Literature DB >> 30515369

Preoperative Thrombocytopenia May Predict Poor Surgical Outcome after Extended Hepatectomy.

Mohammad Golriz1,2, Omid Ghamarnejad1, Elias Khajeh1, Mohammadsadegh Sabagh1, Markus Mieth1, Katrin Hoffmann1,2, Alexis Ulrich1, Thilo Hackert1, Karl Heinz Weiss2,3, Peter Schirmacher2,4, Markus W Büchler1, Arianeb Mehrabi1,2.   

Abstract

Background: It is a novel idea that platelet counts may be associated with postoperative outcome following liver surgery. This may help in planning an extended hepatectomy (EH), which is a surgical procedure with high morbidity and mortality. Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive potential of platelet counts on the outcome of EH in patients without portal hypertension, splenomegaly, or cirrhosis.
Methods: A series of 213 consecutive patients underwent EH (resection of ≥ five liver segments) between 2001 and 2016. The association of preoperative platelet counts with posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF), morbidity (based on Clavien-Dindo classification), and 30-day mortality was evaluated using multivariate analysis.
Results: PHLF was detected in 26.3% of patients, major complications in 26.8%, and 30-day mortality in 11.3% of patients. Multivariate analysis revealed that the preoperative platelet count is an independent predictor of PHLF (odds ratio [OR] 4.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3-15.0, p=0.020) and 30-day mortality (OR 4.4, 95% CI 1.1-18.8, p=0.043). Conclusions: Preoperative platelet count is associated with PHLF and mortality following extended liver resection. This association was independent of other related parameters. Prospective studies are needed to evaluate the predictive role and to determine the impact of preoperative correction of platelet count on postoperative outcomes after EH.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30515369      PMCID: PMC6236772          DOI: 10.1155/2018/1275720

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 2291-2789


1. Introduction

Extended hepatectomy (EH) is the only curative treatment for large primary or bilobar metastatic hepatic malignancies that improves long-term survival [1, 2]. Surgical developments, better patient selection, and improvements in perioperative care have increased the number of EH procedures being performed [3, 4]. However, the rate of postoperative morbidity is high following EH, especially posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) [5, 6]. Preoperative predictive factors of PHLF may play an important role in assessing the risk of post-EH morbidity and mortality. Several studies have evaluated different predictive factors for PHLF and other postoperative clinical outcomes [7-12]. Recently, the association of the perioperative (preoperative or immediate postoperative) platelet count with PHLF and postoperative mortality has been investigated [13-16]. However, findings have been controversial; some studies have shown a negative association between perioperative platelet counts and postoperative morbidity and mortality, while findings from other studies have indicated no association [13, 15, 17]. Although low platelet count is related to intraoperative poor outcome such as bleeding, it may have a direct impact on posthepatectomy outcomes by promoting liver regeneration and lowering the risk of PHLF. To the best of our knowledge, the association between preoperative platelet count and postoperative outcome has not been investigated exclusively in EH, which has a higher postoperative morbidity and mortality compared with minor hepatectomy. The aim of this study was to investigate the association of the preoperative platelet count and postoperative clinical outcomes following EH in patients without portal hypertension, splenomegaly, or cirrhosis. To do this, we investigated the effect of preoperative thrombocytopenia on PHLF, morbidity, and mortality after EH.

2. Patients and Methods

2.1. Study Population

We investigated all patients who underwent liver resection to treat primary, metastatic, or benign liver disease at the department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery at the University of Heidelberg between October 2001 and September 2016. All patients were followed up until September 2017. Only patients who underwent EH were included in the study. EH was defined as resection of five or more hepatic segments based on the Brisbane 2000 classification [18]. Patients under 18 years old and patients who underwent a two-stage hepatectomy (portal vein embolization or associated liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy) were excluded. At the end, a total of 213 patients were included in our study. Furthermore, preoperative imaging reports, intraoperative flowmetry, and postoperative histopathological examinations were screened to assess splenomegaly, portal hypertension, and cirrhosis, respectively. Demographic and baseline clinical characteristics, as well as data on the surgical procedure and perioperative course, were prospectively collected and analyzed. This study was approved by the independent ethics committee of the University of Heidelberg. All procedures were conducted in accordance with the most recent revision of the Declaration of Helsinki.

