| Literature DB >> 30510653 |
Parvin Mirmiran1, Hoda Hadavi1, Azadeh Mottaghi2, Fereidoun Azizi3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Metabolic syndrome is a prevalent condition with dramatic rising trend worldwide. Single dietary factors, such as omega-3 fatty acids consumption protect body against oxidative damage by reinforcement of dietary total antioxidant capacity but the combination of all dietary components may be more effective when studied as integrated dietary patterns. This present study was designed to assess the association between different dietary patterns and oxidative stress in a population of Tehranian adults suffering from metabolic syndrome.Entities:
Keywords: Dietary patterns; Metabolic syndrome; Oxidative stress
Year: 2018 PMID: 30510653 PMCID: PMC6230449 DOI: 10.22088/cjim.9.4.376
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Caspian J Intern Med ISSN: 2008-6164
Figure 1Subject sampling chart
Food grouping used in the dietary pattern analysis
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Refined grains | White bread (lavash, baguettes), noodles, pasta, rice, toasted bread, sweet bread, white flour, biscuits |
| Fast foods | Processed meats, pizza |
| Potatoes | Potato (all preparations) |
| Salty snacks | Salty biscuits, crackers, puffs, potato chips, pickles and salty vegetables, popcorn, salt |
| Mayonnaise | Mayonnaise, and all fatty sauces |
| Carbonated drinks | Coca-cola, other carbonated beverage, low-energy carbonated beverages and sweet drink, beer |
| Egg | Egg (all preparations) |
| Vegetables | All green leafy, cruciferous, yellow, tomato, and other vegetables |
| Whole grains | All whole and dark breads, barley, wheat, wheat germ, shredded wheat/barely, |
| Fruit and dried fruit | All fruit and natural fruit juices, dried fruit |
| Poultry and fish | All fishes, canned tuna fish, chicken (all preparations) |
| High- and low-fat dairy products | High-fat milk and yogurt, chocolate milk, creamy yogurt, creamy cheese, |
| Canned products | All fruit with added sugars (Jams and fruit), honey |
| Liquid oils | All vegetable oils, olive oil |
| Solid oils | Hydrogenated fats, animal fats (butter, cream) |
| Sweets | All cakes, confections, chocolates, cookies, all biscuits, desserts |
| Red meats | Beef, lamb, hamburger |
| Organ meats | Liver, brain, and the other organ meats |
| Tea and coffee | Tea and coffee |
| Nuts and seeds | All nuts and seeds (raw or roasted) |
| Legumes | All kinds of beans, peas, lentils, soy |
| Olives | Olives, Olive oil |
Factor loading of 3 dietary patterns extracted by factor analysis
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Fruit and dried fruit | 0.670 | |
| Vegetables | 0.721 | |
| Olives | 0.651 | |
| Dairy products | 0.392 | |
| Liquid oils | 0.273 | |
| Solid oils | -0.556 | |
| Canned products | 0.603 | |
| Fast foods | 0.702 | |
| Sweets | 0.646 | |
| Mayonnaise | 0.603 | |
| Organ meats | 0.500 | |
| potatoes | 0.283 | |
| Egg | 0.386 | |
| Red meats | 0.465 | |
| Refined grains | -0.477 | 0.233 |
| Whole grains | -0.473 | -0.468 |
| Poultry and fish | 0.405 | 0.200 |
| Carbonated drinks | -0.358 | 0.626 |
| Nuts and seeds | 0.475 | 0.203 |
| Percentage of variance explained | 14 | 15 |
Values are factor loading of dietary patterns (n=1386). Factor loading ≤0.2 is not shown.
Eigen value>1. Factor analysis was done.
