-Shu Zeng; Daniel E Campbell; Shao-Hui Fan; Guang-Lu Liu
Journal:  J Clean Prod       Date:  2018-03-10       Impact factor: 9.297

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.