2.2. Definition and Classification of Postoperative Outcomes

PHLF was diagnosed and graded (grade A, B, or C) according to the proposed definition by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS) [19]. Briefly, PHLF was defined as an increased international normalized ratio (INR), the need for coagulation factors to maintain normal INR, and hyperbilirubinemia on or after postoperative day 5. Hyperbilirubinemia was defined as a serum bilirubin concentration greater than 1 mg/dl and increased INR was defined as an INR greater than 1.2. In patients with preoperative hyperbilirubinemia or increased INR, PHLF was defined as an increase in serum bilirubin levels or INR on or after postoperative day 5. The severity of postoperative morbidities were classified as grade I to V based on the Clavien-Dindo classification [20]. Grade I and II morbidities were defined as minor and grade III and IV morbidities were defined as major. Postoperative mortality was defined as all-cause death occurring within the first 30 days after surgery.

2.3. Preoperative Evaluations

All preoperative clinical evaluations including medical history, physical examination, and laboratory findings were recorded. All patients underwent cross-sectional contrast-enhanced computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis to assess the resectability of the tumor and to plan the hepatectomy. The preoperative platelet count was measured on the day of surgery and thrombocytopenia was defined as a platelet count <150 x 109/L.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0 (IBM Corp. Released 2013. Armonk, NY). Categorical data were presented as frequencies and proportions, and continuous data were presented as means ± standard deviations. Categorical data were compared using chi-square test of association or Fisher's exact test. Continuous data were compared using Student's t-test. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine independent preoperative predictive factors of PHLF, major morbidity, and 30-day mortality. Variables with a p value <0.1 from the univariate analysis were included in the multivariate regression analysis. Results of univariate and multivariate analyses were reported as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). If thrombocytopenia was confirmed in the multivariate analysis, a comparison between patients with platelet counts <150 x 109/L and platelet counts ≥150 x 109/L was performed. One-year and three-year patient survival were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Patients who were lost to follow up were censored. The mean patient survival in the two groups was compared using the log-rank test. A two-sided p value less than 0.05 was considered significant in all analyses.

3. Results

The mean age of patients was 60.8±11.7 years and 50.7% were female. Primary hepatic malignancy was the most common indication for EH (57.7% of patients), and 35.8% of patients received preoperative systemic chemotherapy. PHLF was detected in 26.3% of patients, major complications (grade III–IV) in 26.8% of patients, and 30-day mortality in 11.3% of patients. Detailed patient demographics and clinical data are shown in Table 1.
Table 1

Clinicopathologic characteristics of patients who underwent extended hepatectomy.

Variables Total
(n = 213)
Age (years)60.8 ±11.7
Gender
 Female/male108/105
BMI (kg/m2)25.53 ± 4.44
ASA score
 Class 14 (2.5%)
 Class 276 (46.9%)
 Class 382 (50.6%)

Cirrhosis
 Yes7 (3.2%)
Indication of extended hepatectomy
 Benign liver disease9 (4.2%)
 Primary malignancy123 (57.7%)
  Cholangiocarcinoma105 (85.4)
  Hepatocellular carcinoma18 (14.6%)
 Metastatic disease81 (38.0%)
Preoperative chemotherapy
 Yes73 (35.8%)
Preoperative platelet count (x 109/L)
 Mean (SD)300.1 ± 121.5

Intraoperative blood loss (ml)1638.21 ± 1535.49
Transfusion of RBC
 Patient60 (31.1%)
  Unit1.52 ± 3.34
Transfusion of FFP
 Patient44 (22.8%)
  Unit1.43 ± 3.64
Operation time (min)293.78 ± 115.15

PHLF a56 (26.3%)
 Grade A16 (28.6%)
 Grade B14 (25.0%)
 Grade C26 (46.4%)
Major morbidity b57 (26.8%)
ICU stay (days)8.14 ± 13.47
Hospitalization (days)23.43 ± 16.68
30-day mortality24 (11.3%)

BMI: body mass index; ASA: American Society of Anesthesiologists; SD: standard deviation; RBC: red blood cells; FFP: fresh-frozen plasma; PHLF: posthepatectomy liver failure; ICU: intensive care unit.

a Based on the ISGLS definition.

b Grades III and IV based on the Clavien-Dindo classification.

