| Literature DB >> 30515182 |
Marta Gil-Martínez1, Álvaro López-García2, María T Domínguez3, Carmen M Navarro-Fernández1, Rasmus Kjøller2, Mark Tibbett4, Teodoro Marañón1.
Abstract
There is an increasinpan>g consensus that microbial communities have an important role inpan> mediatinpan>g ecosystem processes. Trait-based ecology predicts that the impact of the microbial communities on ecosystem functions will be mediated by the expression of their traits at community level. The link between the response of microbial community traits to environmental conditions and its effect on plant functioning is a gap in most current microbial ecology studies. In this study, we analyzed functional traits of ectomycorrhizal fungal species in order to understand the importance of their community assembly for the soil-plant relationships in holm oak trees (Quercus ilex subsp. ballota) growing in a gradient of exposure to anthropogenic trace element (TE) contamination after a metalliferous tailings spill. Particularly, we addressed how the ectomycorrhizal composition and morphological traits at community level mediate plant response to TE contamination and its capacity for phytoremediation. Ectomycorrhizal fungal taxonomy and functional diversity explained a high proportion of variance of tree functional traits, both in roots and leaves. Trees where ectomycorrhizal fungal communities were dominated by the abundant taxa Hebeloma cavipes and Thelephora terrestris showed a conservative root economics spectrum, while trees colonized by rare taxa presented a resource acquisition strategy. Conservative roots presented ectomycorrhizal functional traits characterized by high rhizomorphs formation and low melanization which may be driven by resource limitation. Soil-to-root transfer of TEs was explained substantially by the ectomycorrhizal fungal species composition, with the highest transfer found in trees whose roots were colonized by Hebeloma cavipes. Leaf phosphorus was related to ectomycorrhizal species composition, specifically higher leaf phosphorus was related to the root colonization by Thelephora terrestris. These findings support that ectomycorrhizal fungal community composition and their functional traits mediate plant performance in metal-contaminated soils, and have a high influence on plant capacity for phytoremediation of contaminants. The study also corroborates the overall effects of ectomycorrhizal fungi on ecosystem functioning through their mediation over the plant economics spectrum.Entities:
Keywords: Quercus ilex subsp. ballota (holm oak); ecosystem processes; heavy metal; microbiome; phytoremediation; root economics spectrum; symbiosis; trace element transfer
Year: 2018 PMID: 30515182 PMCID: PMC6255936 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01682
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
FIGURE 1Principal component analysis (PCA) ordination of (A) soil total trace elements (TEs) and (B) soil available TEs, sampled at 0-20 cm depth under holm oak trees (N = 40) and classification by site.
FIGURE 2Principal coordinate analysis ordination of ECM fungal species in symbioses with holm oak roots and classification by site. Arrows indicate signicant ECM species (p < 0.05).
Univariate and multivariate linear mixed models showing significant soil and ECM fungi fixed effects for each of the root traits and model explained variance.
| Response variable | Individual effects of soil factors | Individual effects of ECM fungal factors | Combining significant effects into the best predictive model | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nutrients and EA | Trace elements | PCoA axis 1 and 2 | Fungal traits CWM | Linear mixed effect models | Variance | |||||||||
| Root | Variable | Variable | Variable | Variable | Model | R2LMMm | R2LMMc | |||||||
| C (%) | Ca | <0.001 | Av. Mn | <0.001 | PCoA1 | 0.048 | Melanization | 0.003 | C = 45.43 – 0.001 Ca | 0.0003 | –4.11 | <0.001 | 0.31 | 0.31 |
| PCoA2 | 0.044 | Rhizomorph | 0.047 | |||||||||||
| N (%) | – | – | Total Zn | 0.006 | (PCoA1) | (0.053) | – | – | N = 0.25 + 0.0006 Total Zn | 0.0002 | 2.90 | 0.006 | 0.19 | 0.19 |
| C:N | – | – | Total Zn | 0.010 | PCoA1 | 0.012 | – | – | C:N = 141.70 – 29.64 PCoA1 | 11.07 | –2.68 | 0.012 | 0.22 | 0.40 |
| P (%) | – | – | – | – | PCoA1 | 0.009 | – | – | P = 0.09 + 0.02 PCoA1 | 0.007 | 2.80 | 0.009 | 0.21 | 0.22 |
| SRA (m2 kg-1) | – | – | – | – | PCoA1 | 0.045 | – | – | SRA = 9.47 + 0.62 PCoA1 | 0.30 | 2.10 | 0.045 | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| RDMC (mg g-1) | – | – | – | – | PCoA1 | 0.006 | – | – | RDMC = 427.04 – 22.04 PCoA1 | 7.40 | –2.98 | 0.006 | 0.22 | 0.22 |
FIGURE 3Relationship between selected key ECM fungal species composition and traits and their effects on (A) root P, (B) root dry matter content, (C) leaf P, (D) translocation factor Fe, (E) soil-to-root Fe transfer, and (F) soil-to-root Zn transfer in studied sites.