Basic characteristics of patients according to dietary patterns quintile
|
|
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Age (y) | 47.24±10.22 | 52.58±9.06 | 49.99±9.45 | 0.003 | 53.38±9.32 | 49.21±9.32 | 45.11±7.88 | 0.0001 |
| Sex (%) | 0.0001 | |||||||
| Male | 70 | 54 | 34 | 41 | 46 | 66 | 0.006 | |
| BMI (Kg/m2) | 30.69±4.87 | 29.71±2.80 | 31.31±4.43 | 0.054 | 30.51±3.74 | 31.14±5.53 | 30.56±4.21 | 0.797 |
| Physical activity (MET-h/wk) | 336.08±550.97 | 463.30±703.08 | 844.23±1075.91 | 0.0001 | 627.54±837.68 | 410.43±606.20 | 527.14±749.70 | 0.445 |
| Current smoker (%) | 22.8 | 16.3 | 14 | 0.003 | 12.9 | 14 | 29.9 | 0.0001 |
| Energy intake (kcal/d) | 2569±714 | 2348±707 | 2401±673 | 0.068 | 2564±798 | 2338±642 | 2472±654 | 0.309 |
| Cholesterol (mg/d) | 169.84±113.05 | 200.74±93.13 | 200.21±78.67 | 0.0001 | 142.85±71.78 | 189.81±78.56 | 241.97±102.92 | 0.0001 |
| Saturated fat (g/d) | 24.01±7.47 | 23.41±5.35 | 23.04±6.56 | 0.523 | 20.96±5.47 | 24.12±5.76 | 25.17±6.02 | 0.0001 |
| Monounsaturated fat (g/d) | 25.30±7.56 | 26.32±10.89 | 24.33±5.35 | 0.600 | 23.89±6.54 | 23.13±5.6 | 25.70±5.57 | 0.013 |
| Polyunsaturated fat (g/d) | 15.98±6.44 | 16.12±5.76 | 14.01±4.03 | 0.010 | 14.50±5.54 | 13.31±3.58 | 15.41±4.80 | 0.037 |
| Fiber (g/d) | 41.41±20.01 | 45.17±20.36 | 48.56±17.40 | 0.0001 | 52.76±16.67 | 41.32±15.34 | 37.46±11.51 | 0.0001 |
| Protein (g/d) | 78.37±14.67 | 84.49±13.51 | 95.00±18.40 | 0.0001 | 90.33±16.50 | 84.74±18.37 | 84.14±14.97 | 0.099 |
| Carbohydrate (g/d) | 338.78±44.28 | 339.57±48.08 | 340.97±35.29 | 0.903 | 345.34±39.01 | 349.15±37.12 | 329.77±36.86 | 0.004 |
All data were expressed as mean±SD or percentage
One-way ANOVA was used
Metabolic equivalent (energy need per kilogram of body weight per hour of activity divided by the energy need per kilogram of body weight per hour at rest) hours per week
Energy adjusted
p<0.05
p<0.01
P<0.001
Serum concentration of total antioxidant capacity (TAC) and Malondialdehyde (MDA) by quintile of dietary pattern
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Healthy | U/ml | µmol/L |
| Q1 | 6.85 (6.37, 7.33) | 5.46 (4.13, 6.79) |
| Q5 | 9.87 (9.54, 10.24) | 3.03 (2.52, 3.54) |
| P value | 0.0001 | 0.005 |
| Unhealthy | ||
| Q1 | 8.90 (7.66, 10.16) | 3.49 (1.96, 5.02) |
| Q5 | 6.11 (5.63, 6.60) | 6.02 (5.35, 6.69) |
| P value | 0.001 | 0.013 |
Independent sample t-test was used.
For the p<0.05,
p<0.01 and
P<0.001.
β regression coefficients for a one z-score increase in dietary pattern scores
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| TAC | 0.278 (0.0001 | 0.258 (0.005 | 0.244 (0.008 | -0.378 (0.0001 | -0.305 (0.0001 | -0.289 (0.001 |
| MDA | -0.213 (0.004 | -0.274 (0.001 | -0.273 (0.002 | 0.355 (0.0001 | 0.386 (0.0001 | 0.387 (0.0001 |
P values in parentheses.
Model 1 was unadjusted.
Model 2 was adjusted for age, sex, physical activity, and smoking status.
Model 3 was adjusted for all factors in model 2 plus BMI.
Multiple linear regressions analysis was used.
For the p<0.05,
p<0.01 and
P<0.001.