Seventeen patients (8.0%) had a preoperative platelet count of <150 x 109/L (mean platelet count=122.3±22.3 x 109 per L), and the remaining 196 (92.0%) patients had a preoperative platelet count of ≥150 x 109/L (mean platelet count=315.5±114.0 x 109 per L). Baseline characteristics and clinical outcome of the patients with preoperative thrombocytopenia are shown in Table 2. Nine of 17 patients (52.9%) with preoperative platelet count <150 x 109/L were diagnosed with primary liver malignancy (cholangiocarcinoma). Furthermore, preoperative imaging, intraoperative flowmetry, and postoperative histopathological examinations revealed no splenomegaly, portal hypertension, or cirrhosis in the thrombocytopenia group. There were only seven patients with Child-Pugh score A cirrhosis in platelet count ≥150 x 109/L group. The postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) stay was longer in the preoperative platelet count <150 x 109/L group (16.7 ± 9.5 days versus 8.0 ± 14.5 days, p=0.017). Furthermore, in the group with platelet count of <150 x 109/L PHLF, major complications and 30-day mortality were detected in 58.8%, 35.3%, and 35.3% of patients, respectively (Table 2).
Table 2

Clinicopathologic characteristics of patients with a preoperative platelet count of <150 x 109/L.

Variables Total
(n = 17)
Age (years)63.1 ±12.5
Gender
 Female/male8/9
BMI (kg/m2)25.08 ± 3.88
ASA score
 Class 10 (0.0%)
 Class 28 (57.1%)
 Class 36 (42.9%)

Cirrhosis
 Yes0 (0.0%)
Indication of extended hepatectomy
 Benign liver disease2 (11.8%)
 Primary malignancy9 (52.9%)
  Cholangiocarcinoma9 (100%)
  Hepatocellular carcinoma0 (0.0%)
 Metastatic disease6 (35.3%)
Preoperative chemotherapy
 Yes5 (29.4%)
Preoperative platelet count (x 109/L)
 Mean (SD)122.3 ± 22.3

Intraoperative blood loss (ml)3352.94 ± 2019.32
Transfusion of RBC
 Patient8 (50.0%)
  Unit4.38 ± 6.26
Transfusion of FFP
 Patient9 (56.3%)
  Unit4.31 ± 5.91
Operation time (min)381.29 ± 136.05

PHLF a10 (58.8%)
 Grade A0 (0.0%)
 Grade B2 (20.0%)
 Grade C8 (80.0%)
Major morbidity b6 (35.3%)
ICU stay (days)16.65 ± 9.50
Hospitalization (days)30.18 ± 15.20
30-day mortality6 (35.3%)

BMI: body mass index; ASA: American Society of Anesthesiologists; SD: standard deviation; RBC: red blood cells; FFP: fresh-frozen plasma; PHLF: posthepatectomy liver failure; ICU: intensive care unit.

a Based on the ISGLS definition.

b Grades III and IV based on the Clavien-Dindo classification.

3.1. Predictive Value of Preoperative Platelet Count

To investigate the impact of the preoperative platelet count on postoperative outcomes including PHLF, morbidity, and 30-day mortality, we performed univariate and multivariate regression analysis. Univariate analysis (Table 3(a)) revealed that patients with a preoperative platelet count of <150 x 109/L are significantly more at risk of PHLF (OR 4.7, 95% CI 1.7–12.9, p=0.003). According to univariate analysis, indication of EH, intraoperative blood loss, transfusion of red blood cells or fresh frozen plasma, and operation time also had a significant impact on PHLF. In contrast, multivariate regression only revealed preoperative thrombocytopenia as an independent preoperative predictor of PHLF (OR 4.4, 95% CI 1.3–15.0, p=0.020). According to multivariate analysis, patient age (OR 1.1, 95% CI 1.0–1.1, p=0.001), metastatic liver disease (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.1–5.1, p=0.026), and operation time (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.0–1.5, p=0.042) independently predicted major postoperative morbidities (Table 3(b)). Postoperative major morbidities were fivefold higher in patients with a preoperative platelet count <150 x 109/L, but this difference was not significant (OR 4.9, 95% CI 0.9–26.3, p=0.062). Furthermore, multivariate analysis showed that postoperative 30-day mortality was fourfold higher in patients with thrombocytopenia compared with normal platelet counts (Table 3(c)) (OR 4.4, 95% CI 1.1–18.8, p=0.043). After excluding patients with underlying cirrhosis (n = 7), we repeated univariate and multivariate analysis of PHLF, major morbidity and 30-day mortality. As presented in Supplementary Table S1, multivariate analysis demonstrated that PHLF (OR 5.7, 95% CI 2.6–12.8, p<0.001) and 30-day mortality (OR 5.9, 95% CI 1.3–27.1, p=0.021) were sixfold higher in patients with thrombocytopenia compared with those with normal platelet counts.