Univariate and multivariate linear mixed models showing significant soil and ECM fungi fixed effects for each of the soil-to-root (RS) transfer and translocation factor (TF) and model explained variance.
| Response variable | Individual effects of soil factors | Individual effects of ECM fungal factors | Combining significant effects into the best predictive model | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nutrients and EA | Trace elements | PCoA axis 1 and 2 | Fungal traits CWM | Linear mixed effect models | Variance | |||||||||
| Transfer | Variable | Variable | Variable | Variable | Model | R2LMMm | R2LMMc | |||||||
| RS As | – | – | Total As | 0.036 | PCoA2 | 0.008 | Melanization | 0.050 | RS As = -0.32 - 0.04 PCoA2 | PCoA2 0.01 | PCoA2 -3.54 | PCoA2 0.001 | 0.27 | 0.63 |
| + 0.006 Melanization | Mel 0.002 | Mel 2.90 | Mel 0.007 | |||||||||||
| RS Fe | NO3 | <0.001 | – | – | PCoA1 | 0.002 | Melanization | 0.004 | RS Fe = -0.12 + 0.009 NO3 | NO3 0.002 | NO3 4.39 | NO3 < 0.001 | 0.48 | 0.51 |
| Rhizomorph | 0.021 | + 0.003 Melanization | Mel 0.0009 | Mel 2.99 | Mel 0.005 | |||||||||
| RS Mn | Ca | 0.003 | Total Mn | 0.004 | PCoA2 | 0.039 | – | – | RS Mn = 0.61 - 0.00005 Ca -0.0003 Total Mn | Ca 0.00001 Total Mn 0.00009 | Ca -4.09 Total Mn -3.83 | Ca < 0.001 Total Mn < 0.001 | 0.44 | 0.44 |
| RS Zn | Ca | <0.001 | – | – | PCoA2 | <0.001 | Melanization | 0.041 | RS Zn = 0.50 - 0.16 PCoA2 | 0.03 | –5.29 | <0.001 | 0.46 | 0.51 |
| TF Fe | – | – | – | – | – | – | Hyphae | 0.026 | TF Fe = 0.009 + 0.0002 Hyphae | 0.0001 | 2.32 | 0.026 | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| TF Mn | NAG | <0.001 | – | – | PCoA1 | 0.004 | – | – | TF Mn = 3.62 + 1.82 PCoA1 | 0.58 | 3.15 | 0.004 | 0.16 | 0.75 |
| TF Zn | – | – | Total Zn | 0.007 | – | – | – | – | TF Zn = 0.98 - 0.002 Total Zn | 0.0007 | –2.88 | 0.007 | 0.22 | 0.61 |
Univariate and multivariate linear mixed models showing significant soil and ECM fungi fixed effects for each of the leaf traits and model explained variance.
| Response variable | Individual effects of soil factors | Individual effects of ECM fungal factors | Combining significant effects into the best predictive model | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nutrients and EA | Trace elements | PCoA axis 1 and 2 | Fungal traits CWM | Linear mixed effect models | Variance | |||||||||
| Leaf | Variable | Variable | Variable | Variable | Model | R2LMMm | R2LMMc | |||||||
| C (%) | – | – | Total As | 0.014 | PCoA1 | 0.010 | Hyphae | <0.001 | C = 48.56 + 1.93 PCoA1 + 0.019 Total As | PCoA1 0.50 Total As 0.006 | PCoA1 3.86 Total As 2.87 | PCoA1 < 0.001 Total As 0.008 | 0.51 | 0.51 |
| N (%) | P | <0.001 | – | – | – | – | – | – | N = 1.20 + 0.001 P | 0.002 | 4.45 | <0.001 | 0.35 | 0.35 |
| C:N | P | <0.001 | – | – | PCoA1 | 0.048 | – | – | C:N = 42.10 – 0.32 P | 0.09 | –3.47 | <0.001 | 0.25 | 0.26 |
| P (%) | P | 0.035 | Av. Mn | 0.007 | PCoA2 | 0.007 | – | – | P = 0.10 + 0.009 PCoA2 | 0.003 | 2.91 | 0.007 | 0.21 | 0.21 |
| N:P | – | – | – | – | PCoA2 | 0.039 | – | – | N:P = 13.30 – 0.90 PCoA2 | 0.42 | –2.16 | 0.039 | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| SLA (m2 kg-1) | NAG | 0.002 | – | – | – | – | – | – | SLA = 4.38 + 1.10 NAG | 0.33 | 3.35 | 0.002 | 0.24 | 0.24 |
| CCI (SPAD) | P | <0.001 | – | – | – | – | – | – | CCI = 44.37 + 0.30 P | 0.07 | 4.38 | <0.001 | 0.30 | 0.49 |