Literature DB >> 30511235

Insights into the Basal Activity and Activation Mechanism of the β1 Adrenergic Receptor Using Native Mass Spectrometry.

Agni F M Gavriilidou1,2, Hanna Hunziker1, Daniel Mayer3,4, Ziva Vuckovic3,4, Dmitry B Veprintsev5,6,7,8, Renato Zenobi9.   

Abstract

In the absence of orthosteric ligands, most G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) exist in an equilibrium of different conformational states. This equilibrium is shifted by an agonist towards the active state or by an inverse agonist towards the inactive state. The basal activity of the receptor, and its ability to activate intracellular signaling pathways, is defined by the probability that a fraction of the receptor adopts the active state in the absence of ligand. Despite breakthroughs in native MS of membrane proteins, GPCR-transducing complexes have not been studied by this approach until very recently. Here, we investigated different conformational states of the turkey β1 adrenergic receptor (tβ1AR) in complex with two transducing partners: a G protein mimicking nanobody, Nb80, and an engineered truncated Gs protein (miniGs), in the presence of the full agonist isoprenaline by native MS. Interestingly, complex formation with both transducing partners was also observed in the absence of agonist, and allowed us to quantify basal activity of tβ1AR. We followed the stepwise disassembly of the transducing complexes by increasing the concentration of the inverse agonist S32212 in the presence of a constant concentration of isoprenaline. This allowed us to determine the relative binding affinity of S32212 in comparison to isoprenaline by native MS. Our approach provides a fast and sensitive way to detect complexes, study their stability in the presence of different ligands, and determine relative ligand affinities. Native mass spectrometry thus has the potential to become a useful tool to screen for orthosteric and allosteric GPCR drugs. Graphical Abstract.

Entities:  

Keywords:  G-coupled protein receptors; Native electrospray ionization mass spectrometry

Year:  2018        PMID: 30511235     DOI: 10.1007/s13361-018-2110-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom        ISSN: 1044-0305            Impact factor:   3.109


  26 in total

Review 1.  Constitutive activity and inverse agonists of G protein-coupled receptors: a current perspective.

Authors:  Graeme Milligan
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.436

Review 2.  International Union of Pharmacology Committee on Receptor Nomenclature and Drug Classification. XXXVIII. Update on terms and symbols in quantitative pharmacology.

Authors:  Richard R Neubig; Michael Spedding; Terry Kenakin; Arthur Christopoulos
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 25.468

Review 3.  The druggable genome.

Authors:  Andrew L Hopkins; Colin R Groom
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 84.694

4.  Determining the stoichiometry and interactions of macromolecular assemblies from mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Helena Hernández; Carol V Robinson
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 5.  Emerging paradigms of β-arrestin-dependent seven transmembrane receptor signaling.

Authors:  Arun K Shukla; Kunhong Xiao; Robert J Lefkowitz
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 13.807

6.  Structure of a nanobody-stabilized active state of the β(2) adrenoceptor.

Authors:  Søren G F Rasmussen; Hee-Jung Choi; Juan Jose Fung; Els Pardon; Paola Casarosa; Pil Seok Chae; Brian T Devree; Daniel M Rosenbaum; Foon Sun Thian; Tong Sun Kobilka; Andreas Schnapp; Ingo Konetzki; Roger K Sunahara; Samuel H Gellman; Alexander Pautsch; Jan Steyaert; William I Weis; Brian K Kobilka
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Structure of a beta1-adrenergic G-protein-coupled receptor.

Authors:  Tony Warne; Maria J Serrano-Vega; Jillian G Baker; Rouslan Moukhametzianov; Patricia C Edwards; Richard Henderson; Andrew G W Leslie; Christopher G Tate; Gebhard F X Schertler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  The role of Gbetagamma subunits in the organization, assembly, and function of GPCR signaling complexes.

Authors:  Denis J Dupré; Mélanie Robitaille; R Victor Rebois; Terence E Hébert
Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 13.820

9.  Micelles protect membrane complexes from solution to vacuum.

Authors:  Nelson P Barrera; Natalie Di Bartolo; Paula J Booth; Carol V Robinson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Mass spectrometry of membrane transporters reveals subunit stoichiometry and interactions.

Authors:  Nelson P Barrera; Shoshanna C Isaacson; Min Zhou; Vassiliy N Bavro; Alex Welch; Theresia A Schaedler; Markus A Seeger; Ricardo Núñez Miguel; Vladimir M Korkhov; Hendrik W van Veen; Henrietta Venter; Adrian R Walmsley; Christopher G Tate; Carol V Robinson
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2009-07-05       Impact factor: 28.547

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  High-Throughput Native Mass Spectrometry Screening in Drug Discovery.

Authors:  Agni F M Gavriilidou; Kleitos Sokratous; Hsin-Yung Yen; Luigi De Colibus
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2022-04-14
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.