3.2. Patient Survival

The six-month survival rate was 80.1%±2.8% in our cohort. Patients with a preoperative platelet count <150 x 109/L had a significantly lower six-month survival rate than patients with a preoperative platelet count ≥150 x 109/L (Figure 1, 47.1%±12.1% versus 83.0%±2.8%, log-rank p<0.001).
Figure 1

Six-month patient survival plot: significantly lower survival rates in patients with low preoperative platelet counts (<150 x 109/L) compared with normal preoperative platelet counts (≥150) (log-rank test p<0.001).

4. Discussion

PHLF is a severe and potentially lethal complication after liver resection and is responsible for more than 60% of mortalities after EH [21, 22]. The high rate of mortality and morbidity following EH is a major concern in field of hepatobiliary surgery. Although low platelet count is associated with increased blood loss and longer operation time, it has been shown that low platelet counts can independently diminish postoperative liver regeneration and increase the risk of PHLF as well mortality [13, 23]. Recently, the effect of perioperative (preoperative or immediate postoperative) platelet counts on posthepatectomy morbidity and mortality has been investigated [13, 16, 24–28]. However, these studies investigated the predictive role of platelet count in all types of liver resection (minor, major, and extended) and did not distinguish between the different types of resection. PHLF and mortality rates are higher after EH, therefore we believe that the post-EH outcome is more clinically important and that the predictive role of platelet counts should be investigated separately following EH. To do this, we assessed the association of platelet counts and postoperative outcomes in a homogeneous subgroup of liver resection patients who underwent EH. We demonstrated that a low preoperative platelet count is a predictive factor of PHLF and higher mortality after EH. In our series of EHs, the odds of development of PHLF and 30-day mortality in patients with low platelet counts were more than 4 and 6 fold higher than patients with normal platelet count, respectively. Moreover, our results showed that long-term survival was lower in patients with low platelet count than patients with normal platelet count. These findings indicate that a low platelet count independently predicts short- and long-term outcomes after EH. We selected a cut-off value of 150 x 109/L for platelet counts because this is the minimum normal platelet count in our center and in most clinical settings. In agreement with our findings, Alkozai et al. [9] reported a fourfold higher 90-day mortality rate after liver resection in colorectal metastasis patients with thrombocytopenia. They also reported delayed postoperative recovery of liver function in patients with low platelet count. However, in their study only 40% of patients underwent liver resection with remnant liver volume of <35%. Others have also shown that perioperative thrombocytopenia affects PHLF, morbidity, and mortality rates [24, 28]. Similar to our study, Venkat et al. [15], Maithel et al. [25], and Margonis et al. [26] evaluated the effect of perioperative platelet counts on PHLF and/or mortality with a cut-off value of 150 x 109/L. Although these studies were not consistent in the platelet cut-off levels and type of liver resection they investigated, each has shown that platelet count (100 x 109/L or 150 x 109/L) is associated with posthepatectomy outcomes. In contrast, some authors have reported no significant association between perioperative platelet count and posthepatectomy outcomes [23, 29]. However, in these studies the platelet count was used as a continuous variable in univariate and/or multivariable analyses. In this regard, it is important to know that the exponentiated coefficient of a continuous predictor in logistic regression is the OR of a one-unit increase in the predictor. A one-unit change in platelet count is not clinically meaningful, which may explain why these authors did not find platelet counts to have significant predictive value. The predictive role of platelets on PHLF and postoperative mortality may be explained by various mechanisms. One proposed mechanism is the direct promotion of liver regeneration by platelets [30]. This was first suggested by Tomikawa et al. [31] in 1996, who showed that platelets promote liver regeneration after resection by upregulating