Monique Weemstra1,2, Liesje Mommer2, Eric J W Visser3, Jasper van Ruijven2, Thomas W Kuyper4, Godefridus M J Mohren1, Frank J Sterck1. 1. Forest Ecology and Forest Management group, Wageningen University, 6700 AA, Wageningen, the Netherlands. 2. Plant Ecology and Nature Conservation group, Wageningen University, 6700 AA, Wageningen, the Netherlands. 3. Department of Experimental Plant Ecology, Institute for Water and Wetland Research, Radboud University Nijmegen, 6500 GL, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. 4. Department of Soil Quality, Wageningen University, 6700 AA, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Abstract
Contents 1159 I. 1159 II. 1161 III. 1164 IV. 1166 1167 References 1167 SUMMARY: The search for a root economics spectrum (RES) has been sparked by recent interest in trait-based plant ecology. By analogy with the one-dimensional leaf economics spectrum (LES), fine-root traits are hypothesised to match leaf traits which are coordinated along one axis from resource acquisitive to conservative traits. However, our literature review and meta-level analysis reveal no consistent evidence of an RES mirroring an LES. Instead the RES appears to be multidimensional. We discuss three fundamental differences contributing to the discrepancy between these spectra. First, root traits are simultaneously constrained by various environmental drivers not necessarily related to resource uptake. Second, above- and belowground traits cannot be considered analogues, because they function differently and might not be related to resource uptake in a similar manner. Third, mycorrhizal interactions may offset selection for an RES. Understanding and explaining the belowground mechanisms and trade-offs that drive variation in root traits, resource acquisition and plant performance across species, thus requires a fundamentally different approach than applied aboveground. We therefore call for studies that can functionally incorporate the root traits involved in resource uptake, the complex soil environment and the various soil resource uptake mechanisms - particularly the mycorrhizal pathway - in a multidimensional root trait framework.
Contents 1159 I. 1159 II. 1161 III. 1164 IV. 1166 1167 References 1167 SUMMARY: The search for a root economics spectrum (RES) has been sparked by recent interest in trait-based plant ecology. By analogy with the one-dimensional leaf economics spectrum (LES), fine-root traits are hypothesised to match leaf traits which are coordinated along one axis from resource acquisitive to conservative traits. However, our literature review and meta-level analysis reveal no consistent evidence of an RES mirroring an LES. Instead the RES appears to be multidimensional. We discuss three fundamental differences contributing to the discrepancy between these spectra. First, root traits are simultaneously constrained by various environmental drivers not necessarily related to resource uptake. Second, above- and belowground traits cannot be considered analogues, because they function differently and might not be related to resource uptake in a similar manner. Third, mycorrhizal interactions may offset selection for an RES. Understanding and explaining the belowground mechanisms and trade-offs that drive variation in root traits, resource acquisition and plant performance across species, thus requires a fundamentally different approach than applied aboveground. We therefore call for studies that can functionally incorporate the root traits involved in resource uptake, the complex soil environment and the various soil resource uptake mechanisms - particularly the mycorrhizal pathway - in a multidimensional root trait framework.
Authors: Daniel C Laughlin; Liesje Mommer; Francesco Maria Sabatini; Helge Bruelheide; Thom W Kuyper; M Luke McCormack; Joana Bergmann; Grégoire T Freschet; Nathaly R Guerrero-Ramírez; Colleen M Iversen; Jens Kattge; Ina C Meier; Hendrik Poorter; Catherine Roumet; Marina Semchenko; Christopher J Sweeney; Oscar J Valverde-Barrantes; Fons van der Plas; Jasper van Ruijven; Larry M York; Isabelle Aubin; Olivia R Burge; Chaeho Byun; Renata Ćušterevska; Jürgen Dengler; Estelle Forey; Greg R Guerin; Bruno Hérault; Robert B Jackson; Dirk Nikolaus Karger; Jonathan Lenoir; Tatiana Lysenko; Patrick Meir; Ülo Niinemets; Wim A Ozinga; Josep Peñuelas; Peter B Reich; Marco Schmidt; Franziska Schrodt; Eduardo Velázquez; Alexandra Weigelt Journal: Nat Ecol Evol Date: 2021-06-10 Impact factor: 15.460
Authors: Zeqing Ma; Dali Guo; Xingliang Xu; Mingzhen Lu; Richard D Bardgett; David M Eissenstat; M Luke McCormack; Lars O Hedin Journal: Nature Date: 2018-02-21 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Katharina Mausolf; Werner Härdtle; Kirstin Jansen; Benjamin M Delory; Dietrich Hertel; Christoph Leuschner; Vicky M Temperton; Goddert von Oheimb; Andreas Fichtner Journal: Oecologia Date: 2018-05-10 Impact factor: 3.225
Authors: Carlos P Carmona; C Guillermo Bueno; Aurele Toussaint; Sabrina Träger; Riin Tamme; Sandra Díaz; Mari Moora; Alison D Munson; Meelis Pärtel; Martin Zobel Journal: Nature Date: 2021-09-29 Impact factor: 49.962