Literature DB >> 3051419

Predictors of prenatal care utilization.

T P McDonald1, A F Coburn.   

Abstract

Despite substantial evidence linking improved pregnancy outcomes with receipt of prenatal care and recent improvements in prenatal care utilization, specific subpopulations continue to receive inadequate or less than adequate care. The study reported here examined the predictive power of a set of variables describing the type of financial coverage available to the mother, attributes of the mother, father and family and characteristics of the health care system. A stratified random sample of mothers was generated from state birth certificate files and surveyed through the use of a mailed questionnaire. Stratification was designed to assure adequate representation of subgroups expected to receive less adequate prenatal care. The study findings indicate that there were deficiencies in prenatal care utilization and that these deficiencies were concentrated in specific areas and subpopulations within the state. While the majority of women in the study started prenatal care in the recommended first trimester, most did not maintain the recommended schedule of visits with their care provider. The following conditions were found to reduce the likelihood of receiving adequate care after controlling for service need: younger women (particularly adolescents); less educated (particularly those without a high school education); low income; longer travel time; Medicaid recipient; and rural resident. In addition, it was found that where one lives is a significant predictor of the adequacy of prenatal care even after controlling for all of the above variables. The authors conclude that it is important in assessing potential policy and program options for reducing differentials in prenatal care use to distinguish between economic and noneconomic barriers to utilization. Receipt of Medicaid does not assure adequate prenatal care use.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3051419     DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(88)90325-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  28 in total

1.  Area-level predictors of use of prenatal care in diverse populations.

Authors:  E Kieffer; G R Alexander; J Mor
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  Individual and Area Level Factors Associated with Prenatal, Delivery, and Postnatal Care in Pakistan.

Authors:  Henna Budhwani; Kristine Ria Hearld; Hanne Harbison
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-10

3.  Prenatal care among mothers involved with child protection services in Manitoba: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Elizabeth Wall-Wieler; Kathleen Kenny; Janelle Lee; Kellie Thiessen; Margaret Morris; Leslie L Roos
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Medicaid prenatal care: a comparison of use and outcomes in fee-for-service and managed care.

Authors:  J W Krieger; F A Connell; J P LoGerfo
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Source of bias in prenatal care utilization indices: implications for evaluating the Medicaid expansion.

Authors:  G R Alexander; M E Tompkins; D J Petersen; J Weiss
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Quantifying the adequacy of prenatal care: a comparison of indices.

Authors:  G R Alexander; M Kotelchuck
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

7.  Black/white differences in prenatal care utilization: an assessment of predisposing and enabling factors.

Authors:  T A LaVeist; V M Keith; M L Gutierrez
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Factors affecting the utilization of prenatal health care services in Jerusalem.

Authors:  A Y Ellencweig; H Palti; Y Neumark; M Donchin
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1993-04

9.  [Predictors of use of ante-natal care].

Authors:  I Valadez Figueroa; N Alfaro Alfaro; A Celis de la Rosa
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 1.137

10.  Access to obstetric care in rural areas: effect on birth outcomes.

Authors:  T S Nesbitt; F A Connell; L G Hart; R A Rosenblatt
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.