hepatocyte growth factor. Recent studies have shown that platelets secrete several bioactive factors including serotonin, vascular endothelial growth factor, platelet-derived growth factor, and tumor necrosis factors (TNF-α and TNF-β) to promote liver regeneration in a “direct way” [23, 32, 33]. Another possible mechanism is the “indicative role” of platelets for liver regeneration, which has been described by the parallel regulation of platelet production and liver regeneration by similar factors. Thrombopoietin and interleukin 6 regulate megakaryocyte maturation and platelet production, and can predict the postoperative patient outcome and trigger liver regeneration after hepatectomy [29, 34]. The risk of intra- and postoperative bleeding is increased in patients with thrombocytopenia. This increased blood loss can lead to additional hypoxic liver damage and therefore impaired hepatocyte function/regeneration. This could also explain PHLF and mortality in patients with thrombocytopenia. Surprisingly, Tomimaru and colleagues [14] showed that the platelet count is a better predictor of PHLF in hepatocellular carcinoma patients than the indocyanine green clearance test. Furthermore, the association between low preoperative platelet count and high portal vein pressure suggests an alternative mechanism [25]. Low platelet counts in patients with liver disease may be secondary to the increased portal vein pressure and subsequent hypersplenism and increased thrombocyte sequestration in the spleen. Indeed, platelet counts can predict PHLF as an accurate and precise surrogate of the portal vein pressure. However, in our study none of the patients in the thrombocytopenia group had splenomegaly, portal hypertension, or cirrhosis. In addition, we performed a subgroup analysis in noncirrhotic patients to reveal the direct association of platelet count with PHLF and mortality. The retrospective design is a limitation of the present study. However, platelet counts, other laboratory measurements, morbidity, and mortality of all consecutive patients were all recorded prospectively during the study period. To minimize potential bias and estimate the independent effect of the platelet count as accurately as possible, we controlled factors that are known to affect post-EH morbidity and mortality. These potentially confounding factors included age, gender, BMI, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, indication of EH, intraoperative blood loss and transfusion, and operation time using univariate and multivariate regression analyses. Therefore, we evaluated the predictive role of platelet count independent of these factors. Cirrhosis is also associated with low platelet count so may confound the effect of thrombocytopenia on posthepatectomy outcome [35]. Therefore, we performed a subgroup analysis after exclusion of patients with cirrhosis.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, preoperative thrombocytopenia seems to be a reliable predictor of PHLF and increased mortality after EH. This predictive role is independent of other related parameters, including age, cause of hepatectomy, intraoperative blood loss, and duration of surgery. Further randomized studies are required to evaluate the impact of increasing the preoperative platelet count (exogenous platelet infusion versus treatment of the underlying disease) on improving the postoperative outcomes after EH in patients with thrombocytopenia.

(a) PHLF

Variables Univariate Multivariate
OR95% CI p OR95% CI p
Age1.0150.988–1.0430.280
Gender0.9630.523–1.7720.902
BMI (kg/m2)0.9890.914–1.0710.793
ASA score1.4290.743–2.7510.285

Indication of extended hepatectomy
 Benign liver diseaseReferenceReferenceReferenceReferenceReferenceReference
 Primary malignancy1.3670.256–7.2900.7140.8100.120–5.4700.828
 Metastatic disease2.3061.159–4.5910.0171.8970.806–4.4630.141
Preoperative chemotherapy1.6790.723–3.8960.228
Platelet count <150 x 109/L4.6581.678–12.9290.0034.3511.266–14.9530.020

Intraoperative blood loss (L)1.1591.036–1.2970.0100.8840.615–1.2710.506
Intraoperative RBC/FFP transfusion2.6171.343–5.0980.0052.2260.859–5.7690.099
Operation time (hour)1.2641.076–1.4840.0041.1670.961–1.4170.120

(b) Major morbidity

Variables Univariate Multivariate
OR95% CI p OR95% CI p
Age1.0361.010–1.0620.0061.0501.020–1.0830.001
Gender1.1480.669–1.9690.617
BMI (kg/m2)1.0110.944–1.0830.758
ASA score1.3290.752–2.3460.328

Indication of extended hepatectomy
 Benign liver diseaseReferenceReferenceReferenceReferenceReferenceReference
 Primary malignancy2.0170.497–8.1870.3261.3470.195–9.2910.762
 Metastatic disease3.3311.827–6.072<0.0012.3871.111–5.1270.026
Preoperative chemotherapy0.6260.274–1.4280.266
Platelet count <150 x 109/L10.4272.321–46.8450.0024.9230.922–26.2960.062

Intraoperative blood loss (L)1.3651.181–1.577<0.0011.3090.863–1.9850.206
Intraoperative RBC/FFP transfusion2.8801.555–5.3360.0011.2850.491–3.3630.610
Operation time (hour)1.4311.215–1.685<0.0011.2371.007–1.5200.042

(c) 30-day mortality

Variables Univariate Multivariate
OR95% CI p OR95% CI p
Age1.0380.997–1.0820.0731.0380.994–1.0850.094
Gender1.7200.718–4.1240.224
BMI (kg/m2)1.0320.928–1.1470.564
ASA score1.1790.504–2.7620.704

Indication of extended hepatectomy
 Benign liver diseaseReferenceReferenceReferenceReferenceReferenceReference
 Primary malignancy2.4060.239–24.2200.4561.7840.078–40.7960.717
 Metastatic disease3.5171.150–10.7540.0273.4600.856–13.9800.081
Preoperative chemotherapy0.5700.126–2.5680.464
Platelet count <150 x 109/L5.3941.784–16.3110.0034.4301.055–18.7770.043

Intraoperative blood loss (L)1.3421.085–1.6590.0071.1660.753–1.8050.492
Intraoperative RBC/FFP transfusion3.2161.295–7.9860.0121.6040.435–5.9210.478
Operation time (hour)1.2611.023–1.5550.0301.0930.839–1.4250.509

OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; BMI: body mass index; ASA: American Society of Anesthesiologists; RBC: red blood cells; FFP: fresh-frozen plasma.

  33 in total

1.  Value of primary operative drain placement after major hepatectomy: a multi-institutional analysis of 1,041 patients.

Authors:  Malcolm H Squires; Neha L Lad; Sarah B Fisher; David A Kooby; Sharon M Weber; Adam Brinkman; Juan M Sarmiento; Charles R Scoggins; Michael E Egger; Kenneth Cardona; Clifford S Cho; Robert C G Martin; Maria C Russell; Emily Winslow; Charles A Staley; Shishir K Maithel
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2015-01-02       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 2.  IL-6 pathway in the liver: From physiopathology to therapy.

Authors:  Dirk Schmidt-Arras; Stefan Rose-John
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 25.083

Review 3.  Strategies for safer liver surgery and partial liver transplantation.

Authors:  Pierre-Alain Clavien; Henrik Petrowsky; Michelle L DeOliveira; Rolf Graf
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-04-12       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  The predictive value of postoperative clinical risk scores for outcome after hepatic resection: a validation analysis in 807 patients.

Authors:  Nuh N Rahbari; Christoph Reissfelder; Moritz Koch; Heike Elbers; Fabian Striebel; Markus W Büchler; Jürgen Weitz
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Posthepatectomy liver failure: a definition and grading by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS).

Authors:  Nuh N Rahbari; O James Garden; Robert Padbury; Mark Brooke-Smith; Michael Crawford; Rene Adam; Moritz Koch; Masatoshi Makuuchi; Ronald P Dematteo; Christopher Christophi; Simon Banting; Val Usatoff; Masato Nagino; Guy Maddern; Thomas J Hugh; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Paul Greig; Myrddin Rees; Yukihiro Yokoyama; Sheung Tat Fan; Yuji Nimura; Joan Figueras; Lorenzo Capussotti; Markus W Büchler; Jürgen Weitz
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Impact of early postoperative platelet count on volumetric liver gain and perioperative outcomes after major liver resection.

Authors:  G A Margonis; N Amini; S Buettner; S Besharati; Y Kim; F Sobhani; I R Kamel; T M Pawlik
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 7.  Thrombocytopenia associated with chronic liver disease.

Authors:  Nezam Afdhal; John McHutchison; Robert Brown; Ira Jacobson; Michael Manns; Fred Poordad; Babette Weksler; Rafael Esteban
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2008-03-31       Impact factor: 25.083

Review 8.  Novel functions of platelets in the liver.

Authors:  Tomohiro Kurokawa; Yun-Wen Zheng; Nobuhiro Ohkohchi
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.029

9.  Evidence for serotonin as a relevant inducer of liver regeneration after liver resection in humans.

Authors:  Patrick Starlinger; Alice Assinger; Stefanie Haegele; David Wanek; Silvia Zikeli; Dominic Schauer; Peter Birner; Edith Fleischmann; Birgit Gruenberger; Christine Brostjan; Thomas Gruenberger
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 17.425

10.  Deficiency in thrombopoietin induction after liver surgery is associated with postoperative liver dysfunction.

Authors:  Stefanie Haegele; Florian Offensperger; David Pereyra; Elisabeth Lahner; Alice Assinger; Edith Fleischmann; Birgit Gruenberger; Thomas Gruenberger; Christine Brostjan; Patrick Starlinger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  11 in total

1.  Regional liver function analysis with gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI and virtual hepatectomy: prediction of postoperative short-term outcomes for HCC.

Authors:  Mengqi Huang; Shunli Shen; Huasong Cai; Zhenpeng Peng; Wan Hang Keith Chiu; Zi-Ping Li; Baogang Peng; Shi-Ting Feng
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Liver regeneration biology: Implications for liver tumour therapies.

Authors:  Christopher Hadjittofi; Michael Feretis; Jack Martin; Simon Harper; Emmanuel Huguet
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-12-24

Review 3.  Issues to be considered to address the future liver remnant prior to major hepatectomy.

Authors:  Yoji Kishi; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Evaluation of the role of transhepatic flow in postoperative outcomes following major hepatectomy (THEFLOW): study protocol for a single-centre, non-interventional cohort study.

Authors:  Mohammad Golriz; Anastasia Lemekhova; Elias Khajeh; Omid Ghamarnejad; Mohammed Al-Saeedi; Oliver Strobel; Thilo Hackert; Beat Müller-Stich; Martin Schneider; Christoph Berchtold; Parham Tinoush; Philipp Mayer; De-Hua Chang; Karl Heinz Weiss; Katrin Hoffmann; Arianeb Mehrabi
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 5.  Clinical Implications of Thrombocytopenia for the Cirrhotic Patient.

Authors:  Samuel H Sigal; Zachary Sherman; Arun Jesudian
Journal:  Hepat Med       Date:  2020-04-14

6.  Comparison of score-based prediction of 90-day mortality after liver resection.

Authors:  Tanja Knoblich; Ulf Hinz; Christos Stravodimos; Michael R Schön; Arianeb Mehrabi; Markus W Büchler; Katrin Hoffmann
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Preoperative platelet count does not predict the occurrence of post-hepatectomy liver failure after partial hepatectomy in a retrospective monocentric cohort study.

Authors:  Sofia El Hajji; Alexandre Balaphas; Christian Toso; Carmen Gonelle-Gispert; Léo Bühler; Jeremy Meyer
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  A cohort study of hepatectomy-related complications and prediction model for postoperative liver failure after major liver resection in 1,441 patients without obstructive jaundice.

Authors:  Bin Li; Yingyi Qin; Zhiquan Qiu; Jun Ji; Xiaoqing Jiang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-02

9.  Impact of Platelet Count on Perioperative Bleeding in Patients With Cirrhosis Undergoing Surgical Treatments of Liver Cancer.

Authors:  Vincenzo Ronca; Matteo Barabino; Roberto Santambrogio; Enrico Opocher; James Hodson; Emanuela Bertolini; Simone Birocchi; Gaetano Piccolo; PierMaria Battezzati; Marco Cattaneo; Gian Marco Podda
Journal:  Hepatol Commun       Date:  2021-10-30

10.  CT radiomics nomogram for the preoperative prediction of severe post-hepatectomy liver failure in patients with huge (≥ 10 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Fei Xiang; Xiaoyuan Liang; Lili Yang; Xingyu Liu; Sheng Yan
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-12-12       Impact factor: 2.